NCT05682027

Brief Summary

The diaphragm is the main muscle for inspiration and vital for ventilation. Multiple diagnostic modalities can be performed in the work-up of suspected diaphragm dysfunction. Fluoroscopy has traditionally been the method of choice in diagnosing diaphragm paralysis and is still widely used in clinical practice, while alternative non-invasive and accessible methods have been available. Superiority of ultrasound over fluoroscopy for the diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction has been suggested. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the construct validity of ultrasound in diaphragm paralysis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 27, 2022

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 12, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 5, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 21, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 21, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

December 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

diaphragm dysfunctionultrasoundfluoroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Concordance of diaphragm paralysis as determined by ultrasound compared with the construct for diaphragm paralysis based on traditional measurements

    Parameters: * Paralysis (ultrasound): Qualitative (visual): Paradoxal movement OR Quantitative: Diaphragm Excursion(DE) \< 0cm (negative). * Paralysis (reference): (Physical examination suggestive of diaphragm dysfunction (i.e. paradoxal abdominal movement) OR Decrease in vital capacity of \>15% when suspine) AND Paradoxal movement during fluoroscopy.

    From referall till completion of diagnostic tests.

Study Arms (1)

Patients suspected of diaphragm dysfunction

After inclusion, participants will be evaluated for diaphragm dysfunction with fluoroscopy, as in standard of care. Additionally, during the same hospital visit ultrasound will be performed. The sonographer and the radiologist assessing the ultrasound and fluoroscopy, respectively, will be blinded to each other's' test results. Further assessment, and possible treatment, for diaphragm dysfunction is performed at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary outcome is the concordance of diaphragm paralysis as determined by ultrasound compared with the construct for diaphragm paralysis based on traditional measurements.

Diagnostic Test: ultrasound of the diaphragm

Interventions

Parameters measured during ultrasound: Thickening fraction; End-expiratory thickness, and; Diaphragm excursion.

Patients suspected of diaphragm dysfunction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Our population consists of 18-years or older patients suspected of diaphragm dysfunction based on medical history and/or physical examination; as determined by the treating physician.

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • Suspicion of diaphragm dysfunction based on medical history and/or physical examination; as determined by the treating physician.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability for fluoroscopy (e.g. severely limited mobility, or unable to follow vocal instructions).
  • Inability for diaphragm imaging (e.g. mechanical ventilation, or unable to follow vocal instructions).
  • Those not able or unwilling to give written informed consent.
  • Pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Isala Klinieken

Zwolle, Overijssel, 8025AB, Netherlands

Location

UCMG

Groningen, 9700RB, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • de Boer WS, Parlevliet KL, Kooistra LA, Koster D, Nieuwenhuis JA, Edens MA, van den Berg JWK, Boomsma MF, Stigt JA, Slebos DJ, Duiverman ML. Ultrasound as diagnostic tool in diaphragm dysfunction: a prospective construct validity study. Respir Med. 2025 May;241:108083. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108083. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

Study Officials

  • wytze de Boer, M.D.

    Isala

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2022

First Posted

January 12, 2023

Study Start

September 5, 2023

Primary Completion

March 21, 2024

Study Completion

March 21, 2024

Last Updated

June 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Locations