Establishing Clinical Utility of a New Diagnostic Test for Patients Suffering From Pain: A CPV® Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will collect high-quality data on how practicing primary care physicians across the U.S. currently manage patients experiencing chronic pain and how the results of Ethos Laboratories' test change clinical decision making. To do so, this study leverages simulated patient cases called Clinical Performance and Value vignettes (CPVs) in a proven methodology to rapidly measure physician care decisions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2020
CompletedSeptember 16, 2020
September 1, 2020
3 months
February 7, 2020
September 14, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
CPV-measured pre-/post-difference in quality score between intervention and control physicians
Physicians completing the simulated cases, or CPVs, receive scores based upon the quality of care they provide. This measure will assess the pre-/post-difference in these scores between control physicians using standard of care diagnostic tools and intervention physicians with access to Ethos test results, including by use case types
2-4 weeks
CPV-measured differences in evidence-based decisions made by intervention physicians and control physicians between rounds 1 and 2
Physicians completing the simulated cases, or CPVs, receive scores based upon the quality of care they provide. This measure will assess differences in evidence-based decisions made by intervention physicians and control physicians between rounds 1 and 2, including by use case types
2-4 weeks
CPV-measured cost difference
Difference in cost of care between control and intervention physicians, including by use case types. (Cost will be calculated by measuring differential rates of medical interventions/levels of care selected by each arm on their CPVs, and multiplying by Medicare reimbursement rates for these interventions, and/or by modeling the incidence of expected complications and calculating associated costs.)
2-4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
CPV-measured baseline variation
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALExperimental-arm providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) with two additions described in the next column:
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThese providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) only.
Interventions
First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck, mock test result and FAQ handout) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Ethos technology. Second, within each of their second-round cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Ethos test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Board-certified physician for at least two years
- Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the last six months
- At least 15% of patient panel with chronic pain
- Prescribes opioids
- Practicing in the U.S.
- English speaking
- Access to the internet
- Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking
- Practicing in an academic setting
- Unable to access the internet
- Not practicing in the U.S.
- Not averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical or patient care duties over the last six months
- Less than 15% of panel with chronic pain
- Does not prescribe opioids
- Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Qure Healthcare, LLClead
- Ethos Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
QURE Healthcare
San Francisco, California, 94133, United States
Related Publications (4)
Burgon TB, Cox-Chapman J, Czarnecki C, Kropp R, Guerriere R, Paculdo D, Peabody JW. Engaging Primary Care Providers to Reduce Unwanted Clinical Variation and Support ACO Cost and Quality Goals: A Unique Provider-Payer Collaboration. Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):321-329. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0111. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
PMID: 30328782BACKGROUNDPeabody J, Martin M, DeMaria L, Florentino J, Paculdo D, Paul M, Vanzo R, Wassman ER, Burgon T. Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive, Whole Genome CMA Testing Platform in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulated Patients in Physician Practices. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169064. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28036350BACKGROUNDPeabody JW, Strand V, Shimkhada R, Lee R, Chernoff D. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063215. Print 2013.
PMID: 23667587BACKGROUNDSolon O, Woo K, Quimbo SA, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines. Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):167-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
PMID: 19224955BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Peabody, MD, PhD
President, QURE Healthcare
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2020
First Posted
February 12, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 4, 2020
Study Completion
May 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share