Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

NCT04422938 | Completed FDA Device

• 1 other identifier: medybu-IN
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 303
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest; Resuscitation

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Chest compression; In-hospital; Mechanical; Manuel

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Mortality rate on the 30th day

  Mortality rates from the hospital admission to the 30th day

  30 days

• Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation

  Rate of return of the spontaneous circulation with duration at least five minutes

  5 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Manuel compression

Manuel chest compressions will be handled by clinicians

Other: Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians

Mechanical compression

Mechanical chest compressions will be handled via mechanical chest compression device

Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

Interventions

Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians OTHER

Compressions will be handled by human efforts

Manuel compression

LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System DEVICE

LUCAS-2 model piston-based mechanical chest compression device was used for mechanical chest compressions

Mechanical compression

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cases with cardiac arrest in-hospital environment (in emergency department) and whose had manual or mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency department included in the study; data were collected hospital management information system and analyzed retropectively.

You may qualify if:

• Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department

You may not qualify if:

• \<18 age

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Ankara City Hospital Bilkent: lead
• Ankara Training and Research Hospital: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine

Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

• Couper K, Yeung J, Nicholson T, Quinn T, Lall R, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression devices at in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun;103:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

  PMID: 26976675 BACKGROUND

• Couper K, Quinn T, Lall R, Devrell A, Orriss B, Seers K, Yeung J, Perkins GD; COMPRESS-RCT collaborators. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 30;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6.

  PMID: 30165909 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Arrest

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 5, 2020
• First Posted: June 9, 2020
• Study Start: January 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: December 31, 2017
• Study Completion: March 31, 2018
• Last Updated: June 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)