Bioactive Glass Air-abrasion and Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Effect of Surface Pre-conditioning With Bioactive Glass Air-abrasion on the Clinical Performance of Composite Restorations in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluating the clinical behavior of composite restorations in NCCLs when the surface is pre-conditioned using bioactive glass air-abrasion has not been reported in the dental literature. This double-blinded randomised clinical trial evaluated the effect of surface pre-conditioning with bioactive air-abrasion on the performance of composite restorations in NCCLs placed using etch\&rinse and self-etch adhesive systems.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2020
CompletedOctober 20, 2020
October 1, 2020
10 months
September 23, 2020
October 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Restoration Retention Rate and Integrity
The unabbreviated scale title: Restoration Retention Rate and Integrity Scale The minimum and maximum values: 1, 5 Higher scores mean a worse outcome. 1. Restoration retained, no fractures/ cracks 2. Small hairline crack 3. Two or larger hairline cracks and/or chipping (not affecting the marginal integrity) 4. Chipping fractures which damage marginal quality 5. Partial or complete loss of restoration
Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline rate of retention at 3 months, Change from Baseline rate of retention at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Marginal Adaptation
Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline marginal adaptation at 3 months, Change from Baseline marginal adaptation at 6 months
Change in Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline postoperative hypersensitivity at 3 months, Change from Baseline postoperative hypersensitivity at 6 months
Change in Recurrence of Caries
Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline recurrence of caries at 3 months, Change from Baseline recurrence of caries at 6 months
Change in Marginal Staining
Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline staining margin at 3 months, Change from Baseline staining margin at 6 months
Study Arms (4)
Air-abrasion + Etch & rinse adhesive
EXPERIMENTALAir-abrasion unit was used to pre-condition the NCCLs with bioactive glass 45S5 followed by etch\&rinse adhesive application using 37% Phosphoric acid for 30 sec and 15 sec respectively. NCCLs were rinsed thoroughly for 20 sec to remove the acid. Excess water was removed using a cotton pellet to leave a moist dentine surface. One coat of bonding adhesive was gently scrubbed on the entire enamel and dentin surface for 20 sec, air dried for 5 sec and light cured for 10 sec using LED curing light
Air-abrasion + Self-etch adhesive
EXPERIMENTALAir-abrasion unit was used to pre-condition the NCCLs with bioactive glass 45S5 followed by self-etch adhesive application which was applied to enamel and dentine for 20 sec with agitation, gently air dried and light cured for 10 sec.
Etch & rinse adhesive
EXPERIMENTALEnamel and dentine were etched using 37% Phosphoric acid for 30 sec and 15 sec respectively. NCCLs were rinsed thoroughly for 20 sec to remove the acid. Excess water was removed using a cotton pellet to leave a moist dentine surface. One coat of bonding adhesive was gently scrubbed on the entire enamel and dentin surface for 20 sec, air dried for 5 sec and light cured for 10 sec using LED curing light
Self-etch adhesive
EXPERIMENTALThe bonding adhesive was applied to enamel and dentine for 20 sec with agitation, gently air dried and light cured for 10 sec.
Interventions
A clinical air-abrasion unit was used to pre-condition the NCCLs with bioactive glass 45S5 powder for 10 sec. The operating parameters were; air pressure, 20 psi; powder particles size, 20 µm; nozzle angle, 90◦; nozzle-lesion distance, 5 mm and the internal nozzle diameter, 900 µm
Enamel and dentine were etched using 37% Phosphoric acid for 30 sec and 15 sec respectively. NCCLs were rinsed thoroughly for 20 sec to remove the acid. Excess water was removed using a cotton pellet to leave a moist dentine surface. One coat of bonding adhesive was gently scrubbed on the entire enamel and dentin surface for 20 sec, air dried for 5 sec and light cured for 10 sec using LED curing light. The light intensity of curing unit was calibrated daily using curing radiometer .
The bonding adhesive was applied to enamel and dentine for 20 sec with agitation, gently air dried and light cured for 10 sec.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be at least 19 years old, be in good general and oral health and be available for follow-up visits
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic therapeutic drug history, rampant uncontrolled caries, periodontal disease, pregnancy or lactation, orthodontic appliance use, evidence of xerostomia, evidence of severe bruxing, clenching or TMD, and known sensitivity to acrylates or related materials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (9)
Zanatta RF, Silva TM, Esper M, Bresciani E, Goncalves S, Caneppele T. Bonding Performance of Simplified Adhesive Systems in Noncarious Cervical Lesions at 2-year Follow-up: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2019 Sep/Oct;44(5):476-487. doi: 10.2341/18-049-C. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
PMID: 30702405BACKGROUNDLawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015 Oct;43(10):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26231300BACKGROUNDHafer M, Jentsch H, Haak R, Schneider H. A three-year clinical evaluation of a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015 Mar;43(3):350-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
PMID: 25541248BACKGROUNDPerdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):113-27. doi: 10.2341/13-045-C. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
PMID: 23802645BACKGROUNDPaula EA, Tay LY, Kose C, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A, Perdigao J, Loguercio AD. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015 Spring;10(1):122-145.
PMID: 25625130BACKGROUNDSchroeder M, Correa IC, Bauer J, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:36-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 8.
PMID: 28495559BACKGROUNDvan Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000 Jul;16(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00019-1.
PMID: 10831784BACKGROUNDLoguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
PMID: 28962842BACKGROUNDSauro S, Watson TF, Thompson I, Banerjee A. One-bottle self-etching adhesives applied to dentine air-abraded using bioactive glasses containing polyacrylic acid: an in vitro microtensile bond strength and confocal microscopy study. J Dent. 2012 Nov;40(11):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
PMID: 22819812BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hussam Milly, Phd
Damascus University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Clinical evaluation of NCCLs restorations was conducted by two trained and calibrated examiners.The examiners and patients were blinded to the group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2020
First Posted
October 8, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share