NCT04516395

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes in patients with CRE infections.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2020

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 18, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 26, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

July 20, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Pharmacokinetics/PharmacodynamicsAntibiotic combination regimensDose-optimizationCarbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical improvement or failure

    * Clinical improvement was defined as resolution of the signs and symptoms of the infection with no change or addition antibiotic therapy at the end of treatment course, excepting de-escalation to a narrower spectrum antibiotic. * Clinical failure was defined as the signs and symptoms of the infection being more serious with change or addition antibiotic therapy against CRE.

    up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Mortality

    Within 14 and 28/30 days after discharge

  • Length of stay

    up to 12 weeks

  • Physician acceptance rates

    up to 72 hours after reporting the bacterial culture results

  • Microbiological outcomes

    Before discharge

Study Arms (2)

Optimal antibiotic combination regimens

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients in the groups will be given the optimal antibiotic combination regimens.

Other: Combined antibiotic regimens

Standard antibiotic regimens

OTHER

The patients in the groups will be given the standard antibiotic regimens.

Other: Standard antibiotic regimens

Interventions

Combined antibiotic combinations defined as the optimal antibiotic combination regimens which are created from in vitro study and the application of PK/PD.

Optimal antibiotic combination regimens

Standard antibiotic regimens defined as the antibiotic regimens which are generally given to the patients following to the hospital protocol.

Standard antibiotic regimens

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Any patients are diagnosed any diseases caused by CRE infection by physicians at Phramongkutklao hospital during 1/4/2018 to 30/4/2021.
  • Any patients are more than 18 years old.
  • Any patients have at least 1 criterion as following 3.1 Any patients have at least 2 of the signs and symptoms of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), including
  • Fever (temperature \> 38 °C) or hypothermia (temperature \< 36°C)
  • Tachypnea (heart rate \> 90 beats per minute)
  • Respiratory rate \> 20 beats per minute or Paco2 \< 32 mm Hg (4.3 kPa)
  • White blood cell count \> 12,000 cells per millilitre (leukocytosis) or \< 4,000 cells per milliliter (leukopenia) 3.2. Any patients are diagnosed with sepsis or have ≥ 2 points of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score or qSOFA (Quick SOFA) Score.
  • Any patients are diagnosed with septic shock or are received vasopressors (eg, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine), mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 65 mm Hg, and lactate \> 2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) 3.4 Any patients are received mechanical ventilation 3.5 Any patients are admitted at ICU ward.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients are breast-feeding or pregnancy.
  • Patients are insufficient or incomplete information on the medical electronic record such as patients transferred.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Phramongkutklao hospital

Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

  • Tillotson G. A crucial list of pathogens. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):234-236. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30754-5. Epub 2017 Dec 21. No abstract available.

  • Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, Srinivasan A, Dellit TH, Falck-Ytter YT, Fishman NO, Hamilton CW, Jenkins TC, Lipsett PA, Malani PN, May LS, Moran GJ, Neuhauser MM, Newland JG, Ohl CA, Samore MH, Seo SK, Trivedi KK. Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):e51-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw118. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

  • Asin-Prieto E, Rodriguez-Gascon A, Isla A. Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents. J Infect Chemother. 2015 May;21(5):319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

  • Rodriguez-Bano J, Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A. Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Feb 14;31(2):e00079-17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00079-17. Print 2018 Apr.

  • Tamma PD, Goodman KE, Harris AD, Tekle T, Roberts A, Taiwo A, Simner PJ. Comparing the Outcomes of Patients With Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 1;64(3):257-264. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw741. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

  • Demidenko E, Miller TW. Statistical determination of synergy based on Bliss definition of drugs independence. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0224137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224137. eCollection 2019.

  • Sheu CC, Chang YT, Lin SY, Chen YH, Hsueh PR. Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An Update on Therapeutic Options. Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;10:80. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00080. eCollection 2019.

  • Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Salamanca E, de Cueto M, Hsueh PR, Viale P, Pano-Pardo JR, Venditti M, Tumbarello M, Daikos G, Canton R, Doi Y, Tuon FF, Karaiskos I, Perez-Nadales E, Schwaber MJ, Azap OK, Souli M, Roilides E, Pournaras S, Akova M, Perez F, Bermejo J, Oliver A, Almela M, Lowman W, Almirante B, Bonomo RA, Carmeli Y, Paterson DL, Pascual A, Rodriguez-Bano J; REIPI/ESGBIS/INCREMENT Investigators. Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30228-1. Epub 2017 Apr 22.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, SepticCritical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShockDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Wichai Santimaleeworagun

    Silpakorn University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Wichai Santimaleeworagun, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: According to the model, it divided into two parts - retrospective chart review and prospective data collection. Single independent patient group will be divided two parts depending on over a period of time. The patients in the retrospective part received a standard treatment become a control group, while the patients in the prospective part received the intervention become an experimental group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2020

First Posted

August 18, 2020

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2021

Study Completion

April 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Locations