Comparison of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different irrigation activation methods on postoperative pain using visual analog scale (VAS) using Xp-endo Finisher, EndoActivator and Passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques with traditional irrigation method. In this study, Traditional Irrigation (GI), Xp-endo Finisher (XPF), Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), EndoActivator (EA) techniques will be used for irrigation activation. Twenty-five maxillary or mandibular single root and canal-shaped nonvital teeth will used in each group. Root canals will be prepared with TF-Adaptive system. Four different activation techniques will be applied during final irrigation. The canal treatments will be completed in one stage and postoperative pain analysis will be taken with VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scale after 12-24-48 hours. Statistical analysis will be performed with Mann Whitney-U test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2020
CompletedFebruary 10, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.7 years
February 5, 2020
February 7, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of postoperative after endodontic treatment
The incidence and severity of pain will be evaluated by using visual analog scale (VAS). The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, whislt 10 means unbearable pain.
0-48 hours
Study Arms (1)
irrigation activation method
OTHERIrrigation activation is a crucial stage of root canal treatment. Therefore, the effect of activation methods on post treatment is an important fact for the comfort of patients.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- nonvital tooth
- single rooted tooth
You may not qualify if:
- tooth not requiring root canal treatment
- patients under 18 years old
- vital tooth
- tooth having more than 1 canal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry
Zonguldak, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2020
First Posted
February 10, 2020
Study Start
January 5, 2017
Primary Completion
September 14, 2019
Study Completion
September 14, 2019
Last Updated
February 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share