Study Stopped
Lack of enrollment post COVID-19 pandemic
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal With the Hemolung RAS for Mechanical Ventilation Avoidance During Acute Exacerbation of COPD
VENT-AVOID
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Trial to Validate the Safety and Efficacy of the Hemolung® Respiratory Assist System for COPD Patients Experiencing an Acute Exacerbation Requiring Ventilatory Support
1 other identifier
interventional
113
1 country
32
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of using the Hemolung RAS to provide low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) as an alternative or adjunct to invasive mechanical ventilation for patients who require respiratory support due to an acute exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). It is hypothesized that the Hemolung RAS can be safely used to avoid or reduce time on invasive mechanical ventilation compared to COPD patients treated with standard-of-care mechanical ventilation alone. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive lung support with either the Hemolung RAS plus standard-of-care mechanical ventilation, or standard-of-care mechanical ventilation alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
32 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 17, 2022
CompletedOctober 14, 2022
October 1, 2022
4.5 years
August 9, 2017
October 13, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The amount of time in the first five days following randomization that a patient is free of Invasive MV and alive
Statistically analyzed as Ventilator-Free Days during the 5 days from randomization (VFD-5)
5 days
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Physiologic benefit
Time to extubation from first intubation up to 60 days from randomization
Avoidance of intubation
Within 60 days from randomization
Ability to communicate by speaking
Randomization to end of treatment or 14 days, whichever is sooner
Ability to eat and drink orally
Randomization to end of treatment or 14 days, whichever is sooner
ICU Mobility
Randomization to end of treatment or 14 days, whichever is sooner
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Time to ICU discharge
From ICU admission to discharge up to 60 days from randomization
Time to hospital discharge
From hospital admission to discharge up to 60 days from randomization
Time on ventilatory support
Randomization to end of Hemolung an Invasive MV for initial exacerbation up to 60 days from randomization
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hemolung plus SOC IMV
EXPERIMENTALLow-flow ECCO2R with the Hemolung Respiratory Assist System as an alternative or adjunct to standard-of-care (SOC) invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)
SOC IMV
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard-of-care (SOC) invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone
Interventions
Treatment with a medical device called the Hemolung RAS. The Hemolung RAS includes three components: the Hemolung Controller, the Hemolung Cartridge, and the Hemolung Catheter. The intervention is use of the Hemolung RAS to provide partial lung support for acute hypercapnic lung failure by filtering carbon dioxide from venous blood using a central venous catheter through which venous blood is pumped at flows of 350-550 milliliters per minute to and from an external circuit containing a hollow fiber membrane blood gas exchanger (with heparin-coated fibers) integrated with a centrifugal pump.
Lung support for acute lung failure applied with a mechanical ventilation device that uses positive pressure to mechanically inflate the lungs and facilitate exhalation via an endotracheal tube or tracheotomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 40 years
- Confirmed diagnosis of underlying COPD or ACOS (Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome)
- Experiencing acute hypercapnic respiratory failure
- Informed consent from patient or legally authorized representative
- Meets one of the three following criteria:
- Is at high risk of requiring intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) after at least one hour on NIV due to one or more of the following:
- Respiratory acidosis (arterial pH \<= 7.25) despite NIV
- Worsening hypercapnia or respiratory acidosis relative to baseline blood gases
- No improvement in PaCO2 relative to baseline blood gases and presence of moderate or severe dyspnea
- Presence of tachypnea \> 30 breaths per minute
- Intolerance of NIV with failure to improve or worsening acidosis, dyspnea or work of breathing
- \*OR\*
- After starting NIV with a baseline arterial pH ≤ 7.25, shows signs of progressive clinical decompensation manifested by decreased mental capacity, inability to tolerate NIV, or increased or decreased respiratory rate in setting of worsened or unchanged acidosis.
- \*OR\*
- Currently intubated and receiving Invasive MV, meeting both of the following:
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- DNR/DNI order
- Hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg) despite infusion of vasoactive drugs
- Acute coronary syndrome
- Current presence of severe pulmonary edema due to Congestive Heart Failure
- PaO2/FiO2 \< 120 mmHg on PEEP \>/= 5 cmH2O
- Presence of bleeding diathesis or other contraindication to anticoagulation therapy
- Platelet count \>= 100,000/mm3 not requiring daily transfusions to maintain platelet count above 100,000/mm3 at time of screening
- Hemoglobin \>= 7.0 gm% not requiring daily transfusions to maintain hemoglobin count above 7.0 gm% at time of screening, and no active major bleeding
- Unable to protect airway (e.g. unable to generate cough or clear secretions) or significant weakness or paralysis of respiratory muscles due to causes unrelated to acute exacerbation of COPD
- Cerebrovascular accident, intracranial bleed, head injury or other neurological disorder likely to adversely affect ventilation or airway protection.
- Hypersensitivity to heparin or history of previous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT Type II)
- Presence of a significant pneumothorax or bronchopleural fistula
- Current uncontrolled, major psychiatric disorder
- Current participation in any other interventional clinical study
- Pregnant women (women of child bearing potential require a pregnancy test)
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (32)
UC Davis Medical Group
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, 19718, United States
University of Florida - Health Shands
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
WellStar Kennestone Regional Medical Center
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Lexington VA Healthcare
Lexington, Kentucky, 40502, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
LSU Health Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Spectrum Health Hospitals
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49504, United States
Minneapolis Heart
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08902, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208-3412, United States
Northwell Health
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, United States
Hospital of University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
UT Erlanger
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403, United States
Memphis VA Medical Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104, United States
UT McGovern Medical School Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Baylor Scott and White Memorial Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Inova Health Care Services
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
Related Publications (3)
Burki NK, Mani RK, Herth FJF, Schmidt W, Teschler H, Bonin F, Becker H, Randerath WJ, Stieglitz S, Hagmeyer L, Priegnitz C, Pfeifer M, Blaas SH, Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Quintel M, Moerer O. A novel extracorporeal CO(2) removal system: results of a pilot study of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):678-686. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0228.
PMID: 23460154BACKGROUNDDuggal A, Conrad SA, Barrett NA, Saad M, Cheema T, Pannu S, Romero RS, Brochard L, Nava S, Ranieri VM, May A, Brodie D, Hill NS; VENT-AVOID Investigators. Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal to Avoid Invasive Ventilation During Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: VENT-AVOID Trial - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;209(5):529-542. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2060OC.
PMID: 38261630DERIVEDStokes JW, Gannon WD, Rice TW. Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Why Should We Care? Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):e546-e547. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004844. No abstract available.
PMID: 33854019DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas Hill, MD
Tufts University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the interventional device and treatment, the study participants, care providers, and investigators will not be masked. However, an independent Clinical Endpoint Committee will be masked for adjudication of the primary endpoint and serious adverse events. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board will make study continuation recommendations based on the statistical analysis plan and the overall safety and efficacy endpoints without masking.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2017
First Posted
August 21, 2017
Study Start
February 18, 2018
Primary Completion
August 10, 2022
Study Completion
August 17, 2022
Last Updated
October 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10