Tibiofemoral Mobilization in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Effects of Tibiofemoral Mobilization in Patients of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this research was to determine the effects of tibiofemoral joint mobilization in patients of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Tibiofemoral joint mobilization effects on pain and Range of Motion (ROM) in knee joint. A randomized controlled trial was done at Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar and Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar. The sample size was 52. The Participants were divided into two groups, 26 participants in experimental group and 26 in control group. The study duration was 4 months. Sampling technique applied was purposive non probability sampling technique. Only 25 to 35 years participants with patellofemoral pain syndrome were included. Tools used in this study were Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Kujala Score Questionnaire, Goniometer and Algometer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedJanuary 23, 2020
January 1, 2020
5 months
January 8, 2020
January 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Changes from base Line Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain
4th week
Range Of Motion of Knee Joint (Flexion)
Changes from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of knee joint flexion was taken with the Help of Goniometer
4th week
Range Of Motion of Knee Joint (Extension)
Changes from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of knee joint extension was taken with the Help of Goniometer
4th week
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Changes from the Baseline Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) were taken with the help of Algometer
4th week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale
4th week
Study Arms (2)
Exercise Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHip \& Knee Exercises
Mobilization Group
EXPERIMENTALTibiofemoral joint anterior-posterior mobilization combined Hip \& Knee Exercises
Interventions
Control group included 6 different exercises to treat participants having PFPS. These exercises included Semi squat with hip adduction and internal rotation, Quads isometrics, Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Hamstring Stretch, Terminal knee extension with elastic band , Adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball), Hip abduction in standing with elastic band. These all exercises were advised to perform 3 x 15 Repetitions with 10 sec hold. This exercise protocol was for 4 weeks and 3 sessions per week.
Experimental group included Anterior-Posterior (AP) tibiofemoral joint mobilization and all 6 exercises suggested controlled group for treating participants having PFPS; 3 sessions of mobilizations per week and total 4 weeks. These exercises included Semi squat with hip adduction and internal rotation, Quads isometrics, Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Hamstring Stretch, Terminal knee extension with elastic band , Adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball), Hip abduction in standing with elastic band. Theses all exercises were advised to perform 3 x 15 Repetitions with 10 sec hold. This protocol was for 4 weeks and 3 sessions per week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptoms of anterior knee pain for at least 1 month.
- Anterior or retropatellar knee pain on at least 2 of the following activities: prolonged sitting, climbing stairs, squatting, running, kneeling, and hopping/jumping.
- Presence of 2 of the following clinical criteria on assessment: pain during apprehension test, pain during the patellar compression test, and crepitation during the compression test.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous knee surgery or arthritis
- History of patellar dislocation or subluxation, malalignment, or ligament laxity
- Spinal referred pain
- History of other abnormalities such as leg length inequalities (.2 cm)
- Medication as a part of the treatment
- Previous physical therapy or acupuncture treatment for the knee within the previous 30 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lady Reading Hospital
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25000, Pakistan
Related Publications (7)
Collins NJ, Barton CJ, van Middelkoop M, Callaghan MJ, Rathleff MS, Vicenzino BT, Davis IS, Powers CM, Macri EM, Hart HF, de Oliveira Silva D, Crossley KM. 2018 Consensus statement on exercise therapy and physical interventions (orthoses, taping and manual therapy) to treat patellofemoral pain: recommendations from the 5th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Gold Coast, Australia, 2017. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;52(18):1170-1178. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099397. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
PMID: 29925502BACKGROUNDBriani RV, Pazzinatto MF, De Oliveira Silva D, Azevedo FM. Different pain responses to distinct levels of physical activity in women with patellofemoral pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
PMID: 28460712BACKGROUNDCrossley KM, van Middelkoop M, Callaghan MJ, Collins NJ, Rathleff MS, Barton CJ. 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 2: recommended physical interventions (exercise, taping, bracing, foot orthoses and combined interventions). Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):844-52. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096268. Epub 2016 May 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 27247098BACKGROUNDSantos TR, Oliveira BA, Ocarino JM, Holt KG, Fonseca ST. Effectiveness of hip muscle strengthening in patellofemoral pain syndrome patients: a systematic review. Braz J Phys Ther. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):167-76. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0089. Epub 2015 May 29.
PMID: 26039034BACKGROUNDDemirci S, Kinikli GI, Callaghan MJ, Tunay VB. Comparison of short-term effects of mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patellofemoral pain. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
PMID: 29054803BACKGROUNDLantz JM, Emerson-Kavchak AJ, Mischke JJ, Courtney CA. TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT MOBILIZATION IN THE SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jun;11(3):450-61.
PMID: 27274430BACKGROUNDFatimah I, Waqqar S. Effects of tibiofemoral mobilization in patients of Patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;71(11):2506-2510. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.04-585.
PMID: 34783726DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Saira Waqqar, PP-DPT
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2020
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
June 15, 2019
Primary Completion
November 8, 2019
Study Completion
January 7, 2020
Last Updated
January 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share