Non Invasive Ventilation With NAVA vs ASV for AECOPD
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-invasive Ventilation With Adaptive Support Ventilation Versus Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Non invasive ventilation is the standard of care in managing patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However no optimal mode of NIV delivery is established; failure rates remain high, attributed to asynchrony and leak associated with NIV. Neurally adjust ventilator assist is a new mode that may improve patient ventilator interactions, improve synchrony and contribute to improved outcomes. Likewise ASV is a mode principled on the closed loop system and is associated with reduction of work associated with breathing and improved outcomes. In this randomised, non-blinded trial, we study these two modes of NIV delivery in patients of AECOPD with hypothesis being that better synchrony with NAVA may translate to better clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedAugust 9, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.1 years
May 29, 2020
August 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of NIV failure
NIV failure will be considered in case of • Endotracheal intubation
From initiation of NIV to either intubation or re-initiation of NIV or successful weaning
Secondary Outcomes (8)
28-day mortality rate
28 days
90-day mortality rate
90 days
Time to NIV failure
28 days
Time to successful weaning
28 days
Physician's ease of use of the mode on visual analogue scale
Assessed every 8 hours until primary outcome
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NAVA arm
EXPERIMENTALDelivery of NIV-NAVA NIV NAVA will be administered using Servo-i ventilator (Maquet, Getinge Group, Sweden) with software to compensate for air leaks. Subjects randomised to this arm will undergo placement of Edi catheter and will be initiated on NIV. Appropriate NAVA level will be selected based on the scalars corresponding to stable ventilation in pressure support mode. During NAVA, the NAVA level would be increased in multiples of 0.2 cm H2O/µV to attain favourable response (tidal volume 6-8mL/kg RR ≤25). Once the patient's clinical condition stabilises, and the Edi maximum starts declining or remains unchanged with stable tidal volumes, NAVA level will be decreased in steps of 0.2 cm H2O/μV every 2 hours. If response to new settings is not favourable earlier settings will be restored. If favourable response is attained the weaning is continued until peak pressure is \<12cm H20 and PEEP requirement is \<5cm H2O. NIV will be replaced by a venture mask to titrate SpO2 between 88-92%
ASV arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomised to the ASV arm will receive NIV using a Galileo GOLD ventilator (Hamilton Medical, AG, Switzerland). The patients will be ventilated with an initial setting of 100%-minute volume (MV%). Increments of 10% will be made every 15 minutes to achieve clinical response (relief of dyspnea, RR\<30, and tidal volume 6-8mL/kg). The expiratory trigger sensitivity will be set at 35% and adjusted accordingly. PEEP will be commenced at 3-4 cm H2O and increased by 1 cm of H2O to achieve SpO2 between 89-92% and maximum PEEP of 10 cm of H2O. Weaning would be performed by reducing the MV% gradually in decrements of 10%/hour to a MV% of 60% after the peak inspiratory pressure decreases to \<8 cm of H2O, and the respiratory rate is \< 28 breaths per minute and patient is able to maintain SpO2 \> 90% at FiO2\< 30%. Once the patient is comfortable on these settings, NIV will be replaced with oxygen supplementation using a venturi mask to maintain SpO2 between 89 and 92%.
Interventions
Non invasive ventilation will be delivered using an oro-facial interface in both arms. NIV NAVA will be administered using Servo-i ventilator (Maquet, Getinge Group, Sweden) with software to compensate for air leaks. ASV arm will receive NIV using a Galileo GOLD ventilator (Hamilton Medical, AG, Switzerland).
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any one of the following criteria will be excluded from the current study:
- Non-COPD acute hyper-capneic respiratory failure
- Hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg)
- Severe impairment of consciousness (Glasgow coma scale score \<8)
- Inability to clear respiratory secretions
- Abnormalities that preclude proper fit of the NIV interface (agitated or uncooperative patient, facial trauma or burns, facial surgery, or facial anatomical abnormality
- Subjects who have an artificial airway like tracheostomy tube or T-tube
- Contraindications for insertion of naso-/orogastric feeding tube (facial/nasal trauma, recent upper airway surgery, esophageal surgery, esophageal varices, upper gastrointestinal bleeding)
- Unwillingness to undergo placement of nasogastric catheter
- Known phrenic nerve lesions
- Suspected diaphragmatic weakness
- Patient already on home NIV therapy for chronic respiratory failure
- Failure to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, PGIMER
Chandigarh, 160012, India
Related Publications (6)
Sehgal IS, Kalpakam H, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Prasad KT, Agarwal R. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Noninvasive Ventilation with Pressure Support Ventilation and Adaptive Support Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD: A Feasibility Study. COPD. 2019 Apr;16(2):168-173. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1620716. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
PMID: 31161812BACKGROUNDChen C, Wen T, Liao W. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation in patient-ventilator interaction and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug;7(16):382. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.60.
PMID: 31555696BACKGROUNDTajamul S, Hadda V, Madan K, Tiwari P, Mittal S, Khan MA, Mohan A, Guleria R. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation in COPD Exacerbation: The NAVA-NICE Trial. Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):53-61. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07122. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
PMID: 31641071BACKGROUNDSehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Behera D, Agarwal R. Asynchrony index in pressure support ventilation (PSV) versus neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1813-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4508-z. Epub 2016 Aug 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 27562243BACKGROUNDWang DQ, Luo J, Xiong XH, Zhu LH, Zhang WW. [Effect of non-invasive NAVA on the patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 15;96(42):3375-3378. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.42.004. Chinese.
PMID: 27866528BACKGROUNDChhabria BA, Prasad KT, Dhooria S, Muthu V, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R, Gandra RR, Sehgal IS. A randomized controlled trial comparing non-invasive ventilation delivered using neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) or adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Crit Care. 2023 Jun;75:154250. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154250. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
PMID: 36680884DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, MD DM
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
August 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share