Noninvasive Technique and High Flow Nasal Oxygen in Respiratory Failure
Different Modalities of Combined Noninvasive Ventilation With High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Noninvasive Ventilation Alone in Acute Respiratory Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee approval of Faculty of Medicine, Minia University and written informed consent from patients or first- degree relatives, this prospective randomized non-blind comparative study will be conducted in adult intensive care unit (ICU) of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain management department Minia university hospital over a period from September 2025 to April 2026. This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of two protocols of sequential use of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) versus NIV alone in patients with Acute Respiratory failure (ARF) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The study will include 75 patients of both sexes, classified as ASA class Ⅰ-ⅠⅠⅠ, divided into three groups with 25 patients in each group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedApril 9, 2026
April 1, 2026
10 months
November 26, 2025
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The changes in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure expressed in mmHg and the fraction of inspired oxygen expressed as a decimal)
The primary endpoint is the changes in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure expressed in mmHg and the fraction of inspired oxygen expressed as a decimal) from baseline to 24 hours.
From baseline and thoughout the first 24 hours of the start of the technique
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Changes in the arterial blood gases values: PH level, PaCO₂
From baseline to 6th hour, 12th hour, 18th hour and 24th hour of the first day of the start of the technique.
Respiratory rate
At the baseline then at 6th hour, 12th hour, 18th hour and 24th hour of the first day of the start of the technique.
Changes in the dyspnea score
From baseline to 6th hour, 12th hour, 18th hour and 24th hour of the first day of the start of the technique.
Patient-reported comfort scores
From baseline to 6th hour, 12th hour, 18th hour and 24th hour of the first day of the start of the technique.
Rate of endotracheal intubation within first 24 hours or continuation on respiratory support after 24 hours.
During the first 24 hours of the start of the technique
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
HFNC and NIV 2:1
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive first HFNC for 2 hours alternating with NIV for 1 hour. This alternating cycle of HFNC and NIV will be repeated for a total of 16 hours of HFNC and 8 hours of NIV for the first 24 hours
HFNC and NIV 3:3
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive first HFNC for 3 hours alternating with NIV for 3 hours. This alternating cycle of HFNC and NIV will be repeated for a total of 12 hours of HFNC and 12 hours of NIV for the first 24 hours
NIV only
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive conventional oxygen therapy and NIV as required for acute respiratory failure
Interventions
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a valuable alternative for delivering oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure. It delivers heated and humidified oxygen at high flow rates-up to 60 L/min-through nasal prongs, allowing for better matching of inspiratory flow, a degree of positive airway pressure, and washout of nasopharyngeal dead space. These features contribute to improved oxygenation and reduced respiratory rate. Additionally, HFNC offers superior comfort and ease of communication compared to traditional masks, which may enhance patient compliance. Importantly, recent evidence suggests that HFNC can also assist in mild hypercapnic conditions by reducing the work of breathing and improving CO₂ clearance in selected patients
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) delivers positive airway pressure either continuously or in a bilevel mode to support ventilation and oxygenation. It has been widely used in managing conditions such as COPD exacerbations, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and moderate forms of ARDS. NIV enhances alveolar ventilation, unloads respiratory muscles, and improves gas exchange while reducing the need for intubation in many cases. However, its effectiveness depends on proper patient selection and interface tolerance, and it may be less beneficial in patients with excessive secretions, altered mental status, or hemodynamic instability
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 year of both sexes. • Diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) defined as the combination of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 300 after 15 minutes of conventional oxygen delivered through a face mask, with a FiO2 at least of 50% and respiratory rate \> 30 breaths/min.
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic respiratory disease
- Cardiogenic pulmonary edema
- Life-threatening arrythmias
- Hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors
- Facial abnormalities preventing NIV or HFNC application
- Glasgow coma score of ≤ 12 points (Teasdale et al. 1974)
- Agitated patients characterized by RASS score (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) ≥ +2
- Patients who needed immediate endotracheal intubation
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Minia Universitylead
- Minia University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Minya university hospitals
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Omyma S Mohamed, Prof.
ahmed_ezz@mu.edu.eg
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2025
First Posted
April 9, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share