NCT04405089

Brief Summary

Even when they know it can improve health, many individuals with loss of control eating struggle when they are trying to make and sustain new health habits for weight loss and maintenance of weight loss. Impulsivity, characterized by lack of foresight and planning and excessive risk taking, and compulsivity, characterized by inability to break old habitual behaviors, may play a role in refractory obesity. The primary objective of this pilot study is to investigate the effect of a novel neuroplasticity based intervention, cognitive training coupled with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on measures of impulsivity and compulsivity in individuals with obesity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 3, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 17, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 28, 2020

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 26, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 26, 2020

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

May 17, 2020

Results QC Date

April 29, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 2, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Impulsive BehaviorBehavior ControlAppetitive BehaviorHealth Risk BehaviorsCompulsive Behavior

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in NIH Examiner Flanker Task Reaction Time

    Differences in change in Flanker Task reaction time (score at final follow-up visit minus score at baseline) between active tDCS-cognitive training and sham-cognitive training groups. NIH Flanker absolute value range: 0 to 5 seconds. Higher values represent a better outcome. In the Flanker Task, a participant is instructed to press a key in response to viewing a stimulus presented on-screen. The Reaction Time, or the amount of time in seconds between presentation of the stimulus and the response, is measured.

    Change between baseline and 4 months post-stimulation (timepoint 8/final visit)

  • Change in NIH Examiner Set Shifting Task Score

    Difference in change in Set Shifting Task scores (score at final visit minus baseline score) between active tDCS-cognitive training and sham- Higher values represent a better outcome. Set Shifting Scale absolute value range: Minimum -10, Maximum 10. The Set Shifting Task Score is a combination of two subscores for reaction time and accuracy on the task.

    Change between baseline and 4 months post-stimulation (timepoint 8, final visit)

  • Change in NIH Examiner Dot Counting Task Score

    Differences in change in NIH Examiner Dot Counting Task scores (i.e., score at final visit minus baseline score) between active tDCS-cognitive training and sham-cognitive training groups. The change in score is equal to the score taken at the final follow-up visit minus the score taken at baseline. NIH Dot Counting absolute value range: numerical value -27 to +27. Higher values represent a better outcome. The Dot Count Task Score is the total sum of points awarded for dots a participant counts on the screen. The total score is a sum of scores for 27 individual trials.

    Change between baseline and 4 months post-stimulation (i.e., timepoint 8/final visit)

  • Change in NIH Examiner Unstructured Planning Task Score

    Differences in change in NIH Examiner Unstructured Planning Task scores (i.e., score at final visit minus baseline score) between active tDCS-cognitive training and sham-cognitive training groups. The change in score is equal to the score taken at the final follow-up visit minus the score taken at baseline. Higher values represent a better outcome. The Unstructured Task Score is a numeric summary score that is equal to the total sum of points awarded for completed puzzle items. The total absolute score is a sum of scores for 3 individual trials, Absolute score range :-1469 to +1469.

    Change between baseline and 4 months post-stimulation (i.e., timepoint 8, final visit)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Weight

    Change between baseline and 4 months post-intervention (i.e., timepoint 8/final visit)

  • Effect of History of Traumatic Brain Injury on Impulsive and Compulsive Eating Behavior

    Baseline visit

Study Arms (2)

Active tDCS with cognitive training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive 5 sessions of cognitive training concurrent with transcranial direct current stimulation (anode over right frontal cortex, cathode over left frontal cortex; 2 mAmps for 26 minutes).

Device: Device: Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) coupled with cognitive training

Sham tDCS with cognitive training

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants will receive 5 sessions of cognitive training concurrent with sham tDCS. For sham tDCS, electrodes are placed at the same locations as for active tDCS, but current is ramped up for the initial 30 secs, then immediately ramped back down. This method mimics the initial physical sensation of stimulation, but there is no active current for the remainder of the session.

Device: Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) coupled with cognitive training

Interventions

Cognitive training concurrent with 2 milliamperes (mAmps) of anodal stimulation applied to the right prefrontal cortex for total of 26 minutes.

Active tDCS with cognitive training

Cognitive training concurrent with sham tDCS (30 secs ramp up/ramp down of current at beginning of session).

Sham tDCS with cognitive training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Obese (BMI\>30)
  • Adults ages 18 years or older receiving care through the Minneapolis VA Healthcare System
  • Able to understand English, self-consent and follow study-related procedures
  • Willing to use a reliable form of birth control if they are of females of child-bearing potential.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of any of the following issues: seizures, severe or moderate head injury, head surgery, significant neurological disorder(significance based on Principal Investigator's judgment), frequent severe headaches
  • History of scalp conditions such as eczema or seborrheic dermatitis
  • Metal in head (other than in mouth) including shrapnel/surgical clips/welding fragments
  • Implanted medical devices (including pumps and cardiac pacemakers)
  • Pregnancy
  • Active substance abuse
  • Psychological or medical disorders requiring inpatient treatment
  • Presence of a known metabolic or hormonal disorder (such as Cushing's) which affects weight/appetite. (History of hypothyroidism is acceptable if subject is on treatment with normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) on most recent check within the last 3 months and has been on stable dosage of l-thyroxine for at least 3 months, taking it as prescribed.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Impulsive BehaviorObesityAppetitive BehaviorHealth Risk BehaviorsCompulsive Behavior

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationCognitive Training

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior, AnimalHealth Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological TechniquesNeurological RehabilitationRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Limitations and Caveats

Our study was a pilot feasibility study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Shalamar Sibley, MD, MPH
Organization
Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Shalamar Sibley, MD, MPH

    Minneapolis VAMC, University of Minnesota

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is not a disease treatment study. It involves of an Non-Significant Risk (NSR) device coupled with a set of computerized cognitive tasks in a small group of participants with primary outcome of change in an NIH Examiner domain (Flanker).
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Minnesota; Minneapolis VAMC Staff Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2020

First Posted

May 28, 2020

Study Start

May 3, 2018

Primary Completion

June 26, 2020

Study Completion

June 26, 2020

Last Updated

November 7, 2023

Results First Posted

November 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations