Ketamine Versus Magnesium Sulfate in the Time and Awakening Quality of General Anesthesia.
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The introduction of the laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy significantly reduced the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain, with improvement in other markers, such as patient satisfaction, and reduction in hospital stay. However, pain in the postoperative period of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still a concern that challenges modern anesthesiology. Ketamine and magnesium sulfate are two blockers of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors with the ability to reduce postoperative pain and postoperative opioid consumption. A frequent concern among anesthesiologists is the quality and time of awakening in patients receiving these medications The main objective of this trial is to compare the quality and time of awakening in patients receiving magnesium sulfate or ketamine. The secondary objective is to compare postoperative analgesia during the postoperative hospital stay. Hypothesis: Our hypothesis is that patients have a faster awakening when they receive magnesium sulfate as an analgesic adjunct, when compared to patients who receive ketamine . Design: this is a prospective, controlled, covered and randomly distributed trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 8, 2024
February 1, 2024
3.7 years
April 18, 2020
February 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time for awakening
Time, after the end of anesthetic administration, to get the bispectral index (BIS) \> 60.
Three hours
Awakening quality
Questions related to name, place, time, reason for hospitalization and verbal learning test, consisting of 15 words that the patient will be asked to repeat 20 minutes after hearing them. The wrong answers will be compared among groups.
Three hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative pain
Two days
Postoperative analgesia
Two days
Study Arms (4)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients in this group will receive general balanced anesthesia
Ketamine group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in this group will receive 0.3 mg / kg of ketamine in saline (total volume of 100 ml) 15 min before general balanced anesthetic induction
Magnesium sulfate group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in this group will receive 40 mg / kg of magnesium sulfate in saline solution (total volume of 100 ml) 15 min before general balanced anesthetic induction
Magnesium / ketamine group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in this group will receive 0.15 mg / kg of ketamine + 20 mg / kg of magnesium sulfate in saline solution (total volume of 100 ml) 15 min before general balanced anesthetic induction
Interventions
Balanced general anesthesia. Induction with lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol and cisatracurium. Maintenance with sevoflurane.
ketamine 0.3 mg / kg 15 minutes before balanced general anesthesia. Induction with lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol and cisatracurium. Maintenance with sevoflurane.
Magnesium sulfate 40 mg / kg 15 minutes before balanced general anesthesia. Induction with lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol and cisatracurium. Maintenance with sevoflurane.
Ketamine 0.15 mg/kg plus magnesium sulfate 20 mg/kg 15 minutes before balanced general anesthesia. Induction with lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol and cisatracurium. Maintenance with sevoflurane
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, agreement to voluntarily participate in the trial and sign the free and informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Coronary disease, ventricular atrial block II or worse, with renal failure , previous history of brain disease, dementia or other psychiatric diseases, and patients with a body mass index\> 35 kg / m² , allergy to any products used in the trial, preoperative use of opioids or corticosteroids.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital da Beneficência Portuguesa de Santos
Santos, São Paulo, 11065910, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
REFERENCES 1. Hendolin HI, Pääkkönen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg. 2000; 166: 394-9. 2. Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Mealy K, Stephens RB. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Annlas of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1992; 74: 397-400. 3. Keus F, by Jong J, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJHM. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006231. 4. Barazanchi AWH, MacFater WS, Rahiri JL, Tutone S, Hill AG, Joshi GP. Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121: 787-803. 5. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain. 2001 ; 90: 261-9. 6. Ye Fan, Wu Y, Zhou C. Effect of intravenous ketamine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017; 96: 51 7. Launo C, Bassi C, Spagnolo L, Badano S, Ricci C, Lizzi A, et al. Preemptive ketamine during general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004; 70: 727-38. 8. Hang LH, Shao DH, Gu YP. The ED50 and ED95 of ketamine for prevention of postoperative hyperalgesia after remifentanil-based anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141: w13195 . 9. Minds O, Harlak A, Yigit T, Balkan A, Balkan M, Cosar A, et al. Effect of intraoperative magnesium sulphate infusion on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 52: 1353-9. 10. Chen C, Tao R. The impact of magnesium sulfate on pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan. 2018; 28: 349-53. 11. Valentin LSS, Pietrobon R, Junior WA, et al. Definition and application of a battery of neuropsychological tests to assess postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Einstein. 2015; 13: 20-6.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joaquim Vieira
University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The person responsible for generating the sequence will use the result of the lottery to number the opaque envelopes and place the intervention corresponding to the group to which that lottery number belongs. This professional will not administer anesthesia to the patients in the study and will not participate in the collection or evaluation of the studied variables. The envelopes will be opened by professionals who will prepare the corresponding solution, keeping this information covered for the other members of the team and for the patients. The groups will be covered up for patients and for professionals who carry out the assessments.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
March 14, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share