Comparison of Office-based KTP and CO2 Laser Outcomes in Patients With Vocal Cord Lesions.
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the outcomes of a CO2 laser device called AcuPulse Duo on vocal lesions and compare them to the most commonly used Aura KTP laser in order to determine which device has the best results. The CO2 laser device is an already FDA approved device. However, there have been no studies comparing the two devices for this use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2021
CompletedJune 24, 2024
June 1, 2024
5 months
September 30, 2020
June 20, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Absolute change from baseline in mucosal wave grade
Absolute change from baseline in mucosal wave grade using videostroboscopy on each treated vocal fold 2-3 months after the treatment for both groups. Videostroboscopy is a standard of care procedure for patients with voice problems and would be performed regardless of the subject's participation in the study.
Treatment Visit (Day 0), Follow up Visit (6-12 weeks)
Absolute and percentage change from baseline
Absolute and percentage change from baseline in the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score 2-3 months after the treatment. Measured by Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), a self reported questionnaire assessing the frequency of characteristics of their voice and the effects their voice has on their lives. 10 statements using a scale where 0 is "Never" and 4 is "Always"
Treatment Visit (Day 0), Follow up Visit (6-12 weeks)
Change in Physician's satisfaction
In using a self reported questionnaire to determine how easy it was to use the CO2 laser. Questions asked: Ease of use, completeness of treatment, bleeding issues, complications and case time from laser start to finish.
Treatment Visit (Day 0), Follow up Visit (6-12 weeks)
Change in Patient's discomfort
Patient comfort during the procedure will be measured by Patient Discomfort questionnaire. (All lesion types). The Patient-Comfort Scale is a 5 scale rating: 1- no, 2- minimal, 3-mild, 4-moderate, 5-severe.
Treatment Visit (Day 0), Follow up Visit (6-12 weeks)
Change in Lesion regression
Lesion regression (based on endoscopic measurement technique) Stills from the laryngoscopic exam will be imported and measured into the Image J software.
Treatment Visit (Day 0), Follow up Visit (6-12 weeks)
Study Arms (1)
CO2 laser device group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants who will be undergoing laser treatment for their vocal nodes with a specific laser device. AcuPulse Duo, a CO2 laser is absorbed by water found in soft tissues and is independent of tissue color. It is very precise and causes less damage of the deep tissues, which results in less swelling and faster recovery. The absence of a long healing process means that most patients can resume their normal activities even on the same day The CO2 laser is the preferred laser for use in the operating room.
Interventions
the CO2 laser (AcuPulse DUO, Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) generally ranges from 3 to 10 W in superpulse mode, with 0.05 second on/0.01 second off, depending on lesion size and location of the lesion(s). The CO2 laser can be used in a continuous, pulsed, or superpulsed mode. The superpulsed mode reduces the exposure time to a few nanoseconds while delivering high energies of 400 to 500 W with each peak. The rest time between each peak allows the tissues to cool and reduces thermal injury to adjacent tissues.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of laryngeal papillomatosis, hemorrhagic polyps, or leukoplakia/dysplasia of the vocal folds requiring in-office treatment.
- Has the capacity to provide consent
You may not qualify if:
- Accutane (Isotretinoin) within the past 6-12 months
- History of keloid formation
- Demonstration of excessive or unusually prolonged erythema
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NYU Langone
New York, New York, 10016, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Milan Amin, MD
NYU Langone Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2020
First Posted
October 5, 2020
Study Start
January 26, 2021
Primary Completion
June 29, 2021
Study Completion
June 29, 2021
Last Updated
June 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
- Access Criteria
- The investigator who proposed to use the data.Upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to achlae01@nyu.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).