NCT04484727

Brief Summary

Little is known about how lung mechanics are affected during the very early phase after starting mechanical ventilation. Since the conventional method of measuring esophageal pressure is complicated, hard to interpret and expensive, there are no studies on lung mechanics on intensive care patients directly after intubation, during the first hours of ventilator treatment and forward until the ventilator treatment is withdrawn. Published studies have collected data using the standard methods from day 1 to 3 of ventilator treatment for respiratory system mechanics, i.e. the combined mechanics of lung and chest wall. Consequently, information on lung mechanical properties during the first critical hours of ventilator treatment is missing and individualization of ventilator care done on the basis of respiratory system mechanics, which are not representative of lung mechanics on an individual patient basis. We have developed a PEEP-step method based on a change of PEEP up and down in one or two steps, where the change in end-expiratory lung volume ΔEELV) is determined and lung compliance calculated as ΔEELV divided by ΔPEEP (CL = ΔEELV/ΔPEEP). This simple non-invasive method for separating lung and chest wall mechanics provides an opportunity to enhance the knowledge of lung compliance and the transpulmonary pressure. After the two-PEEP-step procedure, the PEEP level where transpulmonary driving pressure is lowest can be calculated for any chosen tidal volume. The aim of the present study in the ICU is to survey lung mechanics from start of mechanical ventilation until extubation and to determine PEEP level with lowest (least injurious) transpulmonary driving pressure during ventilator treatment. The aim of the study during anesthesia in the OR, is to survey lung mechanics in lung healthy and identify patients with lung conditions before anesthesia, which may have an increased risk of postoperative complications.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started May 2022

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress88%
May 2022Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2020

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2022

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 17, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lung-elastance, changes

    Data-collection after intubation, during interventions such as suction, inhalation, posture changes

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Hours/Days of ventilator treatment

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Postoperative complications, ICU-complications

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

ICU-patients in ventilator treatment

Directly after intubation and start of mechanical ventilation, a two-PEEP-step up and down procedure with steps of 5-7 cmH2O each is performed and data on airway pressure and tidal volume changes collected. The data is transferred into a dedicated software for calculation of ΔEELV by cumulative difference in expiratory tidal volume before and during PEEP inflation. Consequently, the lung P/V curve from baseline clinical PEEP to end-inspiration of the highest PEEP level. The PEEP level where clinically used tidal volume has the lowest transpulmonary driving pressure is calculated. A one-PEEP-step procedure with a step of 5-7 cmH2O is performed when clinical events such as disconnection of the breathing circuit, posture changes, suctioning, inhalation, CO2 insufflation etc. is performed, and repeated during the whole period of ventilator treatment.

Other: PEEP-step method

Surgery-patients during general anaesthesia

Directly after intubation and start of mechanical ventilation, a two-PEEP-step up and down procedure with steps of 5-7 cmH2O each, is performed in the same way as described for ICU patients. Data of airway pressure and volumes are transferred into a dedicated software for calculation of ΔEELV by cumulative difference in expiratory tidal volume before and during PEEP inflation. Consequently, the lung P/V curve from baseline clinical PEEP to end-inspiration of the highest PEEP level. The PEEP level where clinically used tidal volume has the lowest transpulmonary driving pressure is calculated. A one-PEEP-step procedure with a step of 5-7 cmH2O is performed when clinical events such as disconnection of the breathing circuit, posture changes or suctioning is performed, and before and after implementation of pneumoperitoneum.

Other: PEEP-step method

Interventions

By changing PEEP in one or two steps up and down, transpulmonary pressure and the lung P/V curve can be determined using a dedicated software collecting data on tidal-volume changes and pressure changes during the PEEP-changes from the standard monitoring equipment or ventilator.

ICU-patients in ventilator treatmentSurgery-patients during general anaesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

ICU-patients or patients in surgery recieving invasive mechancial ventilation.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients above18 years
  • ASA 1-3
  • Planned/acute ventilator treatment in ICU or OR

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under 18 years
  • ASA 4 and above
  • severe COPD/emphysema/heart failure
  • PEEP\>16 and/or FiO2 \>80%
  • elevated intracranial pressure
  • defect coagulation
  • non-treated known or suspected pneumothorax

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sophie Lindgren

Gothenburg, Västra Götaland County, 41345, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Lundin S, Grivans C, Stenqvist O. Transpulmonary pressure and lung elastance can be estimated by a PEEP-step manoeuvre. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Feb;59(2):185-96. doi: 10.1111/aas.12442. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

    PMID: 25443094BACKGROUND
  • Stenqvist O, Grivans C, Andersson B, Lundin S. Lung elastance and transpulmonary pressure can be determined without using oesophageal pressure measurements. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):738-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02696.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.

    PMID: 22524531BACKGROUND
  • Persson P, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Transpulmonary and pleural pressure in a respiratory system model with an elastic recoiling lung and an expanding chest wall. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2016 Dec;4(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40635-016-0103-4. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

    PMID: 27645151BACKGROUND
  • Persson P, Stenqvist O, Lundin S. Evaluation of lung and chest wall mechanics during anaesthesia using the PEEP-step method. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.076. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

    PMID: 29576127BACKGROUND
  • Stenqvist O, Persson P, Stahl CA, Lundin S. Monitoring transpulmonary pressure during anaesthesia using the PEEP-step method. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1373-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Oct 9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30442269BACKGROUND
  • Stenqvist O, Persson P, Lundin S. Can we estimate transpulmonary pressure without an esophageal balloon?-yes. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Oct;6(19):392. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.06.05.

    PMID: 30460266BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Induced Lung InjuryHypoventilationPneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung InjuryLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory InsufficiencyRespiration DisordersSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHealthcare-Associated PneumoniaCross InfectionInfectionsPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsIatrogenic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Bengt Nellgård, Prof

    Sahlgrenska Academy

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Sophie Lindgren, Assoc prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2020

First Posted

July 24, 2020

Study Start

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

March 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations