Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression

NCT04069377 | Completed FDA Device

• 1 other identifier: medybu154
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 214
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Chest compression; Manuel; Mechanical

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Rate of the mortality on the 30th day

  Mortality from the admission to the 30th day

  30 days

• Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation

  Return of spontaneous circulation at least 5 minutes

  5 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Manuel chest compression

Manuel chest compressions will be handled by human efforts.

Other: Manuel chest compressions by human efforts

Mechanical chest compression

In the study, chest compression in the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was performed with the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Chest Compression System (LUCAS 2).

Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

Interventions

LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System DEVICE

LUCAS is a portable device designed to rule out the problems encountered during manual chest compression, capable of performing standard and continuous chest compressions at a depth of 4-5 cm and at least 100 times per minute.

Mechanical chest compression

Manuel chest compressions by human efforts OTHER

In this way chest compressions will be handled by humans themselves.

Manuel chest compression

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The data of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department were analyzed retrospectively.

You may qualify if:

• Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases Out-of-hospital arrest

You may not qualify if:

• \<18 age

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Ankara City Hospital Bilkent: lead
• Ankara Training and Research Hospital: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine

Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

• Brodal Syversen K, Souvannasacd E, Renger R. Validating the LUCAS(R) mechanical chest compression fit specifications. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):371-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.069. Epub 2018 Jun 30. No abstract available.

  PMID: 30686332 BACKGROUND

• Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DV, Verheugt FW, Smeets JL, de Boer MJ. Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;67(3):349-360.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

  PMID: 26607332 BACKGROUND

• Gates S, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Blair L, Couper K, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 Sep;94:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

  PMID: 26190673 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Arrest

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 23, 2019
• First Posted: August 28, 2019
• Study Start: January 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: January 15, 2018
• Study Completion: April 15, 2018
• Last Updated: August 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)