NCT04319809

Brief Summary

The proposed project seeks to provide object recognition as a feature in a retinal implant system. Participants will be able to direct an object recognition application to find a desired object in the field of view of the head-mounted camera, and to direct the participant's view towards it through the presentation of a recognizable icon. A prototype system will be developed and evaluated in human subjects in phase I. A full system implementation and a second phase of the trial will be completed in phase II.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2020

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2022

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 15, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

March 16, 2020

Results QC Date

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

retinitis pigmentosaArgus II retinal prosthesis system

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Performance (Completion Time) Locating a Cell Phone and a Person

    This outcome measure compares time to task completion without and with modalities of the subsystem for both a stationary and mobility task. For the stationary task, participants were seated in front of a table and a cell phone was placed randomly at the center of one of ten rectangular zones. Participants were asked to find and put their hand on the location of the cell phone. The time of the response was recorded (and the distance from the cell phone, which is a separate primary outcome). For the mobility task, participants were asked to find a target person in an otherwise empty room with dark walls. Once the participant got within arm's length, the target person would initiate a handshake. The time and number of steps (a separate primary outcome) were recorded. If the person wasn't found within 5 minutes, the task was stopped and scored as incomplete.

    Time in seconds to complete task. Stationary task time was time to placing hand on the table with the cell phone and mobility task time was time to handshake with the target person.

  • Accuracy (Distance From Target)

    This outcome measure compares task completion (accuracy to a target) without and with modalities of the subsystem for both a stationary and mobility task. For the stationary task, participants were seated in front of a table and a cell phone was placed randomly at the center of one of ten rectangular zones. Participants were asked to find and put their hand on the location of the cell phone. The distance to the cell phone in centimeters was recorded. For the mobility task, participants were asked to find a target person in an otherwise empty room with dark walls. Once the participant got within arm's length, the target person would initiate a handshake. The number of steps were recorded. If the person wasn't found within 5 minutes, the task was stopped and scored as incomplete.

    Distance to cell phone required up to 30 minutes per mode and distance to a person required up to 45 minutes per mode.

Study Arms (1)

Device feasibility

EXPERIMENTAL

To investigate the utility of a device adaptation allowing Argus II users to detect the presence and location of desired objects. Performance of the unaided Argus II system will be compared with performance using the system augmented with object recognition.

Device: Object recognition subsystem

Interventions

The object recognition subsystem is an add-on to the Argus II retinal prosthesis system. in the early stage of the study the subsystem will run on a separate processor; in the later stage the subsystem will run in the Argus II user's video processing unit.

Device feasibility

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • For healthy volunteers: Vision corrected to 20/25, good general health
  • For retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients: End-stage retinitis pigmentosa, recipient of an Argus II retinal prosthesis system

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Retinitis Pigmentosa

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases, HereditaryEye DiseasesRetinal DystrophiesRetinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sara Seifert, President
Organization
Minnesota HealthSolutions

Study Officials

  • Gislin Dagnelie, PhD

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a small sample open label feasibility study for an object recognition and localization system based on machine learning
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2020

First Posted

March 24, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion

August 31, 2022

Study Completion

August 31, 2022

Last Updated

October 15, 2024

Results First Posted

October 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified data will be available from the investigative team, following initial publication of the results

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Spring 2022 onward
Access Criteria
Any researchers wit ha legitimate reason for wishing to re-analyze the data or compare them to study data collected in similar experiments

Locations