Environmental Localization Mapping and Guidance for Visual Prosthesis Users
SLAM
2 other identifiers
interventional
26
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study is driven by the hypothesis that independent navigation by blind users of visual prosthetic devices can be greatly aided by use of an autonomous navigational aid that provides information about the environment and guidance for navigation through multimodal sensory cues. For this study, the investigators developed a navigation system that uses on-board sensing to map the user's environment and compute navigable paths to desired destinations in real-time. Information regarding obstacles and directional guidance is communicated to the user via a combination of sensory modalities including limited vision (through the user's visual prosthesis), haptic, and audio cues. This study evaluates how effectively this navigational aid improves prosthetic vision users' ability to perform navigational tasks. The participants for this study include both retinal prosthesis users of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Argus II) and normally sighted individuals who use a virtual reality headset to simulate the limited vision of the Argus II system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 10, 2025
CompletedMarch 10, 2025
February 1, 2025
3.5 years
April 21, 2020
January 23, 2025
February 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Duration of Time to Complete Navigational Tasks as Assessed by the Mean Duration of Travel in Seconds Normalized by the Nominal Path Distance in Meters
Participants will be asked to complete the navigation tasks of crossing an obstacle field approximately 6 meters in length and navigating to a target destination located about 20 - 30 meters away. The normalized duration of time to complete each navigation task will be measured in seconds. To account for variability in the path distances of different trials, the measured time will be normalized by a reference (nominal) path distance in meters associated with the configuration of each trial. The mean normalized time across all trials will be computed for each intervention.
Up to 7 minutes for each navigation task, on Day 1 or Day 2
Distance Traversed to Complete Navigational Tasks as Assessed by the Mean Distance Traveled in Meters Normalized by the Nominal Path Distance in Meters
Participants will be asked to complete the navigation tasks of crossing an obstacle field approximately 6 meters in length and navigating to a target destination located about 20 - 30 meters away. The normalized distance traversed to complete each navigation task will be measured. To account for variability in the path distances of different trials, the measured distance will be normalized by a reference (nominal) path distance in meters associated with the configuration of each trial. The mean normalized distance across all trials will be computed for each intervention.
Up to 7 minutes for each navigation task, on Day 1 or Day 2
Obstacle Avoidance While Completing Navigational Tasks as Assessed by the Mean Number of Contacts With Obstacles Normalized by the Nominal Path Distance in Meters
Participants will be asked to complete the navigation tasks of crossing an obstacle field approximately 6 meters in length and navigating to a target destination located about 20 - 30 meters away. The number of contacts with obstacles encountered while completing each navigation task will be measured. To account for variability in the path distances of different trials, the number of contacts will be normalized by a reference (nominal) path distance in meters associated with the configuration of each trial. The mean normalized number of contacts with obstacles across all trials will be computed for each intervention.
Up to 7 minutes for each navigation task, on Day 1 or Day 2
Success in Completing Navigational Tasks as Assessed by the Mean Percentage of Trials Where Participants Successfully Reached the Intended Destination
Participants will be asked to navigate to a target destination located about 20 - 30 meters away. We will measure success rate as the mean number of trials for which each participants successfully reached the intended destination divided by the total number of trials performed by that participant for each intervention.
Up to 7 minutes for each navigation task, on Day 1 or Day 2
Accuracy of Relative Distance Judgments as Assessed by the Percentage of Correct Responses
Participants will be presented with two physical objects and asked to identify which of the objects is the nearer one after walking a controlled distance down a centerline oriented between the objects. We will measure accuracy as the percentage of correct responses (the total number of correct responses divided by the total number of trials times 100).
Up to 60 seconds for each discrimination task, on Day 1 or Day 2
Study Arms (2)
Evaluation of normally sighted participants using a simulated visual prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALAll normally sighted participants will be assigned to this arm of the study. This study group will perform all experiments using a virtual reality headset (Oculus Go) to simulate the limited vision of a retinal prosthesis system. This study group will include all interventions, including those that both match and exceed the visual performance of the Argus II system.
Evaluation of blind participants using the Argus II retinal prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALAll blind participants who have been implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System will be assigned to this arm of the study. This study group will be limited to performing a subset of the interventions including only those that do not exceed the visual performance of the Argus II system.
Interventions
This intervention uses the navigational aid with the output sensory modalities configured as follows: * Vision: Argus mode * Haptics: none * Audio: none Since this mode only provides the standard Argus vision, it is equivalent to using the base Argus II system without the navigational aid.
This intervention uses the navigational aid with the output sensory modalities configured as follows: * Vision: Depth mode (at Argus II resolution and field-of-view) * Haptics: none * Audio: none
This intervention uses the navigational aid with the output sensory modalities configured as follows: * Vision: Depth mode (at Argus II resolution and field-of-view) * Haptics: yes * Audio: yes
This intervention uses the navigational aid with the output sensory modalities configured as follows: * Vision: none * Haptics: yes * Audio: yes Since this mode does not provide any visual feedback, it is equivalent to using navigational aid completely blind without a visual prosthesis.
This intervention uses the navigational aid with the output sensory modalities configured as follows: * Vision: High Field-of-View Depth mode (at twice the Argus II resolution and field-of-view along each dimension) * Haptics: none * Audio: none
This intervention performs the relative distance to two obstacles test with the user's vision output configured as follows: * Resolution: Low * Field-of-View: Low
This intervention performs the relative distance to two obstacles test with the user's vision output configured as follows: * Resolution: Low * Field-of-View: High
This intervention performs the relative distance to two obstacles test with the user's vision output configured as follows: * Resolution: High * Field-of-View: Low
This intervention performs the relative distance to two obstacles test with the user's vision output configured as follows: * Resolution: High * Field-of-View: High
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is at least 25 years of age;
- Subject has been implanted with the Argus II system;
- Subject's eye has healed from surgery and the surgeon has cleared the subject for programming;
- Subject has the cognitive and communication ability to participate in the study (i.e., follow spoken directions, perform tests, and give feedback);
- Subject is willing to conduct psychophysics testing up to 4-6 hours per day of testing on 3-5 consecutive days;
- Subject is capable of understanding patient information materials and giving written informed consent;
- Subject is able to walk unassisted.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is unwilling or unable to travel to testing facility for at least 3 days of testing within a one-week timeframe;
- Subject does not speak English;
- Subject has language or hearing impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Carnegie Mellon Universitycollaborator
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Johns Hopkins Medicine - Wilmer Eye Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
Laurel, Maryland, 20723, United States
Related Publications (1)
Christie B, Norena Acosta N, Sadeghi R, Kartha A, Ewulum C, Caspi A, Tenore FV, Dagnelie G, Klatzky RL, Billings SD. Autonomous multisensory enhancement of a visual neuroprosthesis for navigation: Technical proof-of-concept with simulated prosthetic vision and single-subject case study of a visual prosthesis user. J Neural Eng. 2026 Jan 26. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ae3d67. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41587489DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Seth Billings
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Seth Billings, Ph.D.
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
March 16, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
March 10, 2025
Results First Posted
March 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Results from this study will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. However, IPD will not be shared outside the study team.