Object Finder for a Retinal Prosthesis
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed project seeks to provide object recognition as a feature in a retinal implant system. Participants will be able to direct an object recognition application to find a desired object in the field of view of the head-mounted camera, and to direct the participant's view towards it through the presentation of a recognizable icon. A prototype system will be developed and evaluated in human subjects in phase I. A full system implementation and a second phase of the trial will be completed in phase II.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 15, 2024
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
5.2 years
March 16, 2020
November 27, 2023
October 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Performance (Completion Time) Locating a Cell Phone and a Person
This outcome measure compares time to task completion without and with modalities of the subsystem for both a stationary and mobility task. For the stationary task, participants were seated in front of a table and a cell phone was placed randomly at the center of one of ten rectangular zones. Participants were asked to find and put their hand on the location of the cell phone. The time of the response was recorded (and the distance from the cell phone, which is a separate primary outcome). For the mobility task, participants were asked to find a target person in an otherwise empty room with dark walls. Once the participant got within arm's length, the target person would initiate a handshake. The time and number of steps (a separate primary outcome) were recorded. If the person wasn't found within 5 minutes, the task was stopped and scored as incomplete.
Time in seconds to complete task. Stationary task time was time to placing hand on the table with the cell phone and mobility task time was time to handshake with the target person.
Accuracy (Distance From Target)
This outcome measure compares task completion (accuracy to a target) without and with modalities of the subsystem for both a stationary and mobility task. For the stationary task, participants were seated in front of a table and a cell phone was placed randomly at the center of one of ten rectangular zones. Participants were asked to find and put their hand on the location of the cell phone. The distance to the cell phone in centimeters was recorded. For the mobility task, participants were asked to find a target person in an otherwise empty room with dark walls. Once the participant got within arm's length, the target person would initiate a handshake. The number of steps were recorded. If the person wasn't found within 5 minutes, the task was stopped and scored as incomplete.
Distance to cell phone required up to 30 minutes per mode and distance to a person required up to 45 minutes per mode.
Study Arms (1)
Device feasibility
EXPERIMENTALTo investigate the utility of a device adaptation allowing Argus II users to detect the presence and location of desired objects. Performance of the unaided Argus II system will be compared with performance using the system augmented with object recognition.
Interventions
The object recognition subsystem is an add-on to the Argus II retinal prosthesis system. in the early stage of the study the subsystem will run on a separate processor; in the later stage the subsystem will run in the Argus II user's video processing unit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For healthy volunteers: Vision corrected to 20/25, good general health
- For retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients: End-stage retinitis pigmentosa, recipient of an Argus II retinal prosthesis system
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Minnesota HealthSolutionslead
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Second Sight Medical Productscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sara Seifert, President
- Organization
- Minnesota HealthSolutions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gislin Dagnelie, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2020
First Posted
March 24, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 31, 2022
Study Completion
August 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Results First Posted
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Spring 2022 onward
- Access Criteria
- Any researchers wit ha legitimate reason for wishing to re-analyze the data or compare them to study data collected in similar experiments
Deidentified data will be available from the investigative team, following initial publication of the results