The Influence of Clinical Pharmacist on the Quality of Drug Prescribing and Rehabilitation Outcomes in Post-acute Hip Fractured Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The influence of clinical pharmacist on various drug related outcomes was reported in different healthcare setting including the community, long term care and during acute hospitalization. Nevertheless, data on the influence of clinical pharmacist intervention on the quality of drug prescribing and rehabilitation outcomes in post-acute hip fractured patients is scarce. The aims of the current study are to evaluate the contribution of a clinical pharmacist on the appropriateness of drug prescribing among post-acute geriatric hip fractured patients and to investigate whether this involvement can improve rehabilitation outcomes. The investigators hypothesis is that early review of geriatric hip fractured patients medical record by a clinical pharmacist will improve the appropriateness of drug treatment and the rehabilitation outcomes among this population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedApril 11, 2023
April 1, 2023
2.2 years
April 16, 2020
April 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Summated Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score
The change from admission to discharge in the summated medication appropriateness index score. Each medication can get a score between 0-18, with a higher score indicating inappropriateness of more drug elements.
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) score
The change from admission to discharge in the anticholinergic cognitive burden score. Each medication can get a score between 0-3, with a higher score indicating a higher anticholinergic burden.
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
The change in medication discrepancy
The number of medication discrepancy and underuse of drugs
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
The change in overused drugs
The number of overused or misused drugs
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
The change in Functional Independence measure (FIM) score
The change from admission to discharge in the Functional Independence measure score. the score is calculated for each patient and can be between 18-126, with a higher score indicating a better functional independence status.
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
The change in motor functional independence measure (mFIM)
The change from admission to discharge in motor functional independence measure score. the score is calculated for each patient and can be between 18-91, with a higher score indicating a better motor functional independence status.
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
The change in Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)
The relative functional gain (motor functional independence measure effectiveness) achieved on the motor functional independence measure score. The Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS) is calculated as the motor functional independence measure score change (discharge score minus admission score) divided by the motor functional independence measure maximum score (a score of 91) minus the motor functional independence measure admission score. The Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score can be between -80 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better motor functional independence measure effectiveness (a higher relative functional gain during rehabilitation).
Admission (baseline value) and at discharge (approximately 5 weeks post admission)
LOS (Length Of Stay)
Length of rehabilitation center stay
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Clinical pharmacist intervention group
ACTIVE COMPARATORall hip fractured patients admitted to D1 subunit in "Beit rivka" geriatric rehabilitation center. This group will get a clinical pharmacist review of their medication and a pharmaceutical counseling to the medical staff in the first few days of admission (1-5 days post admission)
control group
OTHERThe control group will include all hip fractured patients admitted to D2 subunit in "Beit rivka" geriatric rehabilitation center. This group will not receive any pharmacist intervention during their rehabilitation.
Interventions
Pharmaceutical intervention will include a complete medication review by a clinical pharmacist with the following process: medication reconciliation, medication indication and dosage check, medication effectiveness and appropriateness assessment, drug-drug or drug-disease interactions check, medication duplications check, length and cost of treatment evaluation. The pharmacist will use the following tools: Medication appropriateness index (MAI), ACB (Anticholinergic cognitive burden) score and the using the assessment of underutilization (AOU) index.
A multidisciplinary team provided medical, nursing, physical, occupational, and social work interventions. Rehabilitation care include: (a) individual physical therapy (PT), 2 to 3 times a week; (b) 30 to 40 min of PT in an adapted fitness room, aerobic training on a treadmill with and without partial weight support and stationary bicycles, 2 to 3 times a week ; (c) 30 to 40 min of virtual reality training by performing challenging functional tasks, 2 times a week and (d) 30 to 45 min of individual occupational therapy (OT), cognitive evaluation and stimulation, safety education, and learning to use assistive devices, 3 times a week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elderly patient (65 years of older) who were admitted for rehabilitation after hip fracture at "D" ward in beit rivka post-acute geriatric center.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient that did not complete the rehabilitation period due the following causes: death, acute care hospitalization or severe medical deterioration.
- In the case of D2 sub unit hospitalized patient - any request by the sub unit medical or nursing staff for pharmacist consultation/intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beit Rivka geriatric rehabilitation center
Petah Tikva, Israel
Related Publications (24)
Boparai MK, Korc-Grodzicki B. Prescribing for older adults. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;78(4):613-26. doi: 10.1002/msj.20278.
PMID: 21748749BACKGROUNDSpinewine A, Fialova D, Byrne S. The role of the pharmacist in optimizing pharmacotherapy in older people. Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):495-510. doi: 10.2165/11631720-000000000-00000.
