Proximal Priority Versus Distal Priority Robotic Priming Effects in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Effects of Proximal Priority Versus Distal Priority Robotic Priming Technique With Rehabilitation Therapy of Upper-Limb Functions in Patients With Chronic Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This is a single-blind randomized comparative efficacy study involving 54-72 participants with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomized into proximal priority robotic group or distal priority robotic group and receive 18 intervention sessions (90 min/d, 3 d/wk for 6 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale, Medical Research Council Scale, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, and Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered at baseline, after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Method will be used to examine the comparative efficacy and predictors of outcome, respectively, after intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
February 25, 2026
February 1, 2026
6 years
June 18, 2020
February 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment is used to assess motor impairment of body function, including ranges of motion of the upper extremity (UE) joints, and grasping, coordination, and speed of UE. movement.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment will be administered to participants at baseline.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment is used to assess motor impairment of body function, including ranges of motion of the UE joints, and grasping, coordination, and speed of UE movement.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment will be administered to participants at immediately after intervention.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment is used to assess motor impairment of body function, including ranges of motion of the UE joints, and grasping, coordination, and speed of UE. movement.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment will be administered to participants at three months after intervention.
Medical Research Council Scale
Medical Research Council Scale is used to assess muscle power of the affected upper extremity joints.
Medical Research Council Scale will be administered to participants at baseline.
Medical Research Council Scale
Medical Research Council Scale is used to assess muscle power of the affected upper extremity joints.
Medical Research Council Scale will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.
Medical Research Council Scale
Medical Research Council Scale is used to assess muscle power of the affected upper extremity joints.
Medical Research Council Scale will be administered to participants three months after intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (17)
The ABILHAND Questionnaire
The ABILHAND Questionnaire will be administered to participants at baseline.
The ABILHAND Questionnaire
The ABILHAND Questionnaire will be administered to participants immediately after intervention..
The ABILHAND Questionnaire
The ABILHAND Questionnaire will be administered to participants three months after intervention..
The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0
The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 will be administered to participants at baseline.
The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0
The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PRI group
EXPERIMENTALThe PRI and DRI groups will receive an equal amount of treatment time, comprising 1.5 hours per day, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. The PRI protocol provides robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist).
DRI group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe PRI and DRI groups will receive an equal amount of treatment time, comprising 1.5 hours per day, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. The DRI protocol provides robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).
Interventions
The PRI and DRI protocol provide robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist). The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).In every session of robotic training, the patient will practice bilateral passive range of motion exercise, in which affected upper extremity is assisted by the unaffected side, and bilateral active range of motion exercise. Robotic training will be followed by impairment-oriented training.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Fongyuan Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital
Taipei, 116, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Lee YC, Li YC, Lin KC, Chen CL, Wu YH, Kuo C, Yeh YP, Liu TX. Effects of proximal priority and distal priority robotic priming techniques with impairment-oriented training of upper limb functions in patients with chronic stroke: study protocol for a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05561-6.
PMID: 34496938DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keh-chung Lin, ScD
National Taiwan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Initial and outcome assessments will be administered by a well-trained and certified occupational therapist who is blinded to the group assignment, study hypotheses, and intervention of the patients.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2020
First Posted
June 24, 2020
Study Start
July 3, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share