Comparison the Effects of Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running

NCT04488809 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: DWRVSTR
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 72
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different exercise programs as 'Deep Water Running' and 'Treadmill Running' in sedentary young adults.

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior

Keywords

Exercise; Running; Anaerobic Performance; Agility

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Change in lower extremity anaerobic performance

  The lower extremity anaerobic performance will be measured by using Wingate Anaerobic Capacity Test. The average power (watt, watt/kg), and peak power (watt/watt/kg) will be recorded.

  At baseline and 8 weeks later

Secondary Outcomes (8)

• Change in lower extremity strength

  At baseline and 8 weeks later

• Change in agility

  At baseline and 8 weeks later

• Change in trunk muscle endurance

  At baseline and 8 weeks later

• Change in fatigue

  At baseline and 8 weeks later

• Change in total body mass

  At baseline and 8 weeks later

Study Arms (3)

Deep Water Running

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will perform running in a vertical position in water. The sessions will be held in deep pool where the feet of the participants will not touch the ground.

Other: Exercise

Treadmill Running

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group will perform running on a treadmill.

Other: Exercise

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in this group will not interfere regular exercise for 8 weeks.

Interventions

Exercise OTHER

Exercise sessions will include 10 minutes of warming up, 30 minutes of loading, and 10 minutes of cooling down. The exercises will be performed two times in a week for eight weeks.

Deep Water Running; Treadmill Running

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 30 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Being sedentary according to International Physical Activity Questionnaire
• Consent of the participant

You may not qualify if:

• Problems related to musculoskeletal, neurologic, and cardiopulmonary systems in last six months
• Any contraindication to exercise in water (water fear, allergy to chlorine)
• No willingness to continue in the study

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Izmir Katip Celebi University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (14)

• Kelly BT, Roskin LA, Kirkendall DT, Speer KP. Shoulder muscle activation during aquatic and dry land exercises in nonimpaired subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Apr;30(4):204-10. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.4.204.

  PMID: 10778797 BACKGROUND

• Reichert T, Kanitz AC, Delevatti RS, Bagatini NC, Barroso BM, Kruel LF. Continuous and interval training programs using deep water running improves functional fitness and blood pressure in the older adults. Age (Dordr). 2016 Feb;38(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s11357-016-9882-5. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

  PMID: 26841888 BACKGROUND

• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Buchan J, Arroyo-Morales M. A multimodal physiotherapy programme plus deep water running for improving cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12114. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

  PMID: 23947581 BACKGROUND

• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Adams N, Salazar JA, Belles A, Hazanas S, Arroyo-Morales M. Deep water running and general practice in primary care for non-specific low back pain versus general practice alone: randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Jul;31(7):1073-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1977-5. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

  PMID: 22453844 BACKGROUND

• Wilber RL, Moffatt RJ, Scott BE, Lee DT, Cucuzzo NA. Influence of water run training on the maintenance of aerobic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Aug;28(8):1056-62. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199608000-00017.

  PMID: 8871917 BACKGROUND

• Broman G, Quintana M, Lindberg T, Jansson E, Kaijser L. High intensity deep water training can improve aerobic power in elderly women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Sep;98(2):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0237-2. Epub 2006 Aug 22.

  PMID: 16924529 BACKGROUND

• Bayraktar D, Savci S, Altug-Gucenmez O, Manci E, Makay B, Ilcin N, Unsal E. The effects of 8-week water-running program on exercise capacity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Jan;39(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4209-8. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

  PMID: 30430201 BACKGROUND

• Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;4(6):381-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704060-00001. No abstract available.

  PMID: 3324256 BACKGROUND

• Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90005-8.

  PMID: 9014953 BACKGROUND

• Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.

  PMID: 24301432 BACKGROUND

• McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):941-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90087-4.

  PMID: 10453772 BACKGROUND

• Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, Karabudak R. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007 Mar;30(1):81-5. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4.

  PMID: 17293726 BACKGROUND

• Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Doman D, Murgatroyd PR, Prentice AM. Evaluation of the novel Tanita body-fat analyser to measure body composition by comparison with a four-compartment model. Br J Nutr. 2000 Feb;83(2):115-22. doi: 10.1017/s0007114500000155.

  PMID: 10743490 BACKGROUND

• Vandarakis D, Salacinski AJ, Broeder CE. A comparison of COSMED metabolic systems for the determination of resting metabolic rate. Res Sports Med. 2013;21(2):187-94. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2012.757226.

  PMID: 23541105 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior; Motor Activity

Interventions

Exercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor Activity; Movement; Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

• Deniz Bayraktar, PT, PhD

  Izmir Katip Celebi University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 21, 2020
• First Posted: July 28, 2020
• Study Start: March 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: June 1, 2024
• Study Completion: June 1, 2024
• Last Updated: December 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)