Plane Block vs Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia
Randomized Controlled Comparison of the Erector Spina Plane Block and Modified Thoracolumbar Interfacial Plane Block and Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute postoperative pain begins with surgical trauma and decreases with tissue healing. Untreatable postoperative pain is one of the most important problems due to the increase in respiratory, cardiac and thromboembolic complications. Lumber disc surgery is widely performed, and patients often complain of postoperative pain. Preventing and managing postoperative pain after lumber disc surgery is very important for anesthetists. For this purpose, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, intravenous opioids, preemptive analgesia methods, intravenous patient controlled analgesia methods and regional anesthesia techniques are used within the multimodal analgesia strategy. Regional anesthesia techniques are becoming increasingly widespread due to their efficiency and increased applicability thanks to the use of ultrasonography. Regional anesthesia techniques used in lumber disc surgery include paravertebral block, local anesthetic infiltration, epidural analgesia, and erector spina plan block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plan block in recent years. The erector spina plane block was first described in 2016, and the thoracolumbar interfacial plane block in 2015, and its modification was developed in 2017. Although they vary depending on the level of application, they offer analgesic activity in a wide range. Although there are publications about the use of these blocks for postoperative analgesia after lumber surgeries, which block is more effective has not been investigated. This study may contribute to the development of new options for pain management after lumber disc surgery by comparing erector spina plane block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block, which have recently been used for postoperative pain treatment, with limited research, with each other and the standard technique, intravenous patient controlled analgesia, can add new applications to multimodal analgesia methods, increase patient satisfaction and contribute to the early recovery process. The objective is to compare the erector spina plane block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block in patients undergoing lumber disc surgery with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in terms of analgesic efficacy. Hypothesis The erector spina plane block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block may decrease the postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption and time to first analgesic requirement compared with intravenous patient controlled analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 9, 2020
June 1, 2020
2 months
June 26, 2020
November 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Pain score
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
10 minutes after extubation
Pain score
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 1st hour
Pain score
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 2nd hour
Pain score
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 4th hour
Pain score
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 12th hour
Pain score
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 24th hour
Tramadol consumption
Tramadol consumption will be determined from the ambulatory infusion pump (Abott)
postoperative 24th hour
Time to first analgesia request
Time to first tramadol request will be determined from the ambulatory infusion pump (Abott)
10 minutes after extubation
Study Arms (3)
Erector spina plane block (ESP)
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive Erector spina plane block (ESP) with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia
Modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block (MTI)
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive Modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block (MTI) with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia
Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with tramadol for postoperative analgesia
Interventions
Patient will receive ultrasound guided regional anesthesia with bupivacaine and intravenous patient controlled analgesia with tramadol
Patient will receive ultrasound guided regional anesthesia with bupivacaine and intravenous patient controlled analgesia with tramadol
Patient will receive intravenous patient controlled analgesia with tramadol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing elective lumber discectomy or laminectomy
- Adults
- Aged 18-65
- America Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Chronic pain condition
- Allergic to study drugs
- Recurrent surgical cases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and Research Hospital
Ankara, 06110, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDHand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1196-200. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
PMID: 26149600BACKGROUNDUeshima H, Hara E, Otake H. RETRACTED: Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block provides effective perioperative pain relief for patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery; a prospective, randomized and double blinded trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Dec;58:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
PMID: 31029989RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ÜNAL Dr YAZICIOĞLU, Assoc Prof
DISKAPI YILDIRIM BEYAZIT TEACHING HOSPITAL
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Postoperative pain will be assessed by an anaesthesiologist unaware of group assignment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2020
First Posted
July 7, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share