NCT04444934

Brief Summary

Complete disease removal has the greatest impact in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, both during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS), but, contrarily to PDS, no consensus exist on the interpretation of the absence of residual tumor at IDS. In addition, chemotherapy induces fibrotic changes that can hinder the surgeon's ability to properly assess the spread of abdominal disease. The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of visual inspection compared to histopathological examination at the level of the diaphragmatic peritoneum in patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
155

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2016

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 21, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 17, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ovarian cancerinterval debulking surgeryvisual examination

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy

    to evaluate the accuracy of the visual examination compared to histopathological examination, at the level of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum, in patients subjected to IDS

    During surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative complications

    up to 30 days after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Patients with not-surely pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum

The definition of not-surely pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum was given in association with the presence of flat dyschromic areas.

Other: histological examination

Patients with certainly pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum

The definition of certainly pathological diaphragmatic peritoneum was given when isolated or confluent thick nodules were visualized at the intra-operative inspection.

Other: histological examination

Interventions

Patients were classified in two groups based on the surgeon's visual examination of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum. The accuracy of visual examination has been assessed comparing surgeon's opinions to histological examination

Patients with certainly pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneumPatients with not-surely pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with histology proven biopsy of epithelial ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer (FIGO stage III C - IV B), judged suitable for IDS by clinicians, with evidence of suspected or certain residual disease at the level of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum, at intraoperative evaluation.

You may qualify if:

  • patients with histology proven biopsy of epithelial ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer (FIGO stage III C - IV B), judged suitable for IDS by clinicians, with evidence of suspected or certain residual disease at the level of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum, at intraoperative evaluation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with no evidence of diaphragmatic disease during IDS, and who therefore did not undergo diaphragmatic peritonectomy or biopsy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Rome, RM, 00168, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsGenital DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal Disorders

Study Officials

  • Barbara Costantini, MD

    Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2020

First Posted

June 24, 2020

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

July 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations