Intra-operative Visual Examination at IDS
VIPER
Can Intraoperative Visual Examination of Diaphragmatic Peritoneum be a Reliable Tool to Modulate the Extent of Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer? The VIPER (VIsual Peritoneal Evaluation of Residual Disease) Study
1 other identifier
observational
155
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Complete disease removal has the greatest impact in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, both during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS), but, contrarily to PDS, no consensus exist on the interpretation of the absence of residual tumor at IDS. In addition, chemotherapy induces fibrotic changes that can hinder the surgeon's ability to properly assess the spread of abdominal disease. The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of visual inspection compared to histopathological examination at the level of the diaphragmatic peritoneum in patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2016
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedJuly 17, 2020
July 1, 2020
3 years
June 21, 2020
July 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy
to evaluate the accuracy of the visual examination compared to histopathological examination, at the level of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum, in patients subjected to IDS
During surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative complications
up to 30 days after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Patients with not-surely pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum
The definition of not-surely pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum was given in association with the presence of flat dyschromic areas.
Patients with certainly pathologic diaphragmatic peritoneum
The definition of certainly pathological diaphragmatic peritoneum was given when isolated or confluent thick nodules were visualized at the intra-operative inspection.
Interventions
Patients were classified in two groups based on the surgeon's visual examination of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum. The accuracy of visual examination has been assessed comparing surgeon's opinions to histological examination
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with histology proven biopsy of epithelial ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer (FIGO stage III C - IV B), judged suitable for IDS by clinicians, with evidence of suspected or certain residual disease at the level of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum, at intraoperative evaluation.
You may qualify if:
- patients with histology proven biopsy of epithelial ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer (FIGO stage III C - IV B), judged suitable for IDS by clinicians, with evidence of suspected or certain residual disease at the level of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum, at intraoperative evaluation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with no evidence of diaphragmatic disease during IDS, and who therefore did not undergo diaphragmatic peritonectomy or biopsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
Rome, RM, 00168, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barbara Costantini, MD
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2020
First Posted
June 24, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07