Quality Improvement Project - "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!"; ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!")
A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!" ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!") Development and Evaluation of a Consensus and Evidence Based Psychosocial Therapy Tool in a Preliminary Psychosocial Study on Therapy Optimization.
1 other identifier
interventional
240
4 countries
22
Brief Summary
In this study, the main goal is to implement and evaluate a novel, evidence-based psycho-educative program for children in oncological care. Patients are provided with booklets tailored to each specific stage of their treatment. Among other factors, children's emotional well-being is evaluated as well as feasibility. The study is carried out at multiple sites across Austria, Germany and Italy/South Tirol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJanuary 9, 2024
January 1, 2024
3.3 years
June 23, 2020
January 7, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Emotional well-being, T1
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T2
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T3
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T4
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T5
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T1
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T2
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T3
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T4
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T5
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Feasibility of program
Rating of feasibility of the program by medical staff
Feasibility of program is evaluated following the second session which on average takes place one to six months after start of the treatment of the special issue (booklet). - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Intelligence test
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1999)
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
KINDLR (Ravens-Sieberer & Bullinger, 2000)
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Questionnaire on Health Competence in Children and Adolescents, (Weiler, Fohn, Pletschko, Schwarzinger, & Leiss, 2017)
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Medical information
Within the first week of treatment - up to three Months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
All Patients
OTHERSince this is a single-group study, all patients are within the same arm
Interventions
Special issues/booklets of "My Logbook - I know my way around!" - Every booklet is based on evidence-based interventions. It illustrates psychosocial and interdisciplinary processes in a standardized way, resulting in a practical guide ("My Logbook") to accompany the child throughout all stages of oncological treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- currently or formerly treated for oncological condition
- children/families at standard risk (Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM))
- at least average cognitive abilities (as measured via intelligence test)
- currently or formerly treated for oncological condition
You may not qualify if:
- non-German speaking
- Major vision impairments
- Major auditive impairments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Viennalead
- St. Anna Kinderspital, Austriacollaborator
- Charite University, Berlin, Germanycollaborator
- Cnopfsche Kinderklinik, Nürnbergcollaborator
- Kepler University Hospitalcollaborator
- University Hospital, Saarlandcollaborator
- Hannover Medical Schoolcollaborator
- Krankenhaus Bozencollaborator
- Goethe Universitycollaborator
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorfcollaborator
- Universitätsklinikum Leipzigcollaborator
- University Hospital Muenstercollaborator
- University Hospital Tuebingencollaborator
- Salzburger Landesklinikencollaborator
- Leuwaldhof St.Veit (Kinder- und Jugendreha)collaborator
- University Hospital, Essencollaborator
- Medical University of Grazcollaborator
- University Hospital Erlangencollaborator
- Wuerzburg University Hospitalcollaborator
- Klinik Bad Oexen, Germanycollaborator
- Universitätsklinikum Kölncollaborator
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holsteincollaborator
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Caruscollaborator
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheimcollaborator
- University Hospital Regensburgcollaborator
- Luca-Dethlefsen-Hilfe e.V.collaborator
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Berncollaborator
- Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhecollaborator
Study Sites (22)
Rehabilitationszentrum St. Veit im Pongau
Sankt Veit im Pongau, Salzburg, 5621, Austria
Kepler Universitätsklinikum
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021, Austria
Medical University Graz
Graz, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
St. Anna Kinderspital
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590, Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg, Saarland, 66421, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany
Klinik Bad Oexen
Bad Oeynhausen, 32549, Germany
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Luca-Dethlefsen-Hilfe e.V.
Bielefeld, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
Dresden, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Mannheim, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Regensburg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Tübingen, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, Germany
Ospedale di Bolzano
Bolzano, Trentino-Alto Adige, 39100, Italy
Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, Switzerland
Related Publications (9)
Kazak AE, Abrams AN, Banks J, Christofferson J, DiDonato S, Grootenhuis MA, Kabour M, Madan-Swain A, Patel SK, Zadeh S, Kupst MJ. Psychosocial Assessment as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Dec;62 Suppl 5:S426-59. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25730.
PMID: 26700916BACKGROUNDScialla MA, Canter KS, Chen FF, Kolb EA, Sandler E, Wiener L, Kazak AE. Delivery of care consistent with the psychosocial standards in pediatric cancer: Current practices in the United States. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Mar;65(3):10.1002/pbc.26869. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26869. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
PMID: 29080381BACKGROUNDBaxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E, Booth A. The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 10;18(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3.
PMID: 29747651BACKGROUNDSchurman JV, Gayes LA, Slosky L, Hunter ME, Pino FA. Publishing quality improvement work in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology: The "why" and "how to". Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology. 2015 Mar; 3(1):80.
BACKGROUNDSchröder HM, Lilienthal S, Schreiber-Gollwitzer BM, Griessmeier B, Leiss U. Psychosoziale Versorgung in der Pädiatrischen Onkologie und Hämatologie. PSAPOH (Hg.). 2013.
BACKGROUNDStuber ML, Meeske KA, Krull KR, Leisenring W, Stratton K, Kazak AE, Huber M, Zebrack B, Uijtdehaage SH, Mertens AC, Robison LL, Zeltzer LK. Prevalence and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1124-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2308.
PMID: 20435702BACKGROUNDKoch U, Mehnert A, Harter M. [Chronic somatic disorders and psychological comorbidity]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Jan;54(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1196-7. No abstract available. German.
PMID: 21246321BACKGROUNDWeiler-Wichtl LJ, Fohn-Erhold V, Rosenmayr V, Hansl R, Hopfgartner M, Pal-Handl K, Wasinger-Brandweiner V, Herzog K, Neumann K, Schellenberg T, Schonenberger-Loppacher D, Faist-Schweika C, Schonthaler B, Budich M, Stember N, Wiegele K, Reddig M, Paduch A, Lein-Kohler I, Gorgen S, Wienands H, Gauf H, Hoffmann R, Kollmann A, Just U, Salzmann N, Neunsinger P, Gerhardt M, Essl S, Borbely J, Kopper M, Rinner S, Schubert L, Leiss U. Benefits of applying standardized frameworks to implement psychosocial tools such as the 'My Logbook'. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 14;32(12):789. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08981-7.
PMID: 39538073DERIVEDWeiler-Wichtl LJ, Fohn-Erhold V, Rosenmayr V, Hansl R, Hopfgartner M, Fries J, Schneider C, Herzog K, Schellenberg T, Schonthaler B, Stember N, Lein-Kohler I, Hoffmann R, Kollmann A, Salzmann N, Essl S, Pal-Handl K, Wasinger-Brandweiner V, Rinner S, Schubert L, Lange S, Leiss U. Preparing Children for Invasive Medical Cancer Treatment with "My Logbook": Preliminary Results of a Pilot Study. J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb;40(1):132-141. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02481-2. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
PMID: 39107671DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Project Coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2020
First Posted
July 17, 2020
Study Start
September 7, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
January 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share