Factors Affecting Post-treatment Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
observational
407
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
EASL and mRECIST criteria differ from each other in terms of the number of target lesions (all versus \< = 2) and calculation method (bidimensional versus unidimensional). Therefore, the investigators aimed to retrospectively analyze and compare the clinical outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with different modalities of therapy according to the BCLC classification, and detect the possible predictors of post-treatment outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2020
CompletedSeptember 17, 2020
September 1, 2020
5 years
September 5, 2020
September 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
CURE (Number of patients cured completely from the disease)
the HCC is treated (disappearance of all lesions)
one-year
STABLE Disease (Number of patients with neither progression nor cure from the disease)
NONE of the other outcomes' criteria
one-year
PROGRESSIVE((Number of patients with progression of the disease) (measured by follow-up CT scans, increase in size, appearance of new intratumoral lesions, or appearance of new lesions
increase in size - appearance of new intratumoral lesions - new lesions
one-year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
DEATH (Number of patients died from the disease)
one-year
Study Arms (2)
Favorable outcome
Cure or stable disease
Unfavorable outcome
Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death
Interventions
Radiofrequency ablation of the tumour
Trance-arterial chemotherapy
combined therapy
Percutaneous ethanol injection of HCC
Eligibility Criteria
This work was conducted at the departments of tropical medicine and gastroenterology, internal medicine, and general surgery. This study included patients that matched our eligibility criteria for a period of five years started from June 2015 to May 2020. The study purpose was to retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes among patients with HCC who were treated with different modalities of therapy according to the BCLC classification, and detect the possible predictors of post-treatment favorable outcomes.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients
- with hepatocellular carcinoma
You may not qualify if:
- severely-ill patients
- With other system comorbidities,
- presence of extrahepatic metastasis,
- patients who dropped from the follow-up list after treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emad A. Ahmed, MD, PhD
Sohag University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2020
First Posted
September 17, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09