NCT00449969

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an online automatic feedback improved CPR quality (No-flow time, compression depth, short-term survival and one year follow up) in this prospective randomised study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
312

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 21, 2007

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2007

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2009

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2011

Status Verified

April 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2007

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2011

Conditions

Cardiac ArrestResuscitation

Keywords

AED (automated external defibrillation)feedbackout of hospital resuscitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • ratio of patients with spontaneous circulation

    admission to the hospital

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • length of hospital stay

    hospital discharge

  • neurological status

    hospital discharge

  • neurological status

    one year after resuscitation

Study Arms (2)

1. Extended feedback

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Zoll AED pro

2. Limited feedback

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Zoll AED pro

Interventions

Zoll AED proDEVICE

Arm one (Extended feedback) offers full feedback guidance during CPR

1. Extended feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • cardiac arrest

You may not qualify if:

  • age under 18 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Muenster

Münster, D-48149, Germany

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Lukas RP, Sengelhoff C, Dopker S, Harding U, Mertens P, Osada N, Van Aken H, Weber TP, Bohn A. [Chest compression quality : Can feedback technology help?]. Anaesthesist. 2010 Feb;59(2):135-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1671-4. German.

    PMID: 20151103RESULT

  • Bohn A, Weber TP, Wecker S, Harding U, Osada N, Van Aken H, Lukas RP. The addition of voice prompts to audiovisual feedback and debriefing does not modify CPR quality or outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest--a prospective, randomized trial. Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

    PMID: 21146279RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Arrest

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Thomas P Weber, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Muenster

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2007

First Posted

March 21, 2007

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion

April 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2010

Last Updated

April 22, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-04

Locations

DE(1)