Double Lock Versus Continuous Non-locking Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Cesarean Sections on Post-operative Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this trial we compare the effect of 2 closure techniques of the rectus sheath during cesarean sections on postoperative pain. One closure technique is double lock technique and the other is the conventional continuous non-locking technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 1, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.3 years
February 7, 2016
July 30, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postoperative pain evaluated by VAS
first week postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
operative time
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
group a
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with double locking technique for closure of Rectus Sheath.
group b
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with continuous non-locking technique for closure of rectus sheath.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- first cesarean section
You may not qualify if:
- urgent cesarean section
- previous abdominal surgery
- previous cesarean section
- obstetric and medical complications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2016
First Posted
February 10, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07