Post-endodontic Pain Survey
Postoperative Pain After One-visit Root Canal Treatment on Teeth With Vital Pulps: Comparison of Two Different Root Filling Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
194
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
As part of root canal treatment, canals should be sealed to prevent further contaminations. There are multiple accepted techniques to fill-obturate canals. In the past, different obturation techniques have been compared. The most current technique used, a single cone with bioceramic sealer, has not been compared. This clinical investigation will compare the postoperative pain of this technique to another common technique used in our clinic. Postoperative pain after one-visit root-canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: Comparison of three different obturation techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 24, 2020
CompletedOctober 1, 2020
September 1, 2020
1.5 years
June 24, 2020
July 9, 2020
September 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Patients were asked to rate the intensity of preoperative pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever) before receiving root canal treatment. At the end of the visit, the patients were given a survey and asked to rate the intensity of postoperative pain (VAS 0-10) at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the procedure.
4-, 24-, and 48-hour after receiving root canal treatment
Study Arms (2)
Obturation technique: WVT
EXPERIMENTALWarm vertical compaction technique (WVT): Teeth filled with AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer were filled with .04 taper gutta-percha points by WVT. The sealer was introduced with the master cone. The depth of heated plugger was within 3-5 mm of WL in the WVT group, and the remaining canal space was backfilled with additional sealer and thermoplasticized gutta-percha.
Obturation technique: SBT
ACTIVE COMPARATORSealer-based filling technique (SBT): Teeth filled with SBT were obturated with EndoSequence BC Sealer by injecting the sealer into the coronal third of each canal. Size 30 Lentulo spiral coated with additional sealer was introduced 3 mm short of WL depth at 300rpm. Bioceramic coated gutta-percha was dipped in BC sealer and introduced into the canal to WL. A heated plugger was used to sear the gutta-percha point at each orifice.
Interventions
All eligible teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% Sodium hypochlorite was used as the main irrigant with a 31-gauge needle. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth. WVT was used to fill the tooth when the months were January, March, May, July, September, and November.
All eligible teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% Sodium hypochlorite was used as the main irrigant with a 31-gauge needle. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth. SBT was used to fill the tooth when the months were February, April, June, August, October, and December.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis according to AAE consensus. The diagnosis was based on clinical examinations and confirmed upon accessing the teeth.
- Consenting adults age 18 years and older
- Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I \& II)
- Included patients were given oral and written information agreed for participation and signed the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Non-consenting patients and patients below 18 years of age
- Medical history with ASA Class III \& IV
- Non-restorable teeth
- Teeth with a non-vital pulp
- Periodontal probing depths were more than 4mm
- Pre-medication with antibiotics and/or analgesics 24 hours before the treatment
- Patients taking analgesics routinely for non-dental reasons
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Yu YH, Kushnir L, Kohli M, Karabucak B. Comparing the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal filling with warm vertical obturation with resin-based sealer and sealer-based obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):5033-5042. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03814-x. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
PMID: 33555456DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ya-Hsin Yu
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 1, 2020
Results First Posted
July 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09