Study Stopped
Lack of participant recruitment; closure of study based on investigator feedback
Comparison of Training Load With/Out Blood Flow Restriction Training in Rheumatoid Populations
Comparison of Traditional High-Load Training With Low-Load Plus Blood Flow Restriction Training on Strength, Function, and Self-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Rheumatoid Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study will investigate the effects of a traditional, high-intensity strengthening program compared to an investigational low-intensity strengthening program that also uses blood flow restriction as part of the training program. Both groups will be compared to a control group, which will receive no training. Measures of strength, function, and patient outcomes will be taken before starting the training, at mid-term, and at the end of the 8-week training program. Additionally, investigators will collect outcome data at 6 and 12 months after completing the program to assess for long term outcomes. The eligible populations are participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), or myositis. The study will include about 15 participants per group, or 45 people with each diagnosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable rheumatoid-arthritis
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 23, 2023
CompletedJanuary 22, 2024
October 1, 2023
2.3 years
February 28, 2020
January 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
lower extremity strength
Participant's leg strength will be measured by performing a one-repetition maximum lift on both the leg press and leg extension machines. This will be measured at the start of the study, and reassessed with a percent change determined at 4 and 8 weeks. The leg strength measurements will be used to set the weight used during exercise interventions.
Lower extremity strength tests are performed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks, and should take 15-20 minutes to complete
Functional Strength by the Timed-up-and-Go test
Participants will perform the Timed-up-and-Go test, which consists of standing up from a chair, walking a short distance, turning, and returning to the chair. Participants are timed on how long this task takes, and it has been validated as a measure of functional leg strength and balance. The test will be performed when starting the study, and reassessed at 4 and 8 weeks.
The Timed-up-and-Go will be performed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks and should take 2 minutes to complete.
Gait Speed
Participants will be timed on how quickly they are able to walk 10 meters, which will be used to calculate their gait speed in meters per second. The test will be performed when starting the study, and reassessed at 4 and 8 weeks.
Gait speed is performed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks and should take 2 minutes to complete.
Health Assessment Questionnaire
The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) asks a series of questions regarding how participants view their health. Each question is rated from 0-3, with a higher score indicating higher levels of disability. The HAQ is used in this study to investigate changes in self-perceived health status. It will be given on initial visit, and repeated at 4 and 8 weeks. It will be given again as part of the long-term follow-up at 6 and 12 months post-intervention.
The HAQ is performed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks; repeated 6 and 12 months post-intervention, and should take 10-20 minutes to complete.
Cardiovascular endurance walking test
Participants will perform the 6-minute walk test as a measure of cardiovascular endurance. The test involves walking a track for 6 minutes, with instructions to walk as fast as possible for the whole 6 minutes. Distance walked will be recorded and compared to normal values. The test will be performed when starting the study, and reassessed at 4 and 8 weeks.
The 6 minute walk test is performed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks, and should take 6 minutes to complete.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Self-Reported function
Short Form-36 is completed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks; repeated 6 and 12 months post-intervention. It should take 10-20 minutes to complete.
Self-Reported function in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA)
The HOOS is completed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks; repeated 6 and 12 months post-intervention. It should take 10-20 minutes to complete.
Self-Reported function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA)
The KOOS is completed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks; repeated 6 and 12 months post-intervention. It should take 10-20 minutes to complete.
Self-Reported function in patients with foot and/or ankle osteoarthritis (OA)
The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score is completed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks; repeated 6 and 12 months post-intervention. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
This assessment will be performed by the physician pre/post intervention, and should take 10 minutes to complete.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Traditional High-Intensity Training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will perform their training at \~70% of their 1-repetition maximum, as traditionally advocated in strengthening literature. Each of the diagnoses (RA, OA, myositis) will have a High-Intensity arm.
Low Intensity plus Blood Flow Restriction Training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will perform their training at \~30% of their 1-repetition maximum, and will have blood flow partially occluded (60-70%) to the training limb. Each of the diagnoses (RA, OA, myositis) will have a Low-Intensity plus Blood Flow Restriction arm.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONEach of the diagnoses (RA, OA, myositis) will have a control arm. The control groups will be evaluated at time 0, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks but will not receive intervention.
