NCT04395690|CompletedResults
Comparing Two Anesthetic Techniques for Implant Placement
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Between Two Anesthetic Techniques for Implant Placement in the Posterior Mandible
Loading search results
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Between Two Anesthetic Techniques for Implant Placement in the Posterior Mandible
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
96
1 country
8
Study Start
January 4, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)To evaluate in a comparative way the patient's perception in implant surgery in the posterior mandibular quadrants depending on whether the operation is performed under trunk anaesthesia or infiltrative anaesthesia, in both cases with Articaine. Randomized and multicenter prospective study to be developed in eight centers with similar socio-professional characteristics, with the same operative protocol. A significant sample of patients will be randomized to undergo the same intervention (surgery to place implants in the posterior mandible) under one or another type of anesthesia (inferior alveolar block nerve or infiltrative) and data will be collected using a Numerical Rate scale on four occasions (after the incision, after drilling, after suturing and after 12h).
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 4, 2019
Actual (reported)May 12, 2020
Actual (reported)May 20, 2020
Actual (reported)July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)July 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Pain Perception by Numerical Rating Scale
Pain perception by the patient during surgical procedure, being 0 no pain at all, 1-3 mild discomfort, 4-7 moderate pain and 7-10 intense pain
Pain perceived by the patient during surgery after the incision, the osteotomy and the suture
Satisfaction of the Patient by Numerical Rating Scale
Patients satisfaction 12 hours after operation, being 0 not satisfied at all, and 10 very satisfied
Satisfaction of the patient 12 hours after surgery.
Inferior Alveolar Block Nerve (IABN) anesthesia technique before posterior mandibular implant placement.
Infiltration (INF) anesthesia technique before posterior mandibular implant placement.
Surgery done in the posterior mandible with missing teeth for placing dental implants.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Clinica Dental José Antonio Sánchez Nicolás
Cabezo de Torres, Alicante, 30110, Spain
GMD Ambrosio Bernabeu
Elche, Alicante, 03202, Spain
Salgado Dental Institute
Orihuela, Alicante, 03189, Spain
LG Dental
San Pedro del Pinatar, Murcia, 30740, Spain
Clínica Dental Esteve
Alicante, 03001, Spain
TREES Clinica Dental
Cartagena, 30203, Spain
Clínica Dental García Vega
Madrid, 28039, Spain
Kim S, Lee YJ, Lee S, Moon HS, Chung MK. Assessment of pain and anxiety following surgical placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):531-5. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2713.
Alghamdi AS. Pain sensation and postsurgical complications in posterior mandibular implant placement using ridge mapping, panoramic radiography, and infiltration anesthesia. ISRN Dent. 2013 May 21;2013:134210. doi: 10.1155/2013/134210. Print 2013.
Guillem Esteve-Pardo, DDS
Aula Dental Avanzada
96 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 12, 2020
First Posted
May 20, 2020
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Clinica Dental Amigó
Valencia, 46021, Spain
Bataineh AB, Alwarafi MA. Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2241-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1712-8. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Garcia-Blanco M, Gualtieri AF, Puia SA. A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Oct 1;10(10):e1003-e1010. doi: 10.4317/jced.54330. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Etoz OA, Er N, Demirbas AE. Is supraperiosteal infiltration anesthesia safe enough to prevent inferior alveolar nerve during posterior mandibular implant surgery? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May 1;16(3):e386-9. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e386.
Heller AA, Shankland WE 2nd. Alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia when placing mandibular dental implants posterior to the mental foramen. J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(3):127-33. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)0272.3.CO;2.
Study Start
January 4, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 30, 2024
Results First Posted
July 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
No plan to share with other researches.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: