NCT04803110

Brief Summary

The aim is to comparatively evaluate the soft tissue volume changes that occur after tooth extraction and immediate dental implant placement using two different surgical techniques. These techniques are: the Socket-Shield technique and conventional immediate placement. The null hypothesis is that the Socket-Shield technique better maintains soft tissue volume after partial tooth extraction and immediate implant placement compared to the conventional technique. From a sample of 20 patients, they will be divided into groups of 10 and will be randomized using the random.org program. The soft tissue volume will be digitally recorded by intraoral scanning before tooth extraction and 6 months later. The soft tissue dimensional changes produced will be digitally evaluated and statistically analyzed.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2021

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 25, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 13, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 16, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Postextraction implantImplant type 1Socket-ShieldSoft Tissue volumeRCT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Soft tissue volume

    Soft tissue volume changes after tooth extraction

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Surgery pain perception by Numerical Rating Scale

    Just after surgery

  • Surgery satisfaction of the patient by Numerical Rating Scale

    Just after surgery

  • General satisfaction of the patient by Numerical Rating Scale

    6 months after the beginning of treatment

  • Esthetic satisfaction of the patient by Numerical Rating Scale

    3 months after after crown placement

  • Function satisfaction of the patient by Numerical Rating Scale

    3 months after after crown placement

Study Arms (2)

Immediate Implant with SST (SST)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients who will receive immediate implant placement using the Socket-Shield Technique.

Procedure: Dental implant placement after tooth extraction

Immediate Implant with biomaterial (GAP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients who will receive immediate implant placement using bone biomaterials to fill the gap after complete extraction of the tooth.

Procedure: Dental implant placement after tooth extraction

Interventions

Immediate implant placement after partial or complete tooth extraction.

Also known as: Implant surgery
Immediate Implant with SST (SST)Immediate Implant with biomaterial (GAP)

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients requiring single tooth extraction in lateral or anterior areas of the upper jaw.
  • Teeth that do not present alteration or loss of the vestibular bone table.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients in whom surgical intervention is contraindicated.
  • Teeth with alteration or loss of the vestibular bone table.
  • Teeth with marginal recession \>2mm.
  • Early or delayed failure of the implant placed with any of the three techniques.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

ClĂ­nica Dental Esteve

Alicante, Alicante, 03001, Spain

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.

    PMID: 15691354BACKGROUND
  • Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.

    PMID: 24660198BACKGROUND
  • Lee CT, Chiu TS, Chuang SK, Tarnow D, Stoupel J. Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Sep;41(9):914-26. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12276. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

    PMID: 24894299BACKGROUND
  • Buser D, Chen ST, Weber HP, Belser UC. Early implant placement following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: biologic rationale and surgical procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Oct;28(5):441-51.

    PMID: 18990995BACKGROUND
  • Seyssens L, De Lat L, Cosyn J. Immediate implant placement with or without connective tissue graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Feb;48(2):284-301. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13397. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

    PMID: 33125754BACKGROUND
  • Hurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.

    PMID: 20712701BACKGROUND
  • Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kotsakis GA, Ganz SD, Mangano C, Iezzi G. The Root Membrane Technique: Human Histologic Evidence after Five Years of Function. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7269467. doi: 10.1155/2017/7269467. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

    PMID: 29333449BACKGROUND
  • Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hurzeler M. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12076. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

    PMID: 23631704BACKGROUND
  • Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Hurzeler M. Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement - clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1450-1458. doi: 10.1111/clr.13012. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

    PMID: 28333394BACKGROUND
  • Barbisan A, Dias CS, Bavia PF, Sapata VM, Cesar-Neto JB, Silva CO. Soft Tissues Changes After Immediate and Delayed Single Implant Placement in Esthetic Area: A Systematic Review. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Oct;41(5):612-9. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00095. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

    PMID: 24475930BACKGROUND
  • Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12666. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

    PMID: 27978602BACKGROUND
  • Huynh-Ba G, Hoders AB, Meister DJ, Prihoda TJ, Mills MP, Mealey BL, Cochran DL. Esthetic, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of two surgical approaches for single implant in the esthetic area: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial with parallel design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Aug;30(8):745-759. doi: 10.1111/clr.13458. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

    PMID: 31099929BACKGROUND
  • Cosyn J, De Lat L, Seyssens L, Doornewaard R, Deschepper E, Vervaeke S. The effectiveness of immediate implant placement for single tooth replacement compared to delayed implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:224-241. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13054.

    PMID: 30624808BACKGROUND
  • Bramanti E, Norcia A, Cicciu M, Matacena G, Cervino G, Troiano G, Zhurakivska K, Laino L. Postextraction Dental Implant in the Aesthetic Zone, Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun;29(4):1037-1041. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004419.

    PMID: 29489581BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bone Resorption

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Guillem Esteve-Pardo

    Aula Dental Avanzada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 10 receiving immediate implant placement with Socket-Shield Technique and 10 receiving immediate implant placement with complete extraction of the tooth. (n=20)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2021

First Posted

March 17, 2021

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 25, 2025

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

August 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan to share with other researches.

Locations