Automated Microscopy Evaluation Study
AutoMic
Clinical Evaluation of Automated Microscope Solutions for Malaria Diagnosis
1 other identifier
observational
190
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since the introduction of Giemsa stain in 1904 until today, malaria microscopy has been the standard of practice for malaria diagnosis. However, microscopic detection of malaria parasites is labour-intensive, time-consuming and expertise-demanding. Moreover, the slide interpretation is highly dependent on the staining technique and the technician's expertise. To address these, multiple organisations have developed next generation microscopes to move towards a next generation microscope that can improve slide preparation, interpretation or data collection, or a combination of these features. In this study, a prospective evaluation of miLab™ and other next generation automated microscope solutions as well as a malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) reader app will be performed in malaria-endemic countries to assess their clinical performance for detection of malaria clinical cases at POC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedNovember 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.4 years
September 15, 2020
November 15, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical performance assessment
Point estimates of clinical performance characteristics with 95% confidence intervals (sensitivity, specificity) of next generation microscopy tools using nPCR as the reference test for the detection of malaria clinical cases
up to 6 months
Concordance
Point estimate with 95% confidence intervals of the percentage agreement in interpreting malaria diagnostics between the app and visual reading
up to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Case
Symptomatic patients positive for malaria by PCR
Control
Symptomatic patients negative for malaria by PCR
Interventions
Next generation microscopy tools for malaria diagnosis and medical applications
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria seeking clinical care in health facilities
You may qualify if:
- Aged 5 years or older
- Malaria status (positive or negative) established by microscopy at the health facility, where the patient is presenting
- Freely agreeing to participate by signing an informed consent form (adults aged 18 and older and parent/legal guardian of a child) and providing assent (children aged 13-17)
- Willing to provide finger prick blood sample at enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Having received antimalarial treatment during the preceding four-week period
- Presence of symptoms and signs of severe disease and/or central nervous system infections, as defined by WHO guidelines
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Endemic Diseases, Medical Campus
Khartoum, Sudan
Related Publications (1)
Hamid MMA, Mohamed AO, Mohammed FO, Elaagip A, Mustafa SA, Elfaki T, Jebreel WMA, Albsheer MM, Dittrich S, Owusu EDA, Yerlikaya S. Diagnostic accuracy of an automated microscope solution (miLab) in detecting malaria parasites in symptomatic patients at point-of-care in Sudan: a case-control study. Malar J. 2024 Jun 28;23(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05029-3.
PMID: 38943203DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2020
First Posted
September 22, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share