Comparing Two Anesthetic Techniques for Implant Placement
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Between Two Anesthetic Techniques for Implant Placement in the Posterior Mandible
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
8
Brief Summary
To evaluate in a comparative way the patient's perception in implant surgery in the posterior mandibular quadrants depending on whether the operation is performed under trunk anaesthesia or infiltrative anaesthesia, in both cases with Articaine. Randomized and multicenter prospective study to be developed in eight centers with similar socio-professional characteristics, with the same operative protocol. A significant sample of patients will be randomized to undergo the same intervention (surgery to place implants in the posterior mandible) under one or another type of anesthesia (inferior alveolar block nerve or infiltrative) and data will be collected using a Numerical Rate scale on four occasions (after the incision, after drilling, after suturing and after 12h).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2024
CompletedJuly 30, 2024
July 1, 2024
2.5 years
May 12, 2020
April 16, 2022
July 28, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Perception by Numerical Rating Scale
Pain perception by the patient during surgical procedure, being 0 no pain at all, 1-3 mild discomfort, 4-7 moderate pain and 7-10 intense pain
Pain perceived by the patient during surgery after the incision, the osteotomy and the suture
Satisfaction of the Patient by Numerical Rating Scale
Patients satisfaction 12 hours after operation, being 0 not satisfied at all, and 10 very satisfied
Satisfaction of the patient 12 hours after surgery.
Study Arms (2)
Inferior Alveolar Block Nerve (IABN)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInferior Alveolar Block Nerve (IABN) anesthesia technique before posterior mandibular implant placement.
Infiltration (INF)
EXPERIMENTALInfiltration (INF) anesthesia technique before posterior mandibular implant placement.
Interventions
Surgery done in the posterior mandible with missing teeth for placing dental implants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient in health status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and ASA II
- Any age and gender
- Unitary or multiple posterior mandibular edentulism.
- Need to replace at least one implant and at least 2mm distal to mental foramen
- Absence of orofacial neurological symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication for implant surgery.
- Hypersensitivity to any of the products used in the study
- ASA patients ≦ II
- Pharmacological allergies that contraindicate the intervention
- Patients medicated with sedatives or analgesics up to 24h before the intervention
- Psychotropic drug abuse or medication that may alter painful perception 15 days before the intervention
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Interventions with conscious sedation
- Women on contraceptive treatment
- Bisphosphonate-treated patients
- Pathological mental state (dementia, psychosis)
- Severe dental anxiety
- Lack of collaboration
- Signs of infection in the area to be operated
- Unconventional surgical requirements (split crest, vertical regeneration, block graft, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Clinica Dental José Antonio Sánchez Nicolás
Cabezo de Torres, Alicante, 30110, Spain
GMD Ambrosio Bernabeu
Elche, Alicante, 03202, Spain
Salgado Dental Institute
Orihuela, Alicante, 03189, Spain
LG Dental
San Pedro del Pinatar, Murcia, 30740, Spain
Clínica Dental Esteve
Alicante, 03001, Spain
TREES Clinica Dental
Cartagena, 30203, Spain
Clínica Dental García Vega
Madrid, 28039, Spain
Clinica Dental Amigó
Valencia, 46021, Spain
Related Publications (6)
Kim S, Lee YJ, Lee S, Moon HS, Chung MK. Assessment of pain and anxiety following surgical placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):531-5. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2713.
PMID: 23527356BACKGROUNDAlghamdi AS. Pain sensation and postsurgical complications in posterior mandibular implant placement using ridge mapping, panoramic radiography, and infiltration anesthesia. ISRN Dent. 2013 May 21;2013:134210. doi: 10.1155/2013/134210. Print 2013.
PMID: 23762571BACKGROUNDBataineh AB, Alwarafi MA. Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2241-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1712-8. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PMID: 26791025BACKGROUNDGarcia-Blanco M, Gualtieri AF, Puia SA. A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Oct 1;10(10):e1003-e1010. doi: 10.4317/jced.54330. eCollection 2018 Oct.
PMID: 30386507BACKGROUNDEtoz OA, Er N, Demirbas AE. Is supraperiosteal infiltration anesthesia safe enough to prevent inferior alveolar nerve during posterior mandibular implant surgery? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May 1;16(3):e386-9. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e386.
PMID: 21196835BACKGROUNDHeller AA, Shankland WE 2nd. Alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia when placing mandibular dental implants posterior to the mental foramen. J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(3):127-33. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)0272.3.CO;2.
PMID: 12500871BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- G. Esteve-Pardo
- Organization
- Aula Dental Avanzada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillem Esteve-Pardo, DDS
Aula Dental Avanzada
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Patients were not told what type of anesthesia was being used and surgeons obtains the method of anesthesia to be used in this particular patient thirty minutes before intervention started.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2020
First Posted
May 20, 2020
Study Start
January 4, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 30, 2024
Results First Posted
July 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share with other researches.