NCT04420026

Brief Summary

The automatic fusion of the ultrasound with a cone-beam CT volume will guide the positioning of the electrodes, despite the visibility of the tumor in ultrasound, in patients treated with irreversible electroporation in the interventional radiology room at Avicenna Hospital for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The objective is to evaluate the primary success rate of the automatic cone-beam CT fusion procedure and ultrasound, regardless of the tumor's visibility status in ultrasound.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 4, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2020

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 6, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 29, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 29, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

May 4, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 3, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

ablationcone-beam CT volumeultrasonography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of the primary success rate of percutaneous ablation treatment with IRE of hepatic tumors, as a function of the ultrasound visibility of the tumor, when using automatic CT cone-beam fusion and ultrasound

    Primary success is assessed on the control MRI or CT performed one month after the first IRE (Irreversible Electroporation) ablation procedure targeting a given tumor. It is defined by the absence of visible recurrence at 1 month on post-operative imaging. In the case of a partial response, a % of active tumor will be evaluated.

    At 1 month on post-operative imaging

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Evaluate the time savings when using "INTERACT Active Tracker" allowing automatic alignment of the CBCT volume with ultrasound

    The day of the operation

  • Evaluate the time saved by using "INTERACT Active Tracker" allowing automatic alignment of the CBCT volume with ultrasound compared to the manual alignment procedure performed on a series of patients treated when the new function was not available.

    The day of the operation

  • Evaluate the confidence gain associated with the use of ultrasound fusion.

    The day of the operation

  • Evaluate the accuracy of the automatic alignment judged on the ultrasound measurement of the distance from the center of the target seen in ultrasound to that segmented on the pre-therapeutic pour Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

    The day of the operation

  • Evaluate the percentage of procedures for which similarity points must be added due to an initial delay in automatic merging that the operator considers too long.

    The day of the operation

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Experimental Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Hepatocellular tumours

Radiation: Interact Active Tracker

Interventions

Interact Active Tracker, allowing the automation of the fusion between a CBCT and ultrasound imaging

Experimental Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>18 years
  • Patient treated at Avicenna Hospital for HCC by irreversible electroporation (IRE)
  • Patient whose tumor treatment requires the use of fusion tools with CBCT imaging at the beginning of the procedure
  • Patients with a scheduled follow-up examination 1 month after the ablation procedure by irreversible electroporation (IRE)
  • Patient who has understood the information and agreed to participate in this research by signing the consent form
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system or entitled person

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of allergy to iodinated contrast material
  • Patients with MRI contraindications
  • Patients with a history of allergy to contrast material containing gadolinium
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients under the protection of justice
  • Patients unable to understand research information in an informed manner
  • Participation in another interventional therapeutic trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SERROR

Bobigny, 93000, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Nault JC, Sutter O, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Seror O. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):783-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

    PMID: 29031662BACKGROUND
  • Yu H, Burke CT. Comparison of percutaneous ablation technologies in the treatment of malignant liver tumors. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014 Jun;31(2):129-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1373788.

    PMID: 25071303BACKGROUND
  • Monfardini L, Orsi F, Caserta R, Sallemi C, Della Vigna P, Bonomo G, Varano G, Solbiati L, Mauri G. Ultrasound and cone beam CT fusion for liver ablation: technical note. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):500-504. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1509237. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

    PMID: 30204007BACKGROUND
  • Lee LH, Hwang JI, Cheng YC, Wu CY, Lee SW, Yang SS, Yeh HZ, Chang CS, Lee TY. Comparable Outcomes of Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography in the Guidance of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169655. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28068369BACKGROUND
  • Cornelis FH, Korenbaum C, Ben Ammar M, Tavolaro S, Nouri-Neuville M, Lotz JP. Multimodal image-guided electrochemotherapy of unresectable liver metastasis from renal cell cancer. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 May;100(5):309-311. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 26. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30691970BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Study Officials

  • Olivier Mr SEROR, PhD

    Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux Paris

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2020

First Posted

June 9, 2020

Study Start

July 6, 2020

Primary Completion

July 29, 2022

Study Completion

July 29, 2022

Last Updated

October 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Locations