Investigation of the Effects of Balance Training on Balance and Functional Status Patients With Total Hip Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of balance training in patients with THA until 26 weeks postoperatively. Thirty-two patients with hip osteoarthritis who were candidates for THA were recruited to the study. Sixteen patients with THA completed the study protocol and the patients were randomized into 2 groups: conventional rehabilitation (CR, n=8) or conventional rehabilitation plus balance training (CR + BT, n=8) groups. The patients were evaluated by hand-held dynamometer, single leg stance test (SLST), Tetrax balance system, Harris hip score, lower extremity function scale, 5 times sit-to-stand test and 50 foot timed walk test preoperatively and in the 8th, 14th and 26th weeks postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedJune 16, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.1 years
June 10, 2020
June 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
single leg test
Patients were tested first with eyes opened and then with eyes closed; they were asked to stand on either their left or right leg and tried to keep their legs from touching and to maintain single-leg stance for as long as possible. The test and time began once the foot was lifted off the floor, and ended when placing the lifted foot on the floor or with arm movements. The test was terminated following a maximum of 45 s, and each leg was tested three times with eyes opened and eyes closed and the best of the three trials were recorded
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Tetrax Balance Assessment
Tetrax Balance Assessment System (Sunlight Medical Ltd.Ramat Gan, Israel); is a valid, reliable and objective method to evaluate balance and fall risk. The system obtains data by using 4 different platforms which measure vertical pressure fluctuations arising from two heels and two fingertips. Patients were instructed an immobile posture for 32 s for each of the eight sensory conditions.The fall risks of the patients were calculated as percentage (%) by a posturographic program considering the oscillation rates. A value between 0% and 36% is judged as mild risk; a value between 37% and 58%, as moderate risk; and between 59% and 100%, as high risk. The higher score is showed the greater falling risk
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Sit to stand test
STS; is an objective functional measure of strength correlating with ambulatory independence. Sit-to-stand (such as the 5 STS) activities are recommended as the minimal core set of performance-based outcome measures in OA research and clinical practice \[21\]. Patients sit on a height adjustable chair such that a 90⁰ angle is formed when the femur is horizontal and tibia vertical with their feet shoulder width apart and their arms crossed against their chest. Patients are timed as they 5 times stand up from chair and sit down again without using their hand, time was recorded as second
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
50 feet walk test
50 FWT; is a reliable measurement method and commonly used in studies of exercise based OA. All patients are asked to walk as quickly as possible in 50 feet length distance. The physiotherapist counted number of steps and as soon as the patient finished to walking 50 feet length distance and the time was recorded as seconds
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Harris hip score
Many different hip scoring scales are used in assessment of THA's results \[23\]. HHS is a joint specific outcome measurements and the most frequently used in assessment of THA patients. It has been used in a number of studies over the years and has been shown to have high validity and reliability \[23,24\]. HHS was recorded, a score commonly used in this context, which contains questions about pain, function, absence of deformity, and range-of-motion. The best possible score is 100 points
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Lower extremity function scale
is a region specific measure, was conceived to assess the lower extremity functional status of patients and the reliability estimates have been high when investigated in the THA and TKA population. The LEFS is composed of 20 items each scored on a 5 point adjectival scale with '0' extreme difficulty or unable to perform the activity and '4' no difficulty. The items are summed to produce a total LEFS score, which can vary from 0 to 80.
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain assessment
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Range of motion
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Muscle strength
Pre-op to post-op 26. week
Study Arms (2)
conventional rehabilitation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe conventional rehabilitation group completed hip joint range of motion and muscle strengthening exercises
conventional rehabilitation + balance training group
EXPERIMENTALThe conventional rehabilitation + balance training group completed hip joint range of motion and muscle strengthening exercises and 12 balance exercises.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Total hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis
- First time hip surgery/prothesis
- no involvement in any exercise program in the past 12 months
You may not qualify if:
- THA due to hip fracture,
- revision hip prothesis,
- arthritis in other joints limited function
- neurologic problems that limited function and balance,
- body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Dokuz Eylul University
Izmir, Bornova, 35340, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nuray Elibol, PhD
Ege University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant of Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2020
First Posted
June 16, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 20, 2015
Study Completion
December 25, 2016
Last Updated
June 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share