The Effectiviness of Pilates on the Risk of Fall in Healthy Older Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This research examine the effectiveness of a Pilates intervention for reducing the risk of falls among adults aged over 65 years. The effects were measured the Pilates classes with a supplementary home-based exercises in two phases: Phase I investigated (Mat Pilates supervised with a supplementary home-based Pilates exercise for the pre and post-test of 6 weeks intervention. Eligible 32 participants). The main study randomised controlled trial (phase II) investigate whether a Pilates intervention of 12 weeks with a supplementary at home program is effective in reducing falls risk factors. Pilates group which practiced Pilates and the control group which did not practice Pilates The aim of the study is to identify whether spatiotemporal gait parameters, mobility, postural stability parameters of anteroposterior and mediolateral (AP-ML), functional mobility, fear of falling and physical activity changes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2020
CompletedSeptember 2, 2020
April 1, 2020
5 months
April 9, 2020
August 31, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Falls Efficacy Scale
Participants should answer items thinking about how they usually do the activity and they should answer items to show how concerned they would be about falling: 1 = not at all concerned 2 = somewhat concerned 3 = fairly concerned 4 = very concerned. Total score ranging from 16 (not at all) to 64 (very much).
up to 12 weeks
Platform Footworkpro Pressure plate
Measure the two parameters of stabilometry in mediolateral (cm) and anteroposterior (cm) sway in static position performance
up to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
Baseline, post-test 12 weeks
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
Baseline, post-test 6 weeks
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Baseline, post-test 12 weeks
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Baseline, post-test 6 weeks
GAITRite® system
Baseline, post-test 12 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group
OTHERControl group without Pilates exercise during 12 weeks Participants were advised to keep their routine Falls diary calendar
Pilates group
EXPERIMENTALPilates classes were held twice weekly for one hour. The classes were divided into a warm-up, mat Pilates with accessories and a cool-down. Participants used small items of equipment such as bands, circles or rings, blocks, spyke balls and foam rollers. The intervention lasted 12 weeks; the classes were supervised twice a week. The supervised exercises were evaluated every four weeks (frequency and intensity) focused on the lower limb (muscles related to gait), core and trunk (muscles related to posture). The participants were asked to perform supplementary at-home workouts three times a week using a booklet and video that was provided to the participants. The video and booklet to introduce the six principles of Pilates, warm-up exercises, exercises on the chair, mat Pilates exercises and cool-down exercises. Participants were advised to perform these exercises three times a week for 30 minutes at home.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Those over 65 years older, both male and female, healthy and able to attend the Pilates sessions regularly were included. Those included had not had surgery in the past six months, had no restriction recommended by their General Practitioner and had a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of over 26
You may not qualify if:
- Those excluded had a MOCA score of less than 26, had a fall in the last six months. had several pain, had acute inflammation, had a history of neurological illness, had medical and pharmacologic contraindications to exercise, vertigo or had a strong exercise routine already.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larissa Donatoni da Silva, Phd student
National University of Ireland, Galway
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2020
First Posted
April 13, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04