Interventions
Strength training traditionally requires use of high intensity loads to stimulate muscle growth and strength improvements. Some participants will be randomized to a traditional strength training program. Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training is used to stimulate muscle hypertrophy and strength improvements in a variety of populations. Results of BFR training are comparable to traditional high intensity training (HIT) despite using weight that are at a low intensity (low percent of 1 repetition maximum). This intervention has not been extensively studies in the rheumatoid or osteoarthritis populations, nor the myositis populations despite idealogical benefit for each group of low-load strengthening.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis from LSUHSC-SHreveport Rheumatologist of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), or myositis
- stable medication for at least 3 months
- OA in weightbearing joints, and limited to non-advanced OA per Kellgren Lawrence grading
- cleared by rheumatologist for participation in high intensity training and blood flow restriction training
You may not qualify if:
- cardiovascular or other disease preventing exercise participation
- within past 6 months, have performed regular physical activity training or physical therapy
- one or more arthroplasty in weight-bearing joints
- taking more then 5mg of prednisone in past 3 months
- unable to perform timed up and go test, 10 meter walk test, or 6 minute walk test without more than supervision assistance; assistive devices can be used
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LSUHSC-Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Related Publications (9)
Rodrigues R, Ferraz RB, Kurimori CO, Guedes LK, Lima FR, de Sa-Pinto AL, Gualano B, Roschel H. Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood-Flow Restriction in Relation to Muscle Function, Mass, and Functionality in Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;72(6):787-797. doi: 10.1002/acr.23911. Epub 2020 May 14.
PMID: 31033228BACKGROUNDMattar MA, Gualano B, Perandini LA, Shinjo SK, Lima FR, Sa-Pinto AL, Roschel H. Safety and possible effects of low-intensity resistance training associated with partial blood flow restriction in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Oct 25;16(5):473. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0473-5.
PMID: 25344395BACKGROUNDSantos AR, Neves MT Jr, Gualano B, Laurentino GC, Lancha AH Jr, Ugrinowitsch C, Lima FR, Aoki MS. Blood flow restricted resistance training attenuates myostatin gene expression in a patient with inclusion body myositis. Biol Sport. 2014 Jun;31(2):121-4. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1097479. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
PMID: 24899776BACKGROUNDGundermann DM, Walker DK, Reidy PT, Borack MS, Dickinson JM, Volpi E, Rasmussen BB. Activation of mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis in human muscle following blood flow restriction exercise is inhibited by rapamycin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014 May 15;306(10):E1198-204. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00600.2013. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
PMID: 24691032BACKGROUNDKarabulut M, Sherk VD, Bemben DA, Bemben MG. Inflammation marker, damage marker and anabolic hormone responses to resistance training with vascular restriction in older males. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Sep;33(5):393-9. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12044. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
PMID: 23701309BACKGROUNDTakarada Y, Takazawa H, Sato Y, Takebayashi S, Tanaka Y, Ishii N. Effects of resistance exercise combined with moderate vascular occlusion on muscular function in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Jun;88(6):2097-106. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2097.
PMID: 10846023BACKGROUNDRoschel H, Neves-Junior M, Gualano B, Barroso R, Robles C, de Sa Pinto AL, Fuller R, Lima FR. Familiarisation with lower limb strength testing in middle-aged women with osteoarthritis of the knee. Physiotherapy. 2011 Dec;97(4):350-3. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Apr 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 22051593BACKGROUNDBrown LE WJ. Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. 2001;4(1):1-21.
BACKGROUNDAbe T HS, Beekley MD, Koizumi K. Day-to-day change in muscle strength and MRI-measured skeletal muscle size during 7 days KAATSU resistance training: A case study. Int J KAATSU Train Res. 2005;1:71-76.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin McCallister, DPT
LSUHSC-Shreveport
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator responsible for outcomes assessment and evaluation will be blinded. The investigator performing statistical analysis will not be involved with any interventions or assessments prior to being provided data.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2020
First Posted
March 16, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 23, 2023
Study Completion
August 23, 2023
Last Updated
January 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Will not be shared outside of investigators