Study Stopped
The study initially aimed to measure droplets; however, as more was learned about COVID transmission, it became apparent that aerosol should be measured, but the method to measure aerosol was not possible for this study, so the study was withdrawn.
Dental Isolation Methods in Pediatric Patients
Evaluation of Impact on Environmental Spatter Using Different Isolation Methods During Hygiene Appointment Among Pediatric Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to collect, measure, and assess the environmental spatter produced during dental appointments under different isolation methods used in pediatric dentistry, to compare the effectiveness of aerosol reduction between these methods, to identify the most effective way to manage aerosol during dental prophylaxis for pediatric patients and to provide clinical evidence to facilitate practice guidelines in dentistry related to COVID-19.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Nov 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 29, 2021
October 1, 2021
1 year
June 10, 2020
October 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To collect, measure, and assess the environmental spatter produced during dental appointments under different isolation methods used in pediatric dentistry
The image of the spots of fluorescence from the spatter collected will be captured using a digital camera (Nikon D3100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with an amber-colored lens cover. The image will be processed by a digital imaging software, ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin) to get the number of the spots on each mask and film. The number of fluorescent spots is recorded to determine the amount of spatter produced.
Through case completion, an average a year
Study Arms (3)
Group 1- The saliva ejector
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2- The high-volume evacuator
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 3- The DryShield
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
A thin suction tube that draws water, saliva, blood, and debris from the mouth to provide patient comfort, preventing patient from constantly having to sit up and spit while maintain a clear operative field. It is connected through the low-volume suction hose in the dental chair. It can be held by the dental assistant, the dental provider or by the patient. In practice, it can be also contoured and hang by the cheek of the patient due to its light weight.
The high-velocity air evacuation device. It is connected through the high-volume suction hose in the dental chair. It is operated by a dental assistant during the dental treatment, owing to the challenge posed by the rigid disposable attachment and bulky high-volume suction hose.
The device is attached to the high-volume suction hose to provide continuous suction of intraoral fluid and debris, and also simultaneous isolation to both maxillary and mandibular quadrants on the same side. Other advantages of these devices include retracting the tongue and cheek, and prevention of aspiration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1 patients
- Receiving dental prophylaxis or restorative procedure not requiring sedation or nitrous oxide
- Ability to cooperate in the dental chair
- Parents speak/read either English or Spanish and consent to study
- Child, when age appropriate, can assent to study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that do not meet the above criteria (including inability to cooperate or special health care need)
- Parents that do not speak/read either English or Spanish
- Children that do not assent (when age appropriate) to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Kumbargere Nagraj S, Eachempati P, Paisi M, Nasser M, Sivaramakrishnan G, Verbeek JH. Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):CD013686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013686.pub2.
PMID: 33047816DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Di I Wu, DDS,MS,PhD
UTHealth Science Center at Houston
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The assessor will be blind to group assignment of the patients
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2020
First Posted
June 12, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Not sharing