NCT03433664

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effect effect of ablative fractional CO2 laser (AFCO2L) on burns scar appearance and dermal architecture at 6 weeks and up to 3-years post-treatment. Half of the scar will receive AFCO2L and half the scar will receive standard care.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 16, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 16, 2015

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 6, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 14, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 14, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

January 6, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

CO2 laserAblative fractional laser

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in modified Vancouver Scar Scale from baseline at 6 weeks post-final treatment

    The Modified Vancouver Scar Scale requires an assessor to rate the patient's scars in 4 domains, each assigning a score to the scar for different qualities (pliability, height, vascularity and pigmentation) from 0 to 4 in pliability and height; and 0 to 3 in vascularity and pigmentation, where 0 is a 'normal' score as close to normal skin as possible and a score of 3 or 4 would indicate a poor outcome, dissimilar to normal skin. The minimum total score is 0 (very good scar) and maximum score is 14 (very bad scar)

    6 weeks post final treatment

  • Change in Patient Scar Assessment Scale (patient element of the POSAS scale) from baseline at 6 weeks post-final treatment

    Patient element of the POSAS scale (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) version 2.0. The scale asks the patient to rate their scars in 6 domains, each assigning a score to the scar for different qualities (pain, itch, colour, stiffness, thickness irregularity and overall opinion) from 1 to 10, where 1 is a very good score and 10 is a very poor score. The minimum total score is 7 (very good scar) and maximum score is 70 (very bad scar)

    6 weeks post final treatment

  • Change in Scar histology from baseline at 6 weeks post-final treatment

    3mm punch biopsies from treatment and control segments of scar looking at dermal architecture in terms of collagen fibre thickness and orientation

    6 weeks post final treatment

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Scar histology from baseline at 48-72 hours after the first treatment

    48-72 hours after the first treatment

  • Change in modified Vancouver Scar Scale from baseline at 2-3 years post-final treatment

    2-3 years after the final treatment

  • Change in Patient Scar Assessment Scale (patient element of the POSAS scale) from baseline at 6 weeks post-final treatment

    2-3 years after the final treatment

  • Change in Scar histology from baseline at 2-3 years post-final treatment

    2-3 years after the final treatment

Study Arms (2)

Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Each treatment half of the scar received three standardised CO2 laser treatments using the DeepFX setting hand piece (Ultrapulse, Lumenis), performed under general anaesthetic at 4-6 week intervals. All treatments consisted of a single pass of 300Hz, 5% density and 50mJ energy with minimal overlapping. Post-operatively all laser treatment and control zones had emollient applied and silicone dressings which were removed at 48 hours. Further emollient was applied twice daily for 2 weeks to all areas of the scar. Standard care scar management (including silicone, massage and pressure garments) was directed by burn occupational therapists and was continued for all areas of scar.

Device: CO2 laser

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Each control half of the scar received emollient applied twice daily for 2 weeks to all areas of the scar after each treatment. Standard care scar management (including silicone, massage and pressure garments) was directed by burn occupational therapists and was continued for all areas of scar.

Interventions

CO2 laserDEVICE

Fractional CO2 laser treatment using the DeepFX setting hand piece (Ultrapulse, Lumenis), performed under general anaesthetic at 4-6 week intervals. All treatments consisted of a single pass of 300Hz, 5% density and 50mJ energy with minimal overlapping

Also known as: Ablative Fractional CO2 laser
Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Minimum burn injury scar area of 10x10cm
  • Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score of \>5
  • ≥6 months following injury
  • Patient age 18+ years

You may not qualify if:

  • Current pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients unable to consent (dementia or another cognitive dysfunction)
  • Non-English-speaking patients
  • Scars on the face or hand (these anatomical areas were considered to be of significant aesthetic and functional importance and thus excluded from the trial )

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Lasers, Gas

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LasersOptical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Fiona M Wood, FRACS

    UWA and State Burns Unit WA

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patient and treating clinician were aware of which scar half had been treated, however investigator and assessor were blinded
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Scar area (10x10cm square) randomly assigned a square vector 'map' which split the scar into a control and treatment half along one of 4 vectors: vertical, horizontal, and along both diagonals. The envelope revealing the vector map and treatment zones was opened by the treating laser clinician immediately prior to the first treatment. The same treating clinician performed all laser treatments to minimise inter-user variability.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of State Burns Unit WA

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2018

First Posted

February 14, 2018

Study Start

February 20, 2014

Primary Completion

January 16, 2015

Study Completion

July 16, 2015

Last Updated

February 14, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data for primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Within 6 months of study completion
Access Criteria
By liaison with principal investigator