NCT04506853

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of the approved population in adults and children with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Feb 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

6 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Feb 2021Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 22, 2021

Completed
5.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 24, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.8 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Long-term performance of the Cochlear Implant System will be assessed through speech perception testing in noise completed through three years (36 months) post implantation

    The primary effectiveness endpoint will be change on speech in noise when speech is presented to the front and noise is presented to the acoustic hearing (contralateral) ear. The pre-operative, best-aided score will be compared to the 12-month and 36-month CI score for AzBio sentences in noise(range of score 0-100, higher score is better). Improvement is defined as greater than or equal to 10 percentage points.

    Three years (36 months) post implantation

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Long term performance of the Cochlear Implant System will be summarized through speech perception testing in noise completed through three years (36 months) post implantation

    Three years (36 months) post implantation

  • Long term performance of the Cochlear Implant System will be assessed through speech perception testing in quiet completed through three (36 months) post implantation

    Three years (36 months) post implantation

  • Long term subjective benefit of the Cochlear Implant System will be assessed through three years (36 months) post implantation

    Three years (36 months) post implantation

  • Long term safety will be evaluated for all study subjects through three (36 months) years post implantation

    Three years (36 months) post implantation

Study Arms (1)

Study Procedure

OTHER
Device: MED-EL Cochlear Implant System

Interventions

Cochlear implant and audio processor

Study Procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Five years of age or older at the time of implantation
  • Unilateral profound hearing loss, as defined by a pure-tone average (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) of 90 dB or greater in the ear to be implanted
  • Sensorineural hearing loss in the ear to be implanted, as defined by an air-bone gap less than or equal to 10 dB at two or more frequencies out of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz and a diagnosed pathology of the outer or middle ear
  • Normal hearing or mild to moderate hearing loss in the non-implanted ear, as defined by a pure-tone average (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) of 55 dB or less
  • Word recognition in the ear to be implanted of 5% or less on CNC word score in quiet
  • Previous experience with an appropriately-fit Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) hearing aid, BI-Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) hearing aid, bone conduction, or traditional hearing aid, as deemed appropriate by investigator
  • Fluent in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Duration of profound hearing loss of 10 years or more
  • Absence of cochlear development or non-functionality of cochlear nerve
  • Other retrocochlear hearing loss
  • Evidence of severe cochlear malformation (i.e., common cavity or ossification)
  • External or middle ear infection
  • Suspected developmental or cognitive concern
  • Other medical contraindication for surgery or anesthesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

WITHDRAWN

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1078, United States

RECRUITING

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

New York, New York, 10003, United States

RECRUITING

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States

RECRUITING

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F, Beck R, Wesarg T. Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. HNO. 2017 Aug;65(Suppl 2):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0297-5.

    PMID: 28188428BACKGROUND
  • Arndt S, Prosse S, Laszig R, Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F. Cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness: does aetiology and duration of deafness matter? Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:21-30. doi: 10.1159/000380744. Epub 2015 May 19.

    PMID: 25999052BACKGROUND
  • Buss E, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518771173. doi: 10.1177/2331216518771173.

    PMID: 29732951BACKGROUND
  • Dillon MT, Buss E, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss. Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):259-271. doi: 10.1159/000484079. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

    PMID: 29298446BACKGROUND
  • Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jan;24(1):73-8. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00015.

    PMID: 12544032BACKGROUND
  • Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D. Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Sep;117(9):645-52. doi: 10.1177/000348940811700903.

    PMID: 18834065BACKGROUND
  • Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P. Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(3):163-71. doi: 10.1159/000171478. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

    PMID: 19005250BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, UnilateralHearing Loss, Sensorineural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing LossHearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2020

First Posted

August 10, 2020

Study Start

February 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations