Glycemic Stability During the Intraoperative Period Among Patients With DM Undergoing CABG Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: Intraoperative glycemic stability and control among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remains a significant concern. In this study, the intraoperative glycemic stability among diabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery was compared between patients who received an intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control with those who received an CII for conventional glycemic control, during the intraoperative period. Research Design and Methods: This study implemented a quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 144 patients with DM undergoing CABG surgery at a major hospital in Amman, Jordan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2020
CompletedJune 30, 2020
June 1, 2020
3 months
June 25, 2020
June 25, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative glycemic instability
Intraoperative glycemic instability is defined as three consecutive readings of intraoperative blood glucose (BG) levels outside the pre-set targeted ranges of the protocols, whether higher or lower than the limits
every half hour for eight hours
Study Arms (1)
Interventional
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
This study aims to explore the hypothesis that diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery receiving intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control (110-149 mg/dl) protocol during the intraoperative period would have improved intraoperative glycemic stability, efficacy and consistency compared to patients receiving conventional glycemic control (150-180 mg/dl) protocol during the intraoperative period
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult Jordanian patients
- diagnosed with DM
- who had been scheduled to CABG surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who were immunosuppressed were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jordan royal medical service
Amman, Jordan
Related Publications (15)
Boreland L, Scott-Hudson M, Hetherington K, Frussinetty A, Slyer JT. The effectiveness of tight glycemic control on decreasing surgical site infections and readmission rates in adult patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review. Heart Lung. 2015 Sep-Oct;44(5):430-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
PMID: 26138777BACKGROUNDOgawa S, Okawa Y, Sawada K, Goto Y, Yamamoto M, Koyama Y, Baba H, Suzuki T. Continuous postoperative insulin infusion reduces deep sternal wound infection in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):420-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv106. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
PMID: 25825261BACKGROUNDde Vries FE, Gans SL, Solomkin JS, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Dellinger EP, Boermeester MA. Meta-analysis of lower perioperative blood glucose target levels for reduction of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e95-e105. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10424. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
PMID: 27901264BACKGROUNDHua J, Chen G, Li H, Fu S, Zhang LM, Scott M, Li Q. Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional insulin therapy during cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):829-34. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
PMID: 22336691BACKGROUNDWahby, Ehab A, Elnasr M. M. Abo, Michael I. Eissa, and Sahbaa M. Mahmoud.
BACKGROUNDGandhi GY, Nuttall GA, Abel MD, Mullany CJ, Schaff HV, O'Brien PC, Johnson MG, Williams AR, Cutshall SM, Mundy LM, Rizza RA, McMahon MM. Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional glucose management during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):233-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00002.
PMID: 17310047BACKGROUNDGreco G, Shi W, Michler RE, Meltzer DO, Ailawadi G, Hohmann SF, Thourani VH, Argenziano M, Alexander JH, Sankovic K, Gupta L, Blackstone EH, Acker MA, Russo MJ, Lee A, Burks SG, Gelijns AC, Bagiella E, Moskowitz AJ, Gardner TJ. Costs associated with health care-associated infections in cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 6;65(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.079.
PMID: 25572505BACKGROUNDLazar HL, Chipkin SR, Fitzgerald CA, Bao Y, Cabral H, Apstein CS. Tight glycemic control in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients improves perioperative outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events. Circulation. 2004 Mar 30;109(12):1497-502. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121747.71054.79. Epub 2004 Mar 8.
PMID: 15006999BACKGROUNDBenneyan JC. Use and interpretation of statistical quality control charts. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Feb;10(1):69-73. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.1.69. No abstract available.
PMID: 10030790BACKGROUNDCanadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee; Imran SA, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Ross S. Targets for glycemic control. Can J Diabetes. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Mar 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 24070959BACKGROUNDBhamidipati CM, LaPar DJ, Stukenborg GJ, Morrison CC, Kern JA, Kron IL, Ailawadi G. Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
PMID: 21163498BACKGROUNDFinfer, S, DR Chittock, SY Su, D Blair, D Foster, V Dhingra, R Bellomo, D Cook, P Dodek, WR Henderson, PC Hébert, S Heritier, DK Heyland, C McArthur, E McDonald, I Mitchell, JA Myburgh, R Norton, J Potter, BG Robinson, and JJ Ronco.
BACKGROUNDFurnary AP, Wu Y. Clinical effects of hyperglycemia in the cardiac surgery population: the Portland Diabetic Project. Endocr Pract. 2006 Jul-Aug;12 Suppl 3:22-6. doi: 10.4158/EP.12.S3.22.
PMID: 16905513BACKGROUNDUmpierrez G, Cardona S, Pasquel F, Jacobs S, Peng L, Unigwe M, Newton CA, Smiley-Byrd D, Vellanki P, Halkos M, Puskas JD, Guyton RA, Thourani VH. Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Versus Conservative Glucose Control in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: GLUCO-CABG Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1665-72. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0303. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
PMID: 26180108BACKGROUNDHweidi IM, Zytoon AM, Hayajneh AA, Al Obeisat SM, Hweidi AI. The effect of intraoperative glycemic control on surgical site infections among diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Heliyon. 2021 Dec 2;7(12):e08529. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08529. eCollection 2021 Dec.
PMID: 34926859DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2020
First Posted
June 30, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2018
Study Completion
November 30, 2018
Last Updated
June 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share