The Effect of Fluids on Aortic VTI During C-section
The Influence of Intravascular Fluid Administration on Aortic Velocity Time Integral in Obstetric Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pregnancy is associated with a myriad of physiologic changes, including expansion of blood volume, decrease in oncotic pressure, and increased cardiac output. The obstetric population is associated with intrapartum hemorrhage. Accordingly, it is important to have an accurate method to assess fluid status in intrapartum patients. The use of standard volume assessment tools including arterial lines and central venous catheters is limited given the brevity of obstetric procedures and the morbidity of these techniques on the awake patients, and the costs. Non-invasive methods to assess volume status (carotid dopplers, direct measurement of blood loss, bio-impedance devices) are imperfect. Echocardiography is an attractive tool to measure fluid status in experienced operators such as anesthesiologists. IVC diameter and variation of aortic velocity time integral are two measures that can be obtained via echocardiography and been studied in spontaneously breathing patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether these measurements can be used in the assessment of volume status in the laboring patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedApril 22, 2024
April 1, 2024
5.8 years
March 28, 2020
April 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
aortic velocity time integral
the percent change in aortic velocity time integral as measured by transthoracic echo
at baseline measure, right after spinal placement (250mL LR), at 500mL LR infusion, and at 1 L LR infusion (approximately 20mins)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
inferior vena cava collapsibility
at baseline measure, right after spinal placement (250mL LR), at 500mL LR infusion, and at 1 L LR infusion (approximately 20mins)
change in systolic blood pressure
every 2.5 mins for 20 mins (when 1L LR is administered) once the pt has a spinal placement
change in heart rate
every 2.5 mins for 20 mins (when 1L LR is administered) once the pt has a spinal placement
Study Arms (4)
0 mL crystalloid
These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 0, at which time 0 mL of fluids will have been administered.
250 mL crystalloid.
These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 1, after the spinal has been placed and approximately 250 mL fluids has been administered.
500 mL crystalloid
These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 2, at which time 500 mL of fluids will have been administered.
1000 mL crystalloid
These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 3, at which time 1000 mL of fluids will have been administered.
Interventions
the intervention is one liter fluid bag of lactated ringers which is routinely used as a fluid coload for spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive the same amount of fluids however this will be paused at various time points in order to perform the echocardiogram.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients ages 18-35 undergoing elective cesarean section with planned spinal anesthetic at Ben Taub General Hospital (BTGH) will be screened. Consenting patients will undergo spinal anesthetic prior to planned procedure. All subjects will receive the same 1L fluid bolus intraoperatively.
You may qualify if:
- healthy nulliparous or multiparous pregnant women with a term (\>37 weeks gestation)
- age 18-35
- singleton pregnancy
- scheduled for Cesarean delivery with planned neuraxial spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia
- American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status 2
You may not qualify if:
- Patients without ability to provide informed consent
- American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status 3 or 4
- Emergency cesarean section
- BMI\>40
- Known cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities including chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, diabetes, asthma, renal disease
- Age \> 35
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ben Taub General Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (13)
Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration. Anesthesiology. 2005 Oct;103(4):744-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00012.
PMID: 16192766BACKGROUNDZieleskiewicz L, Noel A, Duclos G, Haddam M, Delmas A, Bechis C, Loundou A, Blanc J, Mignon A, Bouvet L, Einav S, Bourgoin A, Leone M. Can point-of-care ultrasound predict spinal hypotension during caesarean section? A prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jan;73(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/anae.14063. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
PMID: 28986931BACKGROUNDZieleskiewicz L, Bouvet L, Einav S, Duclos G, Leone M. Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound: applications in obstetric anaesthetic management. Anaesthesia. 2018 Oct;73(10):1265-1279. doi: 10.1111/anae.14354. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
PMID: 30047997BACKGROUNDLamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1125-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7. Epub 2007 May 17.
PMID: 17508199BACKGROUNDMcIntyre JP, Ellyett KM, Mitchell EA, Quill GM, Thompson JM, Stewart AW, Doughty RN, Stone PR; Maternal Sleep in Pregnancy Study Group. Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 28;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5.
PMID: 25886289BACKGROUNDHancock A, Weeks AD, Lavender DT. Is accurate and reliable blood loss estimation the 'crucial step' in early detection of postpartum haemorrhage: an integrative review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 28;15:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0653-6.
PMID: 26415952BACKGROUNDAirapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Levrard M, Ammenouche N, Seydi A, Tinturier F, Lobjoie E, Dupont H, Slama M. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care. 2015 Nov 13;19:400. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9.
PMID: 26563768BACKGROUNDBrun C, Zieleskiewicz L, Textoris J, Muller L, Bellefleur JP, Antonini F, Tourret M, Ortega D, Vellin A, Lefrant JY, Boubli L, Bretelle F, Martin C, Leone M. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2770-2. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
PMID: 23223774BACKGROUNDMuller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, Quintard H, Leone M, Zoric L, Lefrant JY; AzuRea group. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care. 2012 Oct 8;16(5):R188. doi: 10.1186/cc11672.
PMID: 23043910BACKGROUNDMaizel J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Tribouilloy C, Massy Z, Slama M. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1133-1138. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0642-y. Epub 2007 May 17.
PMID: 17508202BACKGROUNDGardin JM, Davidson DM, Rohan MK, Butman S, Knoll M, Garcia R, Dubria S, Gardin SK, Henry WL. Relationship between age, body size, gender, and blood pressure and Doppler flow measurements in the aorta and pulmonary artery. Am Heart J. 1987 Jan;113(1):101-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90016-0.
PMID: 2948377BACKGROUNDTawfik MM, Tarbay AI, Elaidy AM, Awad KA, Ezz HM, Tolba MA. Combined Colloid Preload and Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):304-312. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003306.
PMID: 29461392BACKGROUNDPractice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. No abstract available.
PMID: 26580836BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy Lee, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yi Deng, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudia Wei, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Obstetric Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2020
First Posted
April 1, 2020
Study Start
March 25, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
April 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share