NCT04466488

Brief Summary

Background: Clinical guidelines and policies often fail to achieve high levels of delivery of intended clinical interventions. The difference in what the investigators know works and what is actually delivered at the clinic-level to patients, is known as the "science-to-service gap." In the realm of tuberculosis (TB) prevention, this gap is reflected in \<20% of TB preventive therapy (TPT) -eligible persons living with HIV (PWH) being offered or initiated on isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) in many settings. Recent innovation in TPT have brought new pharmacological options allowing for shorter courses, intermittent dosing, or both. The overarching goal of this study is to identify a generalizable approach to overcome current barriers to delivery of TPT in order to achieve high levels of TPT delivery during routine care in public clinics. Multiple approaches are in standard use to change prescribing behavior including in service training, audit and feedback, clinical mentoring, the use of clinical decision aids, and "academic detailing." However, the overall change is generally modest. To achieve a substantial increase in TPT delivery (from current approximately 20% to 60-80%) will require a fundamental change in the approach to selecting patients for TPT - a redesign of the choice architecture of TPT prescribing. Methods: The investigators are proposing a choice architecture that makes prescribing TPT the "default" or standard option and that for TPT not to be prescribed will require a choice by a clinician to "opt-out" of TPT for a specific patient. The investigators are proposing a cluster randomized design to test the choice architecture approach to increasing delivery of TPT. Clinics will be randomized to one of two strategies: (1) standard implementation and (2) choice architecture default TPT. Because of the clinic-level nature of the implementation strategies, all PWH receiving care at a clinic will be exposed to the standard implementation or TPT routinization implementation. Clinical process data will be used to assess the effectiveness of each strategy to determine the proportion of PWH (1) screened for TPT, (2) eligible for TPT, and (3) prescribed TPT. Significance: TB is the leading cause of death among PWH in South Africa and elsewhere on the continent. TPT is a proven intervention to reduce mortality among PWH but is not widely prescribed. This study seeks to identify an implementation strategy to reach optimal TPT prescribing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50,798

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2021

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

July 7, 2020

Results QC Date

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

TB preventive therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Patients Newly Starting ART Also Initiating TPT Within 90 Days of ART Initiation

    Comparing choice architecture and standard of care prescribing arms

    Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Established ART Patients Also Initiating TPT

    Up to 12 months

  • Percentage of TPT-eligible Patients Newly Starting ART Also Initiating TPT Within 90 Days of ART Initiation

    Up to 12 months

  • Percentage of TPT-eligible Established ART Patients Also Initiating TPT

    Up to 12 months

  • Percentage of Patients Started on TPT With Subsequent Discontinuation

    Up to 12 months

  • Clinic Implementation of Choice Architecture as Assessed by Adoption

    Up to 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Standard of care study arm

NO INTERVENTION

The standard TPT implementation is for a clinician to screen for TB and to consider TPT for those who do not have "presumptive TB". Clinicians in the study district (and most districts in South Africa) have received training and job aids to assist in appropriate application of the TPT initiation algorithm. Prescribing for TPT and ART is done by writing, by hand, the prescription in the patient's paper file. As part of this study, all study clinic providers will have access to standard Department of Health printed material and clinical training.

Choice Architecture study arm

EXPERIMENTAL

In the choice architecture implementation strategy, all opt-out clinic providers and pharmacists will be trained on the approach. The fundamental tenant of this approach is that TPT will be prescribed with any ART initiation and any ART re-prescribing for 3-12 months of TPT (adherent to current guidelines) if TPT has not been previously prescribed. This will be facilitated by co-prescribing ART and TPT. That is when ART is being prescribed TPT is meant to be prescribed at the same time of the clinic visit. The simultaneous prescribing will be facilitated through the introduction of an ink stamp or pre-printed sticker to use for quick entry of the ART prescription along with TPT and cotrimoxazole. The stamp/sticker for ART prescription, the prescription for TPT and for cotrimoxazole will be "automatically" included. Active canceling of these prescriptions (and indicating the reasons) will be needed to not have TPT dispensed.

Behavioral: Choice Architecture

Interventions

1. Providers will receive general training on TPT benefits, indications, and contra-indications. 2. Providers will be provided with updated ART and TPT prescribing approach, including an ink stamp or pre-printed sticker for quick entry of the ART prescription along with TPT and cotrimoxazole. 3. The pharmacy or clinician (if the clinician dispenses) will dispense ART, cotrimoxazole, and TPT as prescribed

Choice Architecture study arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (≥18 years old) patients initiating ART
  • Adult (≥18 years old) patients already on ART and coming for ART re-prescribing

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Perinatal HIV Research Unit

Soweto, Gauteng, 1864, South Africa

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeTuberculosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HIV InfectionsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesSlow Virus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System DiseasesMycobacterium InfectionsActinomycetales InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and Mycoses

Results Point of Contact

Title
Christopher Hoffmann
Organization
Johns Hopkins University

Study Officials

  • Christopher Hoffmann, MD, MPH

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The data identified by clinic allocation will be blinded to the PI and co-investigators and study statistician until completion of comparative analysis. There will be no other blinding.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The investigators will conduct a covariate-constrained randomization to balance, if an imbalance is detected, ensuring validity of the randomization process. Implementation will be staggered over time, with each of two clinics from the intervention arms matched to control clinics for the purpose of contemporaneous study initiation. Randomization will occur either electronically or through drawing names with Department of Health representatives.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2020

First Posted

July 10, 2020

Study Start

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion

November 1, 2024

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Results First Posted

March 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified trial data will be made available one year after completion of all study activities.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
One year after completion of study activities
Access Criteria
Contact PI

Locations