Effects of Manual Therapy on Shoulder Function
A Comparison of the Effects of Cervical and Thoracic Manipulation, Glenohumeral Mobilization, and Sleeper Stretch on Shoulder Strength and Range of Motion in Healthy Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to directly compare the effects of four distinct interventions commonly used in the treatment of shoulder pathology on shoulder range of motion (ROM) and strength in asymptomatic shoulders:
- grade III oscillatory anterior-posterior glenohumeral joint mobilizations
- an internal rotation (IR) "sleeper" stretch
- supine upper-thoracic manipulation
- cervical spine manipulation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 23, 2021
February 1, 2021
9 months
August 11, 2020
February 22, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in shoulder ER strength
pre-test post-test strength test of the infraspinatus with hand held dynamometer
immediate pre-post intervention
Change in shoulder IR ROM
change pre-post test IR ROM at 90 degrees ABD
immediate pre-post intervention
change in posterior shoulder mobility
change in pre-post test posterior shoulder mobility assessed in horizontal adduction
immediate pre-post intervention
change in infraspinatus EMG activity
change in pre-post test EMG peak and mean root squared activity
immediate pre-post intervention
Study Arms (6)
manual therapy combination 1
EXPERIMENTALCervical manipulation, Thoracic manipulation
manual therapy combination 2
EXPERIMENTALCervical manipulation, glenohumeral mobilization
manual therapy combination 3
EXPERIMENTALcervical manipulation, sleeper stretch
manual therapy combination 4
EXPERIMENTALthoracic manipulation, glenohumeral mobilization
manual therapy combination 5
EXPERIMENTALthoracic manipulation, sleeper stretch
manual therapy combination 6
EXPERIMENTALglenohumeral mobilization, sleeper stretch
Interventions
A supine thoracic manipulation will be utilized. Participants will be lying supine on the plinth with their arms crossed over their chest, making sure the forearms are not crossed. An experienced clinician will place their hand on the inferior segment (T4); the superior segment (T3) will be placed in the midrange of thoracic flexion and extension. The clinician will apply a high velocity, end range, anterior to posterior thrust by using their body weight to deliver the thrust through the participants crossed elbows, thus creating a bilateral gapping of the facet joints. If a cavitation is achieved after the first thrust, the thoracic manipulation intervention is complete. If not, one more attempt will be made to achieve a cavitation. Regardless of if there was a cavitation or not, after the second attempt the intervention is complete.
Participants will be lying supine on the plinth on the table. A high velocity low amplitude manipulation will be performed to the cervical spine by an experienced clinician.The clinician will place the right proximal phalanx of the index finger over the posterolateral aspect of the articular pillar at the right C4/C5 segment to maximally influence the C5 myotomal distribution. The clinician's left hand will be cradling the participants head. The participant will be brought into midrange flexion-extension, ipsilateral side bend, and contralateral rotation of C4/5. Once a firm end feel is felt the manipulation will be administered into left rotation in an arc toward the left eye. If a cavitation is achieved after the first thrust, the intervention is complete. If not, one more attempt will be made to achieve a cavitation;after the second attempt the intervention is complete.
Participants will be instructed to lay supine on the plinth and a plastic orthopedic wedge will be placed under their scapula for stabilization on the side that is receiving the mobilization. The experienced clinician will stand on the same side being mobilized and held the participant's arm proximal to the medial and lateral humeral epicondyles. The clinician will hold the participant's arm in the scapular plane, approximately 55 degrees of abduction and slight ER with a grade one long axis distraction applied and sustained throughout the entire mobilization. A grade three oscillatory mobilization will be applied for three sets of 30 seconds with a 30 second rest in between.
Participants will be positioned in a side lying position with the arm to be stretched on the table. The arm to be tested will then be positioned at a 90-90 shoulder abduction and elbow flexion position. A support will be positioned behind the patient to ensure there is no compensatory trunk movement during the stretch, and an examiner verified the arm is in a 90-90 position. A sleeper stretch will be subsequently completed, in which the participant will internally rotate the arm to stretch the posterior shoulder musculature. Three, thirty second stretches will be completed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants will be included in this study if they:
- are between the ages of 18 and 55
- have no history of shoulder, neck, or upper back dysfunction.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals will be excluded if they report having any of the following conditions:
- shoulder, neck, or upper back pain;
- prior shoulder, neck or upper back surgery;
- previous injury to shoulder, neck, or thoracic area;
- active inflammatory disease process in treatment area;
- osteoporosis;
- signs and symptoms of a nerve root pathology/radiculopathy (dermatomal sensory changes, myotomal weakness, reflex changes);
- upper motor neuron lesions/spinal cord pathology;
- local infection;
- active or history of cancer;
- long term corticosteroid use;
- systemically unwell;
- systemic hyperlaxity;
- known connective tissue disease;
- known abnormalities of the spine;
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Hartford
West Hartford, Connecticut, 06117, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Swanson, PT, DSc
University of Hartford
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- outcomes assessor blinded to group allocations
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2020
First Posted
August 14, 2020
Study Start
February 7, 2020
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will be made available in de-identified form upon request