NCT06026670

Brief Summary

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery is increasingly popular. Recently, a new minimally invasive thoracic approach, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been developed. RATS presents some advantages compared to VATS such as three-dimensional view of the surgical field, its precisions facilitates the navigation in difficult to access spaces and eliminates tremor which reduces learning curve and it may have a reduction of complications. During RATS and differently from VATS, not only one lung ventilation (OLV) is needed but also a continuous tension capnothorax. CO2 insufflation with intrathoracic positive pressure has a potential negative impact on the cardiorespiratory physiology. Moreover, CO2 insufflation and one lung ventilation can produce ventilation induced lung injury which are related to pulmonary postoperative complications (PPC). In order to reduce PPC and ventilation induced lung injury, lung protective strategies are used which reduce atelectrauma and overdistension. These strategies consist of three main pillars: use of low tidal volumes, performance of recruitment maneuvers and application of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, optimal PEEP levels and actual effects of PEEP are not clear. Several clinical studies with one-lung ventilation have reported improved oxygenation and ventilation when an alveolar recruitment maneuver is performed with a standardized PEEP of 5 to 10 cm·H2O. Nevertheless, other studies observe during one-lung ventilation improvements in oxygenation and lung mechanics with individualized PEEP determined by using a PEEP decrement titration trial after an alveolar recruitment maneuver. The effect of a tension capnothorax during RATS may modify pulmonary compliance and optimal PEEP may be different from patients having VATS resection. Even though both methods are habitual in the clinical practice, there are no studies of the effect of an alveolar recruitment maneuver with individualized PEEP during one-lung ventilation in Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS). The investigators hypothesized that such a procedure would improve oxygenation and lung mechanics during one-lung ventilation in RATS compared with the establishment of a standardized PEEP. The investigators perform a descriptive observational prospective study to test this hypothesis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 3, 2023

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 20, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 26, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

July 25, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Optimal PEEPRobotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.Recruitment ManeuversMechanical VentilationOne-lung ventilationCapnothoraxPositive End-Expiratory Pressure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Optimal PEEP

    Assess the improvement of oxygenation, ventilation and lung mechanics in patients ventilated with individualized PEEP during capnothorax.

    4 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Perioperative complications

    7 days

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 120 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

ASA physical status I to III admitted to Hospital Clínic de Barcelona undergoing elective RATS lung resection who agree to participate in the study and sign the written consent form

You may qualify if:

  • ASA physical status I to III
  • Admitted to Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
  • Undergoing elective RATS lung resection
  • Who agree to participate in the study and sign the written consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with age \<18 years
  • ASA physical status IV
  • Pneumonectomy
  • New York Heart Association III to IV
  • Preoperative hemoglobin \<10 mg/dL will be excluded from the study.
  • Patients in which recruitment maneuvers are contraindicated (history of pneumothorax, contralateral pulmonary bulla, hemodynamic instability, lung emphysema, COPD, bronchopleural fistula, acute cor pulmonale or intracranial hypertension).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ricard Navarro

Barcelona, 08036, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung InjuryLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
7 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2023

First Posted

September 7, 2023

Study Start

July 3, 2023

Primary Completion

February 20, 2024

Study Completion

February 26, 2024

Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations