Sponsor study identifier
interventional
2,105
1 country
8
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)The effect of three front of pack (FOP) labeling schemes (Mexican Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA), Ecuador's Multiple Traffic Light (MTL) and Chilean Warning Labels (WL) in red) on purchasing intentions was evaluated using a randomized experiment of an online shopping simulation. The study employed an online grocery store developed for this purpose to simulate a shopping situation.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 1, 2018
Actual (reported)June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)March 10, 2020
Actual (reported)March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)Mean nutritional quality of the shopping cart
The Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion model was used as the main measure to evaluate the nutritional quality of the shopping cart.
On the date of randomization
Mean nutritional quality of the shopping cart (negative nutrients)
The Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion baseline score, considering only negative nutrients, was used to explore a nutritional quality measure consistent with the key nutrients evaluated.
On the date of randomization
Mean protein content
On the date of randomization, after completion of the online shopping simulation
Mean fiber content
On the date of randomization, after completion of the online shopping simulation
Mean sodium content
On the date of randomization, after completion of the online shopping simulation
Mean sugar content
On the date of randomization, after completion of the online shopping simulation
Mean saturated fat content
On the date of randomization, after completion of the online shopping simulation
Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA) is a purely numerical and reductive labeling system, indicates the grams and percentages (according to the guideline-based daily intakes) per portion of kilocalories, saturated fats, other fats, sugars, and sodium, with no specific judgement, opinion or recommendation.
Multiple traffic light labels, an interpretive nutrient-specific FOP label, use the typical traffic light colors (green, yellow/amber, red) and text descriptors to indicate the high, medium, or low content of total fat, sugar and salt.
All food items displayed the corresponding GDA label in the lower left corner of the front of the package.
All food items displayed the corresponding MTL label in the lower left corner of the front of the package.
Hospital de Alta Especialidad del Bajío
León, Guanajuato, Mexico
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Univesidad Autónoma de Morelos
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62100, Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Universidad de Monterrey
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Universidad Iberoamericana
Mexico City, Mexico
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Mexico City, Mexico
Jauregui A, Vargas-Meza J, Nieto C, Contreras-Manzano A, Alejandro NZ, Tolentino-Mayo L, Hall MG, Barquera S. Impact of front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer purchasing intentions: a randomized experiment in low- and middle-income Mexican adults. BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08549-0.
Alejandra Jauregui, ScD
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
2,105 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 10, 2020
First Posted
March 16, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Actual (reported)Facts-Up-Front Versus Traffic-Light Food Labels
Warning Labels (WL), another nutrient-specific interpretive FOP labelling scheme, include 'high in' symbols for products that exceed limits of energy, sodium, sugar and saturated fat.
Food products were labeled with "High in" labels In the lower left corner of the front of the package. In total, 37 of the 60 food products in the shopping site did not display a WL.
Participants viewed a short (less than 1 min) video explaining how to interpret the label.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
San Luis Potosí City, Mexico
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
De-identified individual participant data will be made available upon request.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: