Comparing Strategies for Implementing Primary HPV Screening
1 other identifier
interventional
45,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cervical cancer screening is an important component of women's health care. Most adult women are familiar with the conventional screening modality, Pap test, which has successfully reduced the burden of cervical cancer in industrialized countries. However, Pap test has limited accuracy and can miss a progressing disease. Advancement in knowledge and technology has led to changes in national recommendations to focus on the testing of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the cause of cervical cancer. Screening with primary HPV testing detects more diseases compared with Pap test alone or co-testing, and requires less number of tests. However, despite the advantages of primary HPV screening over conventional approaches, the switch to primary HPV screening is limited in the United States. The scientific literature reports barriers at both the provider and women level, which include lack of knowledge, resistance, and attachment to Pap test. We currently have insufficient guidance on how to select and deploy implementation strategies most likely to facilitate use of newly recommended cancer screening modality. This project seeks to generate evidence regarding effective strategies to achieve successful implementation of the primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large community-based health care system. A successful implementation will be defined by uptake of the primary HPV screening, adequate knowledge of the HPV test for both patients and providers, and patient/provider satisfaction during the transition. This project is important to most adult women, as a timely adoption of the best evidence-based cancer screening approach means better patient outcomes. Further, the proposed project will not only inform about cervical cancer screening, but other clinical conditions when a physician practice change is recommended by professional societies and/or national guideline body. By engaging patients, providers and other professional stakeholders in this project, we ensure that successful project outcomes are those most important for women and their doctors. Further, the stakeholder partners will help ensure generalizability of our findings to other health care systems, design strategies that maximize completeness in data collection, and lead the dissemination effort for wide application of the knowledge to be gained in this project.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedDecember 30, 2021
December 1, 2021
3.5 years
April 30, 2020
December 22, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Uptake of primary HPV testing
Proportion of primary HPV testing of all cervical cancer screening performed for women age 30-65 at the provider level.
Within the 3 months after the end of the 2 months intervention window
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Provider-centered outcomes
Within the 3 months after the end of the 2 months intervention window
Patient-centered outcomes
Within the 3 months after the end of the 2 months intervention window
Time to colposcopy after a positive test result
Within the 6 months after the end of the 2 months intervention window
Study Arms (2)
Local Tailoring
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention arm will consist of six KPSC service areas randomly assigned to the intervention arm. Immediately after primary HPV screening opens at KPSC, the intervention arm will receive the local tailoring interventions. All providers (physicians, nurses and medical assistants) and department administrator from the primary care departments (family medicine and internal medicine) and the department of obstetrics and gynecology at these six service areas randomized to this arm will be included in the study, as well as female patients at these service areas between age 30-65 who received cervical cancer screening during the data collection period.
Hybrid Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONThe hybrid-usual care arm will consist of six KPSC service areas randomly assigned to this arm. The hybrid usual care arm will receive regional educational activities for the transition (as will the intervention arm) before the roll out of primary HPV testing. However, they will not receive any research-led intervention or adaptation guidance after primary HPV screening opens at KPSC. All providers (physicians, nurses and medical assistants) and department administrator from the primary care departments (family medicine and internal medicine) and the department of obstetrics and gynecology at these six service areas randomized to this arm will be included in the study, as well as female patients at these service areas between age 30-65 who received cervical cancer screening during the data collection period.
Interventions
The "guided local tailoring" approach will employ a standard structured process, including (1) convening a project team, (2) conducting a local diagnostic process to identify likely barriers using provider/patient survey and interviews with providers/administrators, (3) selecting from a pre-developed menu of implementation strategies categorized by core function (form and function menu), and (4) deploying the selected strategies in collaboration with local implementation and improvement consultants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This is a cluster randomized trial. All KPSC's 12 service areas except Orange Country will be randomized and included in this study. All providers (physicians, nurses and medical assistants) and department administrator from the primary care departments (family medicine and internal medicine) and the department of obstetrics and gynecology at these 12 service areas randomized to this arm will be included in the study, as well as female patients at these service areas between age 30-65 who received cervical cancer screening during the data collection period.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are younger than 30 years old
- Providers working for departments other than Ob/Gyn, family or internal medicine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chun Chaolead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Pasadena, California, 91101, United States
Related Publications (5)
Hahn EE, Munoz-Plaza C, Hsu C, Cannizzaro NT, Ngo-Metzger Q, Gould MK, Mittman BS, Hodeib M, Tewari D, Chao CR. Locally-tailored vs. centrally-administered strategies for implementation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an integrated healthcare system: a qualitative research study. Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 15;5:1595934. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1595934. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40735691DERIVEDChao CR, Cannizzaro N, Hahn EE, Shen E, Hsu C, Ngo-Metzger Q, Gould MK, Munoz-Plaza CE, Kanter MH, Wride P, Ajamian LH, Hodeib M, Broder BI, Curiel IT, Castaneda A, Ong SK, Tewari K, Eskander RN, Tewari D, Mittman BS. A pragmatic randomized trial to compare strategies for implementing primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large healthcare system. Implement Sci. 2025 May 12;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01432-9.
PMID: 40355876DERIVEDCannizzaro NT, Mittman BS, Hahn EE, Ngo-Metzger Q, Gould MK, Hsu C, Shen E, Tewari D, Chao CR. Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening: Women's Perceptions of New Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Dec;33(12):1614-1624. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1180. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
PMID: 39258727DERIVEDChao CR, Cannizzaro NT, Hahn EE, Tewari D, Ngo-Metzger Q, Hsu C, Shen E, Wride P, Hodeib M, Gould M, Mittman BS. A study protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial for comparing strategies for implementing primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large health care system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jan;124:106994. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106994. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
PMID: 36336248DERIVEDHahn EE, Munoz-Plaza C, Altman DE, Hsu C, Cannizzaro NT, Ngo-Metzger Q, Wride P, Gould MK, Mittman BS, Hodeib M, Tewari KS, Ajamian LH, Eskander RN, Tewari D, Chao CR. De-implementation and substitution of clinical care processes: stakeholder perspectives on the transition to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening. Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Sep 23;2(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00211-z.
PMID: 34556189DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chun R Chao, PhD
KPSC Department of Research and Evaluation
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Devansu Tewari, MD
KPSC Orange County Medical Center Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2020
First Posted
May 1, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 18, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
December 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12