NCT04462731

Brief Summary

As part of root canal treatment, canals should be sealed to prevent further contaminations. There are multiple accepted techniques to fill-obturate canals. In the past, different obturation techniques have been compared. The most current technique used, a single cone with bioceramic sealer, has not been compared. This clinical investigation will compare the postoperative pain of this technique to another common technique used in our clinic. Postoperative pain after one-visit root-canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: Comparison of three different obturation techniques.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
194

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2020

Results QC Date

July 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 11, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Postoperative PainBioceramicRoot canal filling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Patients were asked to rate the intensity of preoperative pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever) before receiving root canal treatment. At the end of the visit, the patients were given a survey and asked to rate the intensity of postoperative pain (VAS 0-10) at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the procedure.

    4-, 24-, and 48-hour after receiving root canal treatment

Study Arms (2)

Obturation technique: WVT

EXPERIMENTAL

Warm vertical compaction technique (WVT): Teeth filled with AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer were filled with .04 taper gutta-percha points by WVT. The sealer was introduced with the master cone. The depth of heated plugger was within 3-5 mm of WL in the WVT group, and the remaining canal space was backfilled with additional sealer and thermoplasticized gutta-percha.

Procedure: Non-surgical root canal treatment filled with WVT

Obturation technique: SBT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sealer-based filling technique (SBT): Teeth filled with SBT were obturated with EndoSequence BC Sealer by injecting the sealer into the coronal third of each canal. Size 30 Lentulo spiral coated with additional sealer was introduced 3 mm short of WL depth at 300rpm. Bioceramic coated gutta-percha was dipped in BC sealer and introduced into the canal to WL. A heated plugger was used to sear the gutta-percha point at each orifice.

Procedure: Non-surgical root canal treatment filled with SBT

Interventions

All eligible teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% Sodium hypochlorite was used as the main irrigant with a 31-gauge needle. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth. WVT was used to fill the tooth when the months were January, March, May, July, September, and November.

Obturation technique: WVT

All eligible teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% Sodium hypochlorite was used as the main irrigant with a 31-gauge needle. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth. SBT was used to fill the tooth when the months were February, April, June, August, October, and December.

Obturation technique: SBT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis according to AAE consensus. The diagnosis was based on clinical examinations and confirmed upon accessing the teeth.
  • Consenting adults age 18 years and older
  • Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I \& II)
  • Included patients were given oral and written information agreed for participation and signed the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-consenting patients and patients below 18 years of age
  • Medical history with ASA Class III \& IV
  • Non-restorable teeth
  • Teeth with a non-vital pulp
  • Periodontal probing depths were more than 4mm
  • Pre-medication with antibiotics and/or analgesics 24 hours before the treatment
  • Patients taking analgesics routinely for non-dental reasons

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Yu YH, Kushnir L, Kohli M, Karabucak B. Comparing the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal filling with warm vertical obturation with resin-based sealer and sealer-based obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):5033-5042. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03814-x. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeDental Pulp DiseasesBites and Stings

Interventions

Serum Bactericidal Test

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Microbial Sensitivity TestsMicrobiological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative TechniquesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEvaluation Studies as Topic

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ya-Hsin Yu
Organization
University of Pennsylvania

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Non-surgical root canal treatment: All teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% NaOCl was used as the main irrigant. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2020

First Posted

July 8, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2018

Study Completion

May 1, 2018

Last Updated

October 1, 2020

Results First Posted

July 24, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09