HFNC and NIV for COVID-19 Complicated by Respiratory Failure
The Safety of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation for Treatment of Patients With COVID-19 Complicated by Respiratory Failure
1 other identifier
observational
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Patients with COVID-19 have a range of clinical spectrum from asymptomatic infection, mild illness, moderate infection requiring supplemental oxygen and severe infection requiring intensive care support. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may offer respiratory support to patients with COVID-19 complicated by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure if conventional oxygen therapy (COT) fails to maintain satisfactory oxygenation but whether these respiratory therapies would lead to airborne viral transmission is unknown. Aims: This study examines whether SARS-2 virus can be detected in small particles in the hospital isolation rooms in patients who receive a) HFNC, b) NIV via oronasal masks and c) conventional nasal cannula for respiratory failure. Method: A field test to be performed at the Prince of Wales hospital ward 12C single bed isolation room with 12 air changes/hr on patients (n=5 for each category of respiratory therapy) with confirmed COVID-19 who require treatment for respiratory failure with a) HFNC up to 60L/min, b) NIV via oronasal masks and c) conventional nasal cannula up to 5L/min of oxygen. While the patient is on respiratory support, we would position 3 stationary devices in the isolation room (one next to each side of the bed and another at the end of the bed) of the patient with confirmed COVID-19 infection, and sample the air for four hours continuously. Results \& implications: If air sampling RTPCR and viral culture is positive, this would objectively confirm that HFNC and NIV require airborne precaution by healthcare workers during application.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedJuly 25, 2022
July 1, 2022
1.9 years
June 29, 2020
July 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
detection of viral RNA from one or more participants' air samples
quantitative RTPCR from air samples
within 4 hours after starting respiratory therapy
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the nasopharyngeal flocked swab and throat swab viral load (log10 copies/mL)
up to 2 weeks
Study Arms (3)
HFNC at 30-60L/min
HFNC at 50-60L/min with humidification at 37C (Airvo 2, Fisher \& Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) will be applied for patients with moderate type 1 respiratory failure
NIV
NIV (Respironics V60) via oronasal mask (Quattro, ResMed) will be reserved for patients with type 2 respiratory failure
Conventional nasal oxygen
Oxygen 1-5 L/min via nasal cannula for those with mild type 1 respiratory failure
Interventions
HFNV vs NIV vs conventional nasal cannula
Eligibility Criteria
This is a field test being conducted at the Prince of Wales hospital ward 12C single bed isolation room with 12 air changes per hr on patients (n=5 for each category of respiratory therapy) with confirmed COVID-19 who require treatment for respiratory failure with a) HFNC up to 60L/min, b) NIV via oronasal masks and c) conventional nasal cannula up to 5L/min of oxygen. Five patients in each treatment category will be recruited as the majority (80%) of confirmed cases in HK have been mild without respiratory failure.
You may not qualify if:
- inability to provide consent;
- severe respiratory failure requiring invasive ventilatory support;
- septic shock
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- Health and Medical Research Fundcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Biospecimen
NIOSH air samplers are located around the sampling bed ('Centre'), on the side of the sampling bed ('Side'), or relocated during the period of the sampling and application of each respiratory therapy. Air is collected at 3.5L/minute into three size fractions: \>4μm (collected in a 15ml tube), 1-4μm (1.5ml tube) and \<1μm (by a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filter with 3.0μm pore size). All the tubes are then transported to the laboratory at 4°C, vortexed, and the VTM is aliquoted and stored at -80°C for subsequent laboratory analysis by RT-PCR. Viral loads will be measured from the patient's upper respiratory tract (nasopharyngeal flocked swab and throat swab) on admission and serially second daily during hospitalization by means of quantitative RT-PCR assay.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David S Hui, MD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2020
First Posted
June 30, 2020
Study Start
June 11, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 25, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07