Gaze Training on Task Performance Regional Anaesthesia
The Effect of Gaze Training on Task Performance and Skill Acquisition in Ultrasound-guided Regional Anaesthesia: a Partially Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
43
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Regional anaesthesia is the performance of spinal, epidural or peripheral nerve blocks to allow patients to undergo surgery awake and to provide post-operative pain relief. Anaesthetists inject local anaesthetic using specialist needles close to nerves to prevent transmission of pain. Hand-held ultrasound is often used by anaesthetists to direct these needles to the correct position i.e. close to, but not in the nerve itself. If the needle is not adequately seen using the hand-held ultrasound it may pierce the nerve causing permanent nerve damage and significant patient harm. Within the time and resource constraints of postgraduate medical training, it would be advantageous to optimise expertise acquisition of practical skills with a cheap, self-directed educational intervention. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine whether gaze training is associated with improved performance of an ultrasound-guided needle task. The investigators hypothesise that improved gaze control will translate to better technical performance of an ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia task.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
June 1, 2020
4 months
June 2, 2020
June 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Composite Error Score
Objective error scoring of performance at needling task
Undertaken during ultrasound assessment 1 (before training intervention) and during ultrasound assessment 2 (which will occur 10 minutes after the training intervention was undertaken). Each assessment will be 15 minutes in duration.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Global Rating Scale
Undertaken during ultrasound assessment 1 (before training intervention) and during ultrasound assessment 2 (which will occur 10 minutes after the training intervention). Each assessment will be 15 minutes in duration.
Other Outcomes (2)
Change in Task completion time
Undertaken during ultrasound assessment 1 (before training intervention) and during ultrasound assessment 2 (which will occur 10 minutes after the training intervention was undertaken). Each assessment will be 15 minutes in duration.
Change in Fixation durations
Undertaken during ultrasound assessment 1 (before training intervention) and during ultrasound assessment 2 (which will occur 10 minutes after the training intervention was undertaken). Each assessment will be 15 minutes in duration.
Study Arms (2)
Group Gaze
EXPERIMENTALThe gaze-trained group will be shown a video, derived from the eye tracker, of an expert's visual control whilst performing the ultrasound task. Participants will be made aware of the target-focused gaze strategy (lengthy and stable fixations on the needling target), and the manner in which the gaze shifted from target to tools (hands, needle and transducer) in a fast, smooth fashion. They will then be advised to try to mimic the gaze strategy of the expert while undertaking the needling task as their first training task. After completion of this training task, participants will be shown their own video data, as captured by the eye tracker. Participants will be asked to comment on differences between their own video and the expert video they had previously seen. This feedback process will be replicated a further four training task attempts. Participants in this group will therefore undergo a total of five training attempts of the needling task.
Group Discovery
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe discovery learning group will be given no video feedback and will be instructed to perform five training attempts at the needling task without further training or feedback.
Interventions
A phase of discovery learning guided by novice operators themselves
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering or Maths (STEM) students who are capable of giving informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous experience of gaze training or eye tracking software
- Previous experience of regional anaesthesia needling tasks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David W Hewson, MBBS
University of Nottingham
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Honorary Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2020
First Posted
June 11, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share