Orsi Surgical Skills E-learning Trial
OSSET
Prospective and Randomized Assessment of the Impact of Proficiency-based Progression E-learning Prior to Skills Training on a Robotic Surgical Task
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The training of robotic surgical procedural skills has been challenged by changes in work practices and safety concerns specifically related to training. In surgery and procedural medicine simulation-based training has been demonstrated to supplant the early part of the learning curve. Training in the skills laboratory is however expensive because of equipment and supervision burdens. In this study the investigators will assess the economic impact of proficiency-based progression (PBP) e-learning training prior to training in the skills laboratory. 48 trainees will be randomly assigned to one of four groups. 1) will receive an apprenticeship type training (Group 1 ; n=12), 2) A standard or traditional trained group (Group 2; n=12) will then receive face-to-face lectures on how to perform the robotic surgical training task (i.e., ORSI chicken anastomosis task for learning robotic suturing and knot tying.) 3) The third group (Group 3; n=12) will have e-learning training prior to training in the skills laboratory and then learn the same task. 4) The fourth group (Group 4; n=12) will have the exact same pre-course e-learning curriculum as Group 3 but will be required to study it until they score at the quantitatively defined proficiency benchmark of experienced robotic surgeons, i.e., the mean performance level of experienced robotic surgeons - they can complete the task with \<10 performance errors. The research will be conducted at the laboratory skills lab of Orsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12 9090 Melle. It will be conducted by Maxime Lasseel and Laura Langhendries, under direct guidance of Dr. S. Puliatti, Prof. A.G. Gallagher and Prof. A. Mottrie.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable surgery
Started Aug 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable surgery
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2020
CompletedDecember 22, 2020
December 1, 2020
26 days
August 26, 2020
December 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Errors made during the task at baseline
We will measure the amount of errors made bij trainees during the procedure via a metric based system at baseline when the participants do their first chicken anastomosis task. This task takes maximum 30 minutes
30 minutes
Errors made during the task at proficiency
Participants repeat the chicken anastomosis task in order to train themselves. Every 30 minutes, a new participant starts the task. Examinators will assess the errors made by trainees via a metric based system at every attempt until they demonstrate proficiency. Every 30 minutes, errors will be assessed.
30 minutes
Cost of training (in euro)
The economic impact of proficiency-based training. We will watch and note the resources utilised (amount of sutures, amount of chickens utilised by the participants) and time needed (in minutes) to reach proficiency. By knowing these elements, we can calculate the price per hour that it costs to train trainees in the specific groups.
Up to 9 days
Study Arms (4)
Group 1: Online didactic to proficiency PBP+
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1 Pre-trained group will receive information on how to optimally perform the ORSI chicken anastomosis task and the material will be delivered online via the ORSI e-learning platform. They will be given access to the material two weeks before their training. Unlike the other groups, Group 1 will be required to study the material to a pre-defined performance benchmark or proficiency level. Once the online course is completed, participants have to perform the orsi chicken anastomosis task.
Group 2: Online didactic PBP+
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Pre-trained group (Group 2) will receive the exact same information as Group 1 on how to optimally perform the ORSI chicken anastomosis task but they are not required to study the material to a pre-defined proficiency benchmark. The time they spend on the task and effort expended will be logged. Once the online course is completed, participants have to perform the orsi chicken anastomosis task.
Group 3: Standard training group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard trained group will receive face-to-face lectures on how to perform the ORSI chicken anastomosis task. It will not differ from what they would normally receive during a traditional surgery training course when they arrive at the ORSI academy for their training. The content of the face-to face lecture is the same as in the e-learning courses. After the face-to face lecture, the participants have to perform the orsi chicken anastomosis task.
Group 4: Apprenticeship Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe apprenticeship trained group will not receive face-to-face lectures or e-learning on how to perform the ORSI chicken anastomosis task. They will however receive hands-on practical one-to-one training during a traditional surgical training course, with deliberate practice. During this course, clinicians will train the participants on how to perform the orsi anastomosis task. They will also receive published materials describing how best to perform the task and mentoring on suturing and knot tying by a task expert who will guide their performance.
Interventions
Participants will receive an online e-course with a proficiency test at the end. Afterwards, participants will have to perform a hermetic circular anastomosis that allows connecting two anatomical tubular structures using an outside-inside direction in the stomach and inside-outside in the cloaca. Two hemi-continuous sutures must be performed, knotting the two treads at the end.
Participants will receive an online e-course but are not required to pass the proficiency test. Afterwards, participants will have to perform a hermetic circular anastomosis that allows connecting two anatomical tubular structures using an outside-inside direction in the stomach and inside-outside in the cloaca. Two hemi-continuous sutures must be performed, knotting the two treads at the end.
After receiving a traditional lecture, participants will have to perform a hermetic circular anastomosis that allows connecting two anatomical tubular structures using an outside-inside direction in the stomach and inside-outside in the cloaca. Two hemi-continuous sutures must be performed, knotting the two treads at the end.
Participants will have to perform a hermetic circular anastomosis that allows connecting two anatomical tubular structures using an outside-inside direction in the stomach and inside-outside in the cloaca. Two hemi-continuous sutures must be performed, knotting the two treads at the end. Participants will only receive papers on how the task will be performed and clinicians will help them with completion of the task.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Second bachelor - second master students enrolled in a University.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous experience on robotic surgery tasks.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Orsi Academylead
Study Sites (1)
Orsi Academy
Melle, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9090, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Puliatti S, Rodriguez Penaranda N, Amato M, De Groote R, Farinha R, Bunting B, van Cleynenbreugel B, Mottrie A, Gallagher AG. Randomised trial on the economic impact of proficiency-based progression vs conventional robotic surgical training. BJU Int. 2026 Jan 2. doi: 10.1111/bju.70130. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41482504DERIVEDPuliatti S, Amato M, Farinha R, Paludo A, Rosiello G, De Groote R, Mari A, Bianchi L, Piazza P, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Mazzone E, Migliorini F, Forte S, Rocco B, Kiely P, Mottrie A, Gallagher AG. Does quality assured eLearning provide adequate preparation for robotic surgical skills; a prospective, randomized and multi-center study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Mar;17(3):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02545-4. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
PMID: 34997525DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefano Puliatti, Medical Dir
ORSI Acadmy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants do not know in which group they will be assigned and they will not know the study design. The investigators know which study group is training in the skills lab.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2020
First Posted
September 9, 2020
Study Start
August 25, 2020
Primary Completion
September 20, 2020
Study Completion
September 20, 2020
Last Updated
December 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share