Efficacy Analysis in Long Term of Radiofrecuency Combined vs. T.E. in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Analysis of the Efficacy in the Lomg Term (Six Months Follow up) of the Combination of Radiofrecuency and Therapeutic Exercise Versus Therapeutic Exercise Alone in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aims to promote research in the field of Physiotherapy, focusing on a health problem of maximum relevance, such as patellofemoral pain syndrome. Although these treatments seem to be based on theoretical reasoning, the evidence for the efficacy of these interventions is not well established. Therefore, we select from among all the therapeutic tools available in physiotherapy, a procedure of therapeutic physical exercise. Main objectives: To know the efficacy of a therapeutic physical exercise protocol in the reduction of pain and the improvement of functional disability in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Secondary objectives:
- Quantify the reduction of pain in the anterior aspect of the knee in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), after treatment with monopolar capacitive diathermy by radiofrequency.
- To evaluate the improvement of functional disability in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), after treatment with monopolar capacitive diathermy by radiofrequency. Study hypothesis: The treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) with a therapeutic physical exercise protocol produces statistically significant changes in the reduction of pain and functional disability and the normalization of the anthropometric values of the joint balance of the knee
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedAugust 17, 2020
August 1, 2020
6 months
June 26, 2020
August 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA).
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA). This variable has been obtained through a validated scale of 10 centimeters (0-10), where the subject self-positioned from absence of pain to the worst bearable pain.
Time point 1: before the intervention
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA).
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA). This variable has been obtained through a validated scale of 10 centimeters (0-10), where the subject self-positioned from absence of pain to the worst bearable pain.
Time point 2: when the intervention was finished (after 10 sesions : 2 weeks)
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA).
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA). This variable has been obtained through a validated scale of 10 centimeters (0-10), where the subject self-positioned from absence of pain to the worst bearable pain.
Time point 3: six months later the initial evaluation.
Kujala Score.
The functional disability, quantified by means of the tests: Kujala Score.
Time point 1: before the intervention
Kujala Score.
The functional disability, quantified by means of the tests: Kujala Score.
Time point 2: when the intervention was finished (after 10 sesions : 2 weeks)
Kujala Score.
The functional disability, quantified by means of the tests: Kujala Score.
Time point 3: six months later the initial evaluation.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement
Time point 1: before the intervention.
Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement
Time point 2: when the intervention was finished (after 10 sesions : 2 weeks)
Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement
Time point 3: six months later the initial evaluation.
Study Arms (2)
CONTROL GROUP:
ACTIVE COMPARATORYou will be provided exclusively therapeutic exercises protocol to develop in the home setting that you must perform following a daily activity for three weeks.
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
EXPERIMENTALAfter the initial evaluation, the first 10 treatment sessions will be developed at the rate of five daily sessions in the first week, three sessions on alternate days in the second week and two sessions on alternate days in the third week (3 weeks in total), applying the monopolar capacitive diathermy with radiofrequency in the anterior aspect of the knee, in dynamic application in one of the members: affect or randomized (uni or bilateral pathology, respectively). This diathermy will be combined with a therapeutic exercise program supervised by a Physiotherapist. The treatment is administered with a pulsatile short-wave equipment and inductive electrodes of 100 W peak power, with a frequency of application of twice daily with a dose submitis (grade I), for 10 min, with a frequency of repetition of the impulses of 46 Hz and a pulse duration of 0.2 ms.
Interventions
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP: After the initial evaluation, the first 10 treatment sessions will be developed at the rate of five daily sessions in the first week, three sessions on alternate days in the second week and two sessions on alternate days in the third week (3 weeks in total), applying the monopolar capacitive diathermy with radiofrequency in the anterior aspect of the knee, in dynamic application in one of the members: affect or randomized (uni or bilateral pathology, respectively). This diathermy will be combined with a therapeutic exercise program supervised by a Physiotherapist.
CONTROL GROUP: will be provided exclusively therapeutic exercises protocol to develop in the home setting that you must perform following a daily activity for three weeks. They will be evaluated at the end of that period and six moths later in order to have at least three timepoints to evaluate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication for the use of MDR.
- Present cognitive alterations.
- Have undergone conservative or surgical treatment of the knee in less than 6 months.
- Having received injections of corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid; impaired cognition or communication; and be involved in an ongoing medical-legal dispute.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cristo Jesús Barrios Quinta
Seville, 41008, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share