Study of Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior Around Abutments on Implants.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: To compare the loss of peri-implant tissue by means of radiographic and digital analysis of a zirconia prosthesis placed immediately and delay loading. Materials and methods: 60 consecutive patients with the need for a full-arch rehabilitation were selected and divided randomly into two groups: Group A: Conventional dental extraction, placement of 6 to 8 implants. Placement of the multi-unit prosthetic attachment and finally in the same week the placement of the definitive monolithic zirconia prosthesis on implants. Group B: Conventional dental extraction, placement of 6 to 8 implants. Placement of prosthetic and provisional attachment. After 3 months, place the definitive prosthesis. Assess volumetric changes using radiographic and optical scan techniques. The number of implant failures, prosthetic incidents and bone loss around the implants will be evaluated. The data will be evaluated 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2023
CompletedJune 29, 2023
June 1, 2023
2.6 years
May 7, 2023
June 20, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Overall result of final prosthesis
The final prosthesis will be judged by the patient. A 10 cm Visual analogue scale (VAS) is used. 0 (unacceptable) is placed in left end, and 10 (perfect) is placed in the right end.
One day
Gingival index
The Gingival Index will be assessed according to a modified version of Loe and Silness and scored as: 0 = normal mucosa, 1 = bleeding with superficial probing, or 2 = spontaneous bleeding.
One day
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated separately in function and esthetics using a scale with ratings of 0 to 10 where 10 = fully satisfied and 0 = not satisfied.
One day
Bone-implant contact
A single independent calibrated examiner will made linear measurements on each periapical radiograph from the most mesial and distal point of the implant platform to the crestal bone.
One day
Study Arms (2)
Early loading
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe implants will be restored with a PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) prosthesis in normal occlusion.
Immediate loading
EXPERIMENTALThe implants will be restored with a permanent prosthesis (monolithic zirconia) placed on the implants as an immediate loading.
Interventions
Clinical and radiographic examination of the periimplant soft and hard tissue will be analysed by using gingival index, plaque index, and pocket depth immediately post operative.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years of age
- Physically and mentally capable of completing the 1-year follow-up
- With a stable occlusal relationship with or without opposing dentition
- Are willing and able to comply with study-related procedures
- Have good oral hygiene
- Present good quality and quantity of bone for implant placement.
- Must be American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, periodontal stable, and can enroll in a periodontal maintenance program.
You may not qualify if:
- Health conditions that do not permit surgical or restorative procedures (including anesthesia).
- Disorder in the planned implant area (eg, previous tumors, chronic bone disease, or previous irradiation).
- History of alcohol or drug abuse
- Smoke more than one pack of cigarettes per day (\> 20 cigarettes or equivalent)
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Bisphosphonate therapy
- Pathologic occlusion, (eg, severe bruxism or other parafunctional habits)
- Lack opposing dentition or has unstable occlusion
- Needs of bone augmentations or sinus lift treatments
- Ongoing infections or endodontic or periodontal problems in opposing teeth or implants
- Poor oral hygiene
- Allergic or adverse reactions to the restorative material.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Universitaria d'Odontologia
Sant Cugat Del Vallés, Barcelona, 08195, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Gomez-Polo M, Ballesteros J, Perales-Padilla P, Perales-Pulido P, Gomez-Polo C, Ortega R. Guided implant scanning: A procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.022. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
PMID: 31761274BACKGROUNDSuarez-Feito JM, Sicilia A, Angulo J, Banerji S, Cuesta I, Millar B. Clinical performance of provisional screw-retained metal-free acrylic restorations in an immediate loading implant protocol: a 242 consecutive patients' report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Dec;21(12):1360-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01956.x.
PMID: 20637035BACKGROUNDMeneghetti P, Moura GF, Tavelli L, Li J, Siqueira R, Wang HL, Mendonca G. A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: A case report. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Dec;33(8):1070-1076. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12798. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
PMID: 34213055BACKGROUNDEspona J, Roig E, Ali A, Roig M. Immediately loaded interim complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with a completely digital workflow: A clinical technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct;124(4):423-427. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
PMID: 31862143BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MIGUEL ROIG CAYON, MD DDS PHD
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The clinician performs the treatment of implant placement and prosthesis and the investigator analyzes the hard and soft tissue changes recorded over time.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Restorative Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2023
First Posted
June 29, 2023
Study Start
September 14, 2020
Primary Completion
May 1, 2023
Study Completion
May 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data will be published