Study Stopped
Lake of financing
Rehabilitation with Personalized Strategies According to Muscle Volume Before Knee Arthroplasty
REPERAGE
Personalized Rehabilitation Strategies According to Muscle Volume Before Knee Arthroplasty: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Preoperative rehabilitation before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been proven to be effective. Latest meta-analyzes do not find any improvement of motor performance during gait 6 months after surgery. However, most of the previous studies did not specifically target muscle atrophy to design rehabilitation protocol. Pre-operative muscle atrophy, although not systematic, is often observed. The preoperative muscles volumes of thigh muscles have been poorly identified and never used to adjust the pre operative rehabilitation strategy. As part of the "FOLLOWKNEE" (RHU) project, which attempts to implement a personalized management of TKA and its follow-up, this study wants to explore the potential effect of adapted treatment to improve muscle force and muscle volume before TKA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 27, 2022
CompletedMarch 19, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 years
March 19, 2020
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference of isometric strength D0-W4p
Isometric strength of quadriceps (QS) and hamstring (HS) will be measured on isokinetic bench and the difference between D0 and W4 will be calculated as follows : (QSW4p-QSD0)+(HSW4p-HSD0). Personalized rehabilitation will first be compared to classic rehabilitation and if positive to global rehabilitation.
Day 0 to Week 4 postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Difference of isometric strength D0-W4
Day 0 to Week 4
Difference of isometric strength D0-W12p
Day 0 to Week 12 postoperative
Muscles volumes
Day 0, Week 4, Week 2 postoperative
Walking speed on 10 meters
Day 0, Week 4, Week 4 postoperative, Week 12 postoperative
Time up and go test (TUG)
Day 0, Week 4, Week 4 postoperative, Week 12 postoperative
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Global rehabilitation
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2 hours of daily rehabilitation, 3 days per week during 4 weeks
Personalized rehabilitation
EXPERIMENTAL2 hours of daily rehabilitation including at least 2 times 20 minutes of electrostimulation on atrophied muscles, 3 days per week during 4 weeks
Classic rehabilitation
NO INTERVENTION40 minutes of rehabilitation, once a week during 4 weeks.
Interventions
Patient with knee arthroplasty indication. After clinical assessment and a MRI measurement of muscle volume, patients start a 2 hours daily rehabilitation including 2 times 20 minutes of electrostimulation of atrophied muscles, 3 days per week during 4 weeks.
Patient with knee arthroplasty indication. After clinical assessment and a MRI measurement of muscle volume, patient start a 2 hours daily rehabilitation targeting muscles groups with strengthening and stretching exercises, 3 days per week during 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Terminal stage gonarthrosis with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) indication
- TKA indicated by the surgeon
- Body Mass Index \< 35
- Acceptance to realize a preoperative rehabilitation in outpatient setting
- Adult between 18 and 80 years old
- Patient affiliated to social security
- Patient who signed an informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Functionally uncomfortable osteoarticular illness (disabling pain, functional limitation of joint amplitudes or muscle strength) of controlateral leg.
- Unable or refusal to consent
- Contraindication to electrostimulation (skin lesion, nearby implanted metallic material, implanted cardiac or neurologic electrostimulator, intolerance to muscle electrical stimulation)
- Unstable medical situation preventing the continuous realization of a program of at least 4 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHRU de Brest
Brest, France, 29200, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier REMY-NERIS, Pr
University hospital of Brest
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2020
First Posted
March 23, 2020
Study Start
December 18, 2020
Primary Completion
December 27, 2022
Study Completion
December 27, 2022
Last Updated
March 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will be available beginning three years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion.
- Access Criteria
- Data access request will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest University Hospital. Requestor will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.
All collected data that underlie results in a publication.