PMID: 22642783BACKGROUNDWalsh KA, O'Riordan D, Kearney PM, Timmons S, Byrne S. Improving the appropriateness of prescribing in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacists' interventions in secondary care. Age Ageing. 2016 Mar;45(2):201-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv190. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
PMID: 26755524BACKGROUNDGeller AI, Nopkhun W, Dows-Martinez MN, Strasser DC. Polypharmacy and the role of physical medicine and rehabilitation. PM R. 2012 Mar;4(3):198-219. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.02.012.
PMID: 22443958BACKGROUNDPerez T, Moriarty F, Wallace E, McDowell R, Redmond P, Fahey T. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people in primary care and its association with hospital admission: longitudinal study. BMJ. 2018 Nov 14;363:k4524. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4524.
PMID: 30429122BACKGROUNDIaboni A, Rawson K, Burkett C, Lenze EJ, Flint AJ. Potentially Inappropriate Medications and the Time to Full Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture. Drugs Aging. 2017 Sep;34(9):723-728. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0482-6.
PMID: 28776209BACKGROUNDKragh Ekstam A, Elmstahl S. Do fall-risk-increasing drugs have an impact on mortality in older hip fracture patients? A population-based cohort study. Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Apr 29;11:489-96. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S101832. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27199553BACKGROUNDLee JK, Alshehri S, Kutbi HI, Martin JR. Optimizing pharmacotherapy in elderly patients: the role of pharmacists. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2015 Aug 11;4:101-111. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S70404. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 29354524BACKGROUNDGillespie U, Alassaad A, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Morlin C, Henrohn D, Bertilsson M, Melhus H. Effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing and evaluation of the instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') ability to predict hospitalization--analyses from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 May 17;8(5):e62401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062401. Print 2013.
PMID: 23690938BACKGROUNDViktil KK, Blix HS. The impact of clinical pharmacists on drug-related problems and clinical outcomes. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008 Mar;102(3):275-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00206.x. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
PMID: 18248511BACKGROUNDLee JK, Slack MK, Martin J, Ehrman C, Chisholm-Burns M. Geriatric patient care by U.S. pharmacists in healthcare teams: systematic review and meta-analyses. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jul;61(7):1119-27. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12323. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
PMID: 23796001BACKGROUNDHanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, Cohen HJ, Feussner JR. A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1045-51. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90144-c.
PMID: 1474400BACKGROUNDSamsa GP, Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Weinberger M, Clipp EC, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, Landsman PB, Cohen HJ. A summated score for the medication appropriateness index: development and assessment of clinimetric properties including content validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8):891-6. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90192-9.
PMID: 7730892BACKGROUNDSomers A, Mallet L, van der Cammen T, Robays H, Petrovic M. Applicability of an adapted medication appropriateness index for detection of drug-related problems in geriatric inpatients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;10(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
PMID: 22304791BACKGROUNDSpinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane KL, Swine C, Hanlon JT. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):173-184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61091-5.
PMID: 17630041BACKGROUNDSalahudeen MS, Duffull SB, Nishtala PS. Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2015 Mar 25;15:31. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0029-9.
PMID: 25879993BACKGROUNDOttenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Dec;75(12):1297-301.
PMID: 7993167BACKGROUNDGranger CV, Hamilton BB. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;73(1):51-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 8305182BACKGROUNDHeruti RJ, Lusky A, Barell V, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Cognitive status at admission: does it affect the rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):432-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90281-2.
PMID: 10206606BACKGROUNDRolland Y, Pillard F, Lauwers-Cances V, Busquere F, Vellas B, Lafont C. Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture and cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Apr 8;26(7):425-31. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001663148.
PMID: 15204479BACKGROUNDCornu P, Steurbaut S, Leysen T, De Baere E, Ligneel C, Mets T, Dupont AG. Effect of medication reconciliation at hospital admission on medication discrepancies during hospitalization and at discharge for geriatric patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;46(4):484-94. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q594. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
PMID: 22414793BACKGROUNDBulloch MN, Olin JL. Instruments for evaluating medication use and prescribing in older adults. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 Sep-Oct;54(5):530-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13244.
PMID: 25216883BACKGROUNDFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 1202204BACKGROUNDSpinewine A, Swine C, Dhillon S, Lambert P, Nachega JB, Wilmotte L, Tulkens PM. Effect of a collaborative approach on the quality of prescribing for geriatric inpatients: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):658-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01132.x.
PMID: 17493184BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Rehabilitation Department D, 'Beit Rivka' Geriatric Rehabilitation Